Domain-specific languages (DSLs) are languages tailored to a specific application domain. They offer substantial gains in expressiveness and ease of use compared with general-purpose programming languages in their domain of application. DSL development is hard, requiring both domain knowledge and language development expertise. Few people have both. Not surprisingly, the decision to develop a DSL is often postponed indefinitely, if considered at all, and most DSLs never get beyond the application library stage.Although many articles have been written on the development of particular DSLs, there is very limited literature on DSL development methodologies and many questions remain regarding when and how to develop a DSL. To aid the DSL developer, we identify patterns in the decision, analysis, design, and implementation phases of DSL development. Our patterns improve and extend earlier work on DSL design patterns. We also discuss domain analysis tools and language development systems that may help to speed up DSL development. Finally, we present a number of open problems.

/pdf/when-and-how-to-develop-domain-specific-languages-29nvxv3ngp.pdf

When and how to develop domain-specific languages

The notion of a program slice, originally introduced by Mark Weiser, is useful in program debugging, automatic parallelization, and program integration. A slice of a program is taken with respect to a program point p and a variable x; the slice consists of all statements of the program that might affect the value of x at point p. This paper concerns the problem of interprocedural slicing—generating a slice of an entire program, where the slice crosses the boundaries of procedure calls. To solve this problem, we introduce a new kind of graph to represent programs, called a system dependence graph, which extends previous dependence representations to incorporate collections of procedures (with procedure calls) rather than just monolithic programs. Our main result is an algorithm for interprocedural slicing that uses the new representation. (It should be noted that our work concerns a somewhat restricted kind of slice: rather than permitting a program to b e sliced with respect to program point p and an arbitrary variable, a slice must be taken with respect to a variable that is defined or used at p.)The chief difficulty in interprocedural slicing is correctly accounting for the calling context of a called procedure. To handle this problem, system dependence graphs include some data dependence edges that represent transitive dependences due to the effects of procedure calls, in addition to the conventional direct-dependence edges. These edges are constructed with the aid of an auxiliary structure that represents calling and parameter-linkage relationships. This structure takes the form of an attribute grammar. The step of computing the required transitive-dependence edges is reduced to the construction of the subordinate characteristic graphs for the grammar's nonterminals.

/pdf/interprocedural-slicing-using-dependence-graphs-2fk5z60hh9.pdf

Interprocedural slicing using dependence graphs

Functions, types and expressions programming languages and their operational semantics compilation partial evaluation of a flow chart languages partial evaluation of a first-order functional languages the view from Olympus partial evaluation of the Lambda calculus partial evaluation of prolog aspects of Similix - a partial evaluator for a subset of scheme partial evaluation of C applications of partial evaluation termination of partial evaluation program analysis more general program transformation guide to the literature the self-applicable scheme specializer.

Partial evaluation and automatic program generation

Social science research contains a wealth of knowledge for people seeking to understand collaboration processes. The authors argue that public managers should look inside the “black box” of collaboration processes. Inside, they will find a complex construct of five variable dimensions: governance, administration, organizational autonomy, mutuality, and norms. Public managers must know these five dimensions and manage them intentionally in order to collaborate effectively.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/4096567.pdf

Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box

Computer algebra systems are now ubiquitous in all areas of science and engineering. This highly successful textbook, widely regarded as the “bible of computer algebra”, gives a thorough introduction to the algorithmic basis of the mathematical engine in computer algebra systems. Designed to accompany oneor two-semester courses for advanced undergraduate or graduate students in computer science or mathematics, its comprehensiveness and reliability has also made it an essential reference for professionals in the area. Special features include: detailed study of algorithms including time analysis; implementation reports on several topics; complete proofs of the mathematical underpinnings; and a wide variety of applications (among others, in chemistry, coding theory, cryptography, computational logic, and the design of calendars and musical scales). A great deal of historical information and illustration enlivens the text. In this third edition, errors have been corrected and much of the Fast Euclidean Algorithm chapter has been renovated.

Modern computer algebra

Ordered attributed grammars are defined as a large subclass of semantically well-defined attributed grammars proposed by Knuth. An attributed grammar is ordered if for each symbol a partial order over the associated attributes can be given, such that in any context of the symbol the attributes are evaluable in an order which includes that partial order. The definition does not refer to a predefined strategy for attribute evaluation, e.g. several passes from left to right. For each attributed grammar evaluable by any predefined evaluation strategy such an order exists. The ordering property can be checked by an algorithm, which depends polynomially in time on the size of the input grammar. "Visit-sequences" are computed from the attribute dependencies given by an ordered attributed grammar. They describe the control flow of an algorithm for attribute evaluation which can be part of an automatically generated compiler.

/pdf/ordered-attributed-grammars-4tg6vjfl7v.pdf

Ordered attributed grammars

1: Introduction.- 2: The compiler generator GAG.- 3: ALADIN A language for distributed definitions.- 4: Development of an attributed grammar for a Pascal-Analyzer.- 5: Generating efficient compiler front-ends.

Gag: A Practical Compiler Generator

An attribute grammar is a declarative specification of dependence among computations carried out at the nodes of a tree. Attribute grammars have proven remarkably difficult to decompose into logical fragments. As a result, they have not yet been accepted as a viable specification technique. By combining the ideas of remote attribute access and inheritance, we have been able to define “attribution modules” that can be reused in a variety of applications. As an example, we show how to define reusable modules for name analysis that embody different scope rules.

Modularity and reusability in attribute grammars

Dynamically reconfigurable hardware combines hardware performance with software-like flexibility and finds increasing use in networked systems. The capability to load hardware modules at runtime provides these systems with an unparalleled degree of adaptivity, but at the same time poses new challenges for security and safety. In this paper, we present proof-carrying hardware (PCH) as a novel approach to reconfigurable system security. PCH takes a key concept from software security, known as proof-carrying code, into the reconfigurable hardware domain. We outline the PCH concept and discuss runtime combinational equivalence checking as a first verification problem applying the concept. We present a tool flow and experimental results demonstrating the feasibility and potential of the PCH approach.

Proof-Carrying Hardware: Towards Runtime Verification of Reconfigurable Modules

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBFb0026439.pdf

Uwe Kastens

Papers

Ordered attributed grammars

Gag: A Practical Compiler Generator

Modularity and reusability in attribute grammars

Proof-Carrying Hardware: Towards Runtime Verification of Reconfigurable Modules

The Eli System