V
Vincent Egan
Researcher at University of Nottingham
Publications - 145
Citations - 4894
Vincent Egan is an academic researcher from University of Nottingham. The author has contributed to research in topics: Personality & Agreeableness. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 141 publications receiving 4356 citations. Previous affiliations of Vincent Egan include London South Bank University & University of Edinburgh.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence
TL;DR: In this paper, the relative strengths of EI and personality as regression predictors of health-related outcomes were investigated for a subgroup of Scots (N range 99-111).
Journal ArticleDOI
The dark triad and normal personality traits
Sharon Jakobwitz,Vincent Egan +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the degree to which these constructs could be identified in 82 persons recruited from the general population, predicting that the dark triad would emerge as a single dimension denoting the cardinal interpersonal elements of primary psychopathy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the degree to which general intelligence pervades performance on mental tests is greater at lower ability levels than at higher ability levels, and that the below-average ability groups had a more pervasive g factor, confirming the differentiation hypothesis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined whether a trait model of general personality and the dark triad underlay moral disengagement, the relationship these constructs have to unethical consumer attitudes, and whether moral engagement provided incremental validity in the prediction of antisocial behaviour.
Journal ArticleDOI
The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E
TL;DR: The NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was given to 1025 British subjects as part of three independent research studies as mentioned in this paper, and data from these studies were pooled and subjected to item-level analyses.