scispace - formally typeset
T

Thomas Swearingen

Researcher at Michigan State University

Publications -  10
Citations -  291

Thomas Swearingen is an academic researcher from Michigan State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Biometrics & Crime scene. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 10 publications receiving 204 citations. Previous affiliations of Thomas Swearingen include University of Tennessee.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

ATM: A distributed, collaborative, scalable system for automated machine learning

TL;DR: The initial results show ATM can beat human-generated solutions for 30% of the datasets, and can do so in 1/100th of the time, and the usefulness of ATM is demonstrated.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Spoofing faces using makeup: An investigative study

TL;DR: This work analyzes the potential of using makeup for spoofing an identity, where an individual attempts to impersonate another person's facial appearance, and studies the impact of makeup-induced face spoofing on automated face recognition.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Some Research Problems in Biometrics: The Future Beckons

TL;DR: The need for reliably determining the identity of a person is critical in a number of different domains ranging from personal smartphones to border security; from autonomous vehicles to e-voting; from tracking child vaccinations to preventing human trafficking; from crime scene investigation to personalization of customer service as discussed by the authors.
Posted Content

Some Research Problems in Biometrics: The Future Beckons.

TL;DR: There are several fundamental issues that are yet to be satisfactorily resolved in biometric technology and this article will discuss some of these issues and enumerate some of the exciting challenges in this field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Post-Mortem Iris Recognition—A Survey and Assessment of the State of the Art

TL;DR: This paper surveys research to date on the problem of using iris images acquired after death for automated human recognition, and provides a medically informed commentary on post-mortem iris, analyze the reasons for recognition failures, and identify key directions for future research.