Classification systems are necessary in order to provide a framework in which to scientifically study the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of diseases in an orderly fashion. In addition, such systems give clinicians a way to organize the health care needs of their patients. The last time scientists and clinicians in the field of periodontology and related areas agreed upon a classi- fication system for periodontal diseases was in 1989 at the World Workshop in Clinical Periodontics.1 Subsequently, a simpler classification was agreed upon at the 1st European Workshop in Periodontology.2 These classification systems have been widely used by clinicians and research scientists throughout the world. Unfortunately, the 1989 classification had many shortcomings including: 1) considerable overlap in disease categories, 2) absence of a gingival disease component, 3) inappropriate emphasis on age of onset of disease and rates of progression, and 4) inadequate or unclear classification criteria. The 1993 Europea...

/pdf/development-of-a-classification-system-for-periodontal-3vu8csrg57.pdf

Development of a Classification System for Periodontal Diseases and Conditions

Background: Accurate information on the prevalence and extent of periodontal diseases in the United States adult population is lacking. This study estimated the prevalence and extent of periodontal disease in the United States using data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Methods: A nationally representative sample was obtained during 1988 to 1994 by a stratified, multi-stage probability sampling design. A subsample of 9,689 dentate persons 30 to 90 years old who received a periodontal examination was used in this study, representing approximately 105.8 million civilian, non-institutionalized Americans in 1988 to 1994. Periodontal attachment loss, probing depth, and furcation involvement were assessed in 2 randomly selected quadrants per person. Attachment loss and probing depth were assessed at 2 sites per tooth, the mesiobuccal and mid-buccal surfaces. The periodontal status of each subject was assessed by criteria based on the extent and severity of probing de...

Destructive periodontal disease in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994.

1. The interpretation of epidemiological data of periodontal disease is difficult, due to inconsistencies in the methodology used. It is not possible, therefore, to accurately assess if the prevalence of the periodontal diseases shows a world-wide decline. As long as the disease is assessed through accumulated clinical attachment loss, retention of the natural dentition in older ages entails increased prevalence in these cohorts. Contemporary epidemiological studies should ideally employ full-mouth examination of the periodontal tissues. Partial recording estimates are generally biased, especially when the prevalence of the disease is low. 2. Early-onset periodontitis is infrequent in all populations. Adult periodontitis is rather prevalent; however, advanced disease affects limited subfractions of the population (probably less than 10 to 15%). Although prevalence figures vary with race and geographic region, in most cases, the progression pattern of the disease seems compatible with the retention of a functional dentition throughout life. 3. Of a plethora of behavioral and environmental risk markers identified by multi-variate analysis, smoking and presence of certain subgingival microorganisms have been proven to be true risk factors. The same holds true for diabetes mellitus, a systemic condition that confers a risk for periodontal disease which is independent of the effect of other significant factors. 4. In certain cases, periodontal infections appear to have a systemic impact on the host. Most recent data indicate that periodontal disease may confer risk for coronary heart disease and pre-term low birth weight.

Periodontal Diseases: Epidemiology

Periodontal health is defined by absence of clinically detectable inflammation. There is a biological level of immune surveillance that is consistent with clinical gingival health and homeostasis. Clinical gingival health may be found in a periodontium that is intact, i.e. without clinical attachment loss or bone loss, and on a reduced periodontium in either a non-periodontitis patient (e.g. in patients with some form of gingival recession or following crown lengthening surgery) or in a patient with a history of periodontitis who is currently periodontally stable. Clinical gingival health can be restored following treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis. However, the treated and stable periodontitis patient with current gingival health remains at increased risk of recurrent periodontitis, and accordingly, must be closely monitored. Two broad categories of gingival diseases include non-dental plaque biofilm-induced gingival diseases and dental plaque-induced gingivitis. Non-dental plaque biofilm-induced gingival diseases include a variety of conditions that are not caused by plaque and usually do not resolve following plaque removal. Such lesions may be manifestations of a systemic condition or may be localized to the oral cavity. Dental plaque-induced gingivitis has a variety of clinical signs and symptoms, and both local predisposing factors and systemic modifying factors can affect its extent, severity, and progression. Dental plaque-induced gingivitis may arise on an intact periodontium or on a reduced periodontium in either a non-periodontitis patient or in a currently stable "periodontitis patient" i.e. successfully treated, in whom clinical inflammation has been eliminated (or substantially reduced). A periodontitis patient with gingival inflammation remains a periodontitis patient (Figure 1), and comprehensive risk assessment and management are imperative to ensure early prevention and/or treatment of recurrent/progressive periodontitis. Precision dental medicine defines a patient-centered approach to care, and therefore, creates differences in the way in which a "case" of gingival health or gingivitis is defined for clinical practice as opposed to epidemiologically in population prevalence surveys. Thus, case definitions of gingival health and gingivitis are presented for both purposes. While gingival health and gingivitis have many clinical features, case definitions are primarily predicated on presence or absence of bleeding on probing. Here we classify gingival health and gingival diseases/conditions, along with a summary table of diagnostic features for defining health and gingivitis in various clinical situations.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcpe.12940

Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions

Non-Surgical Pocket Therapy: Mechanical

The reasons for tooth extractions in adults and their validation.

A practice-based randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush on gingival health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances

This 5-year longitudinal study monitored 167 subjects at ages 14.3, 16.0 and 19.6 years. The aims were (1) to determine loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm in the study group over the 5-year period; (2) to relate baseline levels of oral deposits and gingivitis to the 5-year increment of loss of attachment; (3) to determine whether subjects who had developed loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm by age 16 years were more susceptible to further development of loss of attachment; (4) to evaluate loss of attachment indices. Loss of attachment, plaque, subgingival calculus, gingival bleeding and gingival colour change were measured. At baseline, 3% of subjects had loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm and less than 1% of sites were involved. By age 19 years, 77% had loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm, and 31% of sites were affected. There was a significant correlation between the presence of subgingival calculus at baseline and the 5-year increment of loss of attachment (Pearson's r = 0.26 p less than 0.001). Subjects who had developed loss of attachment by age 16 years still had significantly more sites affected at the more severe 2 mm level 3 years later than their peers (p less than 0.05). The results suggest that a flexible approach is needed in selecting indices of loss of attachment for epidemiological investigations.

5-year results of a longitudinal study of early periodontitis in 14- to 19-year-old adolescents.

The aims of this study were (1) to monitor the progression and patterns of progression of loss of attachment > or = 1 mm on a site basis over a 5-year period in adolescents, and (2) to relate the presence of oral deposits and inflammation to the subsequent development and progression of loss of attachment on a site basis. 167 subjects were examined at ages 14, 16 and 19 years. Loss of attachment > or = 1 mm, plaque, subgingival calculus, gingival bleeding and gingival colour change were assessed on the mesio-buccal sites of the 1st molars, 1st premolars and central incisors. Each site was treated separately in the analysis to avoid the problem of within-subject site dependence. Sites were classed as progressing, non-progressing or fluctuating according to the probing attachment level measurements at each of the 3 examinations. During the 5 years of this study, a total of 542 sites in 128 subjects progressed; 1136 sites in 162 subjects did not progress; 43 sites in 30 subjects had fluctuating attachment level measurements. Sites which subsequently progressed had significantly more plaque, subgingival calculus and gingival inflammation than non-progressing sites at the baseline examination and throughout the study (p < 0.001). Between 55-57% of the maxillary 1st molars and 46-49% of the mandibular incisors progressed. In contrast, there was no progression of loss of attachment on over 80% of the maxillary central incisors and mandibular 1st premolars.

Site progression of loss of attachment over 5 years in 14‐to 19‐year‐old adolescents

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia in a group of adolescents and investigate the association of these organisms with various clinical parameters. A total of 527, 11-13-year-old children, of whom 333 (63%) were white Caucasian, 187 (35%) Indo-Pakistani and 7 (1%) Afro-Caribbean, participated in the study. Subgingival plaque samples, collected from the mesio-buccal of both upper first permanent molars using sterile paper points, were stored in phosphate buffered saline with 0.01% thiomersal and analysed for the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis and P. intermedia using ELISA. The mesio-buccal sites of both upper 1st permanent molars were also examined and the presence/absence of supragingival plaque, subgingival calculus, bleeding on probing and pocket depths greater than 3 mm were recorded. The % of white Caucasian children in whom the monoclonal antibody identified at least 1 site with A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis and P. intermedia were 4%, 3% and 2%, respectively, and for Indo-Pakistanis were 3%, 17% and 2%. The difference for P. gingivalis was statistically significant (p 3 mm and bleeding on probing (p < 0.01).

V. Clerehugh

Papers

The reasons for tooth extractions in adults and their validation.

A practice-based randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush on gingival health in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances

5-year results of a longitudinal study of early periodontitis in 14- to 19-year-old adolescents.

Site progression of loss of attachment over 5 years in 14‐to 19‐year‐old adolescents

Prevalence of suspected periodontal pathogens identified using ELISA in adolescents of differing ethnic origins