T
Toomas Timpka
Researcher at Linköping University
Publications - 336
Citations - 7725
Toomas Timpka is an academic researcher from Linköping University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Population. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 316 publications receiving 6399 citations. Previous affiliations of Toomas Timpka include University of Skövde.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Relevance of workplace social mixing during influenza pandemics: an experimental modelling study of workplace cultures.
Toomas Timpka,Henrik Eriksson,Einar Holm,Magnus Strömgren,Joakim Ekberg,Armin Spreco,Örjan Dahlström +6 more
TL;DR: Simulation experiments are used to examine the impact of different workplace cultures on influenza dissemination during pandemics using semi-virtual models based on authentic sociodemographic and geographical data from a North European community.
Journal Article
Towards integration of computer games in interactive health education environments: understanding gameplay challenge, narrative and spectacle.
TL;DR: Interactive health education environments can be improved by implementing challenging gameplay scripts, spectacular technical features and narratives.
Journal ArticleDOI
Peer-to-Peer Computing in Health-Promoting Voluntary Organizations: A System Design Analysis
TL;DR: The conclusion is that the systems design displays an inexpensive and potentially feasible method for peer-to-peer computing in voluntary health-promoting organisations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Long-term economic effects of team-based clinical case management of patients with chronic minor disease and long-term absence from working life.
TL;DR: Tertiary care level team-based clinical case management for vocational rehabilitation of patients with chronic minor disease has a positive cost-benefit ratio and a cross-boundary awareness at a health policy level is needed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Long-term sickness absence: women's opinions about health and rehabilitation.
Marlene Ockander,Toomas Timpka +1 more
TL;DR: The disparate opinions about health and rehabilitation identified in this study show that future studies need to investigate the prospective value of this categorization to see whether and how these conceptions affect rehabilitation practices.