scispace - formally typeset
T

Theresia Hofer

Publications -  14
Citations -  101

Theresia Hofer is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Chinese Sign Language & Ethnic group. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 14 publications receiving 90 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Women and Gender in Tibetan Medicine

TL;DR: This article reviewed gendered productions, transmissions and practices of Tibetan medicine and discussed the representation of women in medical literature and illustrations, and addressed Tibetan medicine's relations with reproductive healthcare, and suggested the concept of the "house" that derives from anthropological kinship theory as a useful and encompassing tool for analysing the transmission and practice of traditional Tibetan medicine outside lay and monastic institutions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is Lhasa Tibetan Sign Language emerging, endangered, or both?

TL;DR: The appraisal shows that TibSL appears to be between “severely” and “definitely” endangered, adding to the extant studies on the widespread phenomenon of sign language endangerment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Socio-Economic Dimensions of Tibetan Medicine in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China Part One

Theresia Hofer
- 01 Jan 2008 - 
TL;DR: It is argued that several historical, social and political factors have brought about unequal access and availability of Tibetan medicine as compared to Chinese style biomedical care in the rural areas.
Journal ArticleDOI

'Civilising' Deaf people in Tibet and Inner Mongolia: governing linguistic, ethnic and bodily difference in China.

TL;DR: Findings on sign language use, education and state welfare policies in the People’s Republic of China are discussed, showing the promotion of Chinese and Chinese Sign Language over and above the use of local sign and written languages as well as through education and the medicalisation of disabilities.
Book

Medicine and Memory in Tibet: Amchi Physicians in an Age of Reform

TL;DR: Theresia Hofer illuminates how medical practitioners safeguarded their professional heritage through great adversity and personal hardship, in ways that would be impossible in today’s more restrictive political climate that severely limits access for researchers.