T
Tony J. Kim
Researcher at James Madison University
Publications - 6
Citations - 20
Tony J. Kim is an academic researcher from James Madison University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Context (archaeology) & Event (particle physics). The author has an hindex of 1, co-authored 3 publications receiving 2 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The cleanliness of restaurants: ATP tests (reality) vs consumers’ perception
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared consumers' cleanliness perceptions with empirical measurements of cleanliness in restaurant settings using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) meter.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reexamining event attributes, benefits, and values in a time of pandemic: A multi-faceted approach
Soyoung Boo,Tony J. Kim +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , a sequential mixed-method exploratory strategy with means-end chain theory and the Kano model was used to identify important event attributes, benefits, personal values, and specific satisfaction attributes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Factors influencing student satisfaction and intention to stay in the hospitality and tourism program
TL;DR: In this article , a model with nine factors was proposed and tested to study factors affecting hospitality and tourism student satisfaction and their intention to stay in the program, and the results showed that curriculum, hospitality & tourism degree commitment, student life, self-efficacy, and goals positively affect undergraduate student satisfaction with the program.
Journal ArticleDOI
Event Revisit Intention in The Context of COVID-19 Risks
Soyoung Bo,Tony J. Kim +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the likelihood of return for customers who have prior event (state fair) experience and found that trust in events is a strong predictor of event revisit intention, while perceived risk mediates the relationship between trust and revisit intention.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do restaurant managers, consumers, and inspectors have the same understanding of restaurant inspections?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared three groups (consumers, restaurant managers, and inspectors) in their understanding of restaurant inspection violations under different inspection formats and found that consumers, managers and inspectors were more likely to understand the violations.