Showing papers by "Ulrich Schroeders published in 2007"
Journal Article•
TL;DR: Schmidt-Atzert et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated the dimensionality of the criterion achievements as well as the relative contributions of competing ability predictors in predicting the success in college.
Abstract: The utility of aptitude tests and intelligence measures in the prediction of the success in college is one of the empirically best supported results in ability research However, the structure of the criterion "study success" has not been appropriately investigated so far Moreover, it remains unclear which aspect of intelligence - fluid intelligence or crystallized intelligence - has the major impact on the prediction In three studies we have investigated the dimensionality of the criterion achievements as well as the relative contributions of competing ability predictors In the first study, the dimensionality of college grades was explored in a sample of 629 alumni A measurement model with two correlated latent factors distinguishing undergraduate college grades on the one hand from graduate college grades on the other hand had the best fit to the data In the second study, a group of 179 graduate students completed a Psychology knowledge test and provided available college grades in undergraduate studies A model separating a general latent factor for Psychology knowledge from a nested method factor for college grades, and a second nested factor for "experimental orientation" had the best fit to the data In the third study the predictive power of domain specific knowledge tests in Mathematics, English, and Biology was investigated A sample of 387 undergraduate students in this prospective study additionally completed a compilation of fluid intelligence tests The results of this study indicate as expected that: a) ability measures are incrementally predictive over school grades in predicting exam grades; and b) that knowledge tests from relevant domains were incrementally predictive over fluid intelligence The results of these studies suggest that criteria for college admission tests deserve and warrant more attention, and that domain specific ability indicators can contribute to the predictive validity of established admission tests Key words: College admission, incremental validity, knowledge tests, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence Theoretical background In many Western countries aptitude tests are accepted and well validated selection criteria for college admission and other high stakes purposes (Camara & Echternacht, 2000) In Germany the use of aptitude tests for college admission is uncommon Substantial judicial and structural amendments in German student admission politics since August 2004 strengthen the role of universities in the selection process These changes caused an intensive debate on suitable selection criteria and gave an important impulse for the realization of the studies presented in this article Predicting success in college The validity of school grades (predominantly high school grade point average (or GPA) - further referred as high school GPA) for the prediction of exam grades at college has been demonstrated in various studies (Schuler, Funke, & Baron-Boldt, 1990; Gold & Souvignier, 2005; Trapmann, Hell, Weigand, & Schuler, in press) Several studies have demonstrated that these results were also valid for Psychology studies in Germany (Schmidt-Atzert, 2005; Steyer, Yousfi, & Wurfel, 2005) as well as in the United States (Fenster, Markus, Wiedemann, Brackett, & Fernandez, 2001) Incremental validity of aptitude tests over school grades was shown for SAT I (Burton & Ramist, 2001; Bridgeman, Jenkins, & Ervin, 2000; Ramist, Lewis, & McCamley-Jenkins, 1993), GRE (Morrison & Morrison, 1995; Kuncel, Hezlett, & Ones, 2001; Burton & Wang, 2005) and ACT (Noble & Sawyer, 2002) The German Medical Entrance Test TMS, which was applied in Germany between 1986 and 1996, also explained additional variance of college grades over school grades (Stumpf & Nauels, 1990; Trost, Klieme, & Nauels, 1997; Trostetal, 1998) The results from different meta-analytic studies indicate that intelligence measures are strong predictors of study success for different study courses and various criterion information of study success (e …
20 citations