scispace - formally typeset
W

W. Scott Schroth

Researcher at George Washington University

Publications -  5
Citations -  223

W. Scott Schroth is an academic researcher from George Washington University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Curriculum & Higher education. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 190 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.

TL;DR: Implementation of an education and feedback-supported acute low back pain care guideline for primary care clinicians was associated with an increase in guideline-consistent behavior and Implementation barriers could limit the utility of this approach in usual care settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy.

TL;DR: A three-level framework for applying integration as a guiding curricular strategy is proposed, in which decisions about integration must follow curricular decisions made at the program level, the course level, and then the individual session level.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Educational Climate Inventory: Measuring Students' Perceptions of the Preclerkship and Clerkship Settings.

TL;DR: This paper developed an instrument to assess educational climate, a critical aspect of the medical school learning environment that previous tools have not explored in depth, by capturing aspects of Dweck's performance, to distinguish students' perceptio
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing medical students to careers in medical education: The student track at an annual medical education conference

TL;DR: The authors’ goal in creating the NEGEA conference student track was to excite students about careers in medical education by providing them with an array of opportunities for active involvement in both student-specific and general conference activities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effecting Curricular Change Through Comprehensive Course Assessment: Using Structure and Process to Change Outcomes

TL;DR: The revised process uses a broad array of information, requires significant faculty participation, and uses questioning, writing, and dialogue to encourage faculty reflection and learning, and can be easily transferred to other medical schools and are applicable to other curricular reform projects across the continuum of medical education.