Showing papers by "Vincent Cogliano published in 2008"

Meeting report: moving upstream-evaluating adverse upstream end points for improved risk assessment and decision-making.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Assessing adverse effects from environmental chemical exposure is integral to public health policies. Toxicology assays identifying early biological changes from chemical exposure are increasing our ability to evaluate links, between early biological disturbances and subsequent overt downstream effects. A workshop was held to consider how the resulting data inform consideration of an "adverse effect" in the context of hazard identification and risk assessment. OBJECTIVES: Our objective here is to review what is known about the relationships between chemical exposure, early biological effects (Upstream events), and later overt effects (downstream events) through three case studies (thyroid hormone disruption, antiandrogen effects, immune system disruption) and to consider how to evaluate hazard and risk when early biological effect data are available. DISCUSSION: Each case study presents data on the toxicity pathways linking early biological perturbations with downstream overt effects. Case studies also emphasize several factors that can influence risk of overt disease as a result from early biological perturbations, including background chemical exposures, underlying individual biological processes, and disease susceptibility. Certain effects resulting from exposure during periods of sensitivity may, be irreversible. A chemical can act through multiple modes of action, resulting in similar or different overt effects. CONCLUSIONS: For certain classes of early perturbations, Sufficient information oil the disease process is known, so hazard and quantitative risk assessment can proceed using information on upstream biological perturbations. Upstream data will Support improved approaches for considering developmental stage, background exposures, disease status, and other factors important to assessing hazard and risk for the whole population

Use of mechanistic data in IARC evaluations

Abstract: Consideration of mechanistic data has the potential to improve the analysis of both epidemiologic studies and cancer bioassays. IARC has a classification system in which mechanistic data can play a pivotal role. Since 1991, IARC has allowed an agent to be classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) when there is less than sufficient evidence in humans but there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals and "strong evidence in exposed humans that the agent acts through a relevant mechanism of carcinogenicity." Mechanistic evidence can also substitute for conventional cancer bioassays when there is less than sufficient evidence in experimental animals, just as mechanistic evidence can substitute for conventional epidemiologic studies when there is less than sufficient evidence in humans. The IARC Monographs have used mechanistic data to raise or lower a classification that would be otherwise based on epidemiologic studies and cancer bioassays only. Recently, the IARC Monographs have evaluated several agents where mechanistic data were pivotal to the overall evaluation: benzo[a]pyrene, carbon black and other poorly soluble particles, ingested nitrates and nitrites, and microcystin-LR. In evaluating mechanistic data, it is important to consider alternative mechanistic hypotheses, because an agent may induce tumors through multiple mechanisms.