物件導向軟體之架構(Object-Oriented Software Construction)探討

ing WS1S Systems to Verify Parameterized Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 Kai Baukus, Saddek Bensalem, Yassine Lakhnech and Karsten Stahl FMona: A Tool for Expressing Validation Techniques over Infinite State Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 J.-P. Bodeveix and M. Filali Transitive Closures of Regular Relations for Verifying Infinite-State Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Bengt Jonsson and Marcus Nilsson Diagnostic and Test Generation Using Static Analysis to Improve Automatic Test Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 Marius Bozga, Jean-Claude Fernandez and Lucian Ghirvu Efficient Diagnostic Generation for Boolean Equation Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 Radu Mateescu Efficient Model-Checking Compositional State Space Generation with Partial Order Reductions for Asynchronous Communicating Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 Jean-Pierre Krimm and Laurent Mounier Checking for CFFD-Preorder with Tester Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 Juhana Helovuo and Antti Valmari Fair Bisimulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 Thomas A. Henzinger and Sriram K. Rajamani Integrating Low Level Symmetries into Reachability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 Karsten Schmidt Model-Checking Tools Model Checking Support for the ASM High-Level Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 Giuseppe Del Castillo and Kirsten Winter Table of

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. Proc. TACAS 2009

Functions, types and expressions programming languages and their operational semantics compilation partial evaluation of a flow chart languages partial evaluation of a first-order functional languages the view from Olympus partial evaluation of the Lambda calculus partial evaluation of prolog aspects of Similix - a partial evaluator for a subset of scheme partial evaluation of C applications of partial evaluation termination of partial evaluation program analysis more general program transformation guide to the literature the self-applicable scheme specializer.

Partial evaluation and automatic program generation

Constraint programming is a powerful paradigm for solving combinatorial search problems that draws on a wide range of techniques from artificial intelligence, computer science, databases, programming languages, and operations research. Constraint programming is currently applied with success to many domains, such as scheduling, planning, vehicle routing, configuration, networks, and bioinformatics.

The aim of this handbook is to capture the full breadth and depth of the constraint programming field and to be encyclopedic in its scope and coverage. While there are several excellent books on constraint programming, such books necessarily focus on the main notions and techniques and cannot cover also extensions, applications, and languages. The handbook gives a reasonably complete coverage of all these lines of work, based on constraint programming, so that a reader can have a rather precise idea of the whole field and its potential. Of course each line of work is dealt with in a survey-like style, where some details may be neglected in favor of coverage. However, the extensive bibliography of each chapter will help the interested readers to find suitable sources for the missing details. Each chapter of the handbook is intended to be a self-contained survey of a topic, and is written by one or more authors who are leading researchers in the area.

The intended audience of the handbook is researchers, graduate students, higher-year undergraduates and practitioners who wish to learn about the state-of-the-art in constraint programming. No prior knowledge about the field is necessary to be able to read the chapters and gather useful knowledge. Researchers from other fields should find in this handbook an effective way to learn about constraint programming and to possibly use some of the constraint programming concepts and techniques in their work, thus providing a means for a fruitful cross-fertilization among different research areas.

The handbook is organized in two parts. The first part covers the basic foundations of constraint programming, including the history, the notion of constraint propagation, basic search methods, global constraints, tractability and computational complexity, and important issues in modeling a problem as a constraint problem. The second part covers constraint languages and solver, several useful extensions to the basic framework (such as interval constraints, structured domains, and distributed CSPs), and successful application areas for constraint programming.

- Covers the whole field of constraint programming
- Survey-style chapters
- Five chapters on applications

Table of Contents

Foreword (Ugo Montanari) 
Part I : Foundations
Chapter 1. Introduction (Francesca Rossi, Peter van Beek, Toby Walsh) 
Chapter 2. Constraint Satisfaction: An Emerging Paradigm (Eugene C. Freuder, Alan K. Mackworth) 
Chapter 3. Constraint Propagation (Christian Bessiere) 
Chapter 4. Backtracking Search Algorithms (Peter van Beek) 
Chapter 5. Local Search Methods (Holger H. Hoos, Edward Tsang) 
Chapter 6. Global Constraints (Willem-Jan van Hoeve, Irit Katriel)
Chapter 7. Tractable Structures for CSPs (Rina Dechter)
Chapter 8. The Complexity of Constraint Languages
(David Cohen, Peter Jeavons) 
Chapter 9. Soft Constraints (Pedro Meseguer, Francesca Rossi, Thomas Schiex) 
Chapter 10. Symmetry in Constraint Programming
(Ian P. Gent, Karen E. Petrie, Jean-Francois Puget)
Chapter 11. Modelling (Barbara M. Smith) 
Part II : Extensions, Languages, and Applications

Chapter 12. Constraint Logic Programming (Kim Marriott, Peter J. Stuckey, Mark Wallace) 
Chapter 13. Constraints in Procedural and Concurrent Languages (Thom Fruehwirth, Laurent Michel, Christian Schulte)
Chapter 14. Finite Domain Constraint Programming Systems (Christian Schulte, Mats Carlsson) 
Chapter 15. Operations Research Methods in Constraint Programming (John Hooker) 
Chapter 16. Continuous and Interval Constraints(Frederic Benhamou, Laurent Granvilliers) 
Chapter 17. Constraints over Structured Domains
(Carmen Gervet) 
Chapter 18. Randomness and Structure (Carla Gomes, Toby Walsh)
Chapter 19. Temporal CSPs (Manolis Koubarakis)
Chapter 20. Distributed Constraint Programming
(Boi Faltings) 
Chapter 21. Uncertainty and Change (Kenneth N. Brown, Ian Miguel)
Chapter 22. Constraint-Based Scheduling and Planning
(Philippe Baptiste, Philippe Laborie, Claude Le Pape, Wim Nuijten)
Chapter 23. Vehicle Routing (Philip Kilby, Paul Shaw) 
Chapter 24. Configuration (Ulrich Junker)
Chapter 25. Constraint Applications in Networks
(Helmut Simonis)
Chapter 26. Bioinformatics and Constraints (Rolf Backofen, David Gilbert)

/pdf/handbook-of-constraint-programming-53srutguo2.pdf

Handbook of Constraint Programming

Hofmann and Jost have presented a heap space analysis [1] that finds linear space bounds for many functional programs. It uses an amortised analysis: assigning hypothetical amounts of free space (called potential) to data structures in proportion to their sizes using type annotations. Constraints on these annotations in the type system ensure that the total potential assigned to the input is an upper bound on the total memory required to satisfy all allocations.

We describe a related system for bounding the stack space requirements which uses the depth of data structures, by expressing potential in terms of maxima as well as sums. This is achieved by adding extra structure to typing contexts (inspired by O'Hearn's bunched typing [2]) to describe the form of the bounds. We will also present the extra steps that must be taken to construct a typing during the analysis.

/pdf/amortised-memory-analysis-using-the-depth-of-data-structures-hxqcvqf6l2.pdf

Amortised Memory Analysis Using the Depth of Data Structures

Ensuring the correctness of software for communication centric programs is important but challenging. Previous approaches, based on session types, have been intensively investigated over the past decade. They provide a concise way to express protocol specifications and a lightweight approach for checking their implementation. Current solutions are based on only implicit synchronization, and are based on the less precise types rather than logical formulae. In this paper, we propose a more expressive session logic to capture multiparty protocols. By using two kinds of ordering constraints, namely "happens-before" <HB and "communicates-before" <CB, we show how to ensure from first principle race-freedom over common channels. Our approach refines each specification with both assumptions and proof obligations to ensure compliance to some global protocol. Each specification is then projected for each party and then each channel, to allow cooperative proving through localized automated verification. Our primary goal in automated verification is to ensure race-freedom and communication-safety, but the approach is extensible for deadlock-freedom as well. We shall also describe how modular protocols can be captured and handled by our approach.

Automated Modular Verification for Race-Free Channels with Implicit and Explicit Synchronization.

Traditionally, the focus of specification mechanism has been on improving its ability to cover a wider range of problems more accurately, while the effectiveness of verification is left to the underlying theorem provers. Our work attempts a novel approach, where the focus is on designing good specification mechanisms to achieve better expressivity (the specification should capture more accurately and concisely the functionality of the corresponding code) and better verifiability (the verification process should succeed in more scenarios than the corresponding verification without the specification enhancements, with better or similar performance). Moreover, we are also interested in providing the necessary tools to assist the user with the important but tedious task of constructing desired specifications. Existing approaches to specification construction tend to be either fully manual or fully automatic. We propose a new framework for specification construction that can be done selectively and incrementally. This framework allows preconditions and post conditions to be selectively inferred via a set of specified variables, that included synthesis for unknown functions and relations.

From Verification to Specification Inference

This presentation will cover a framework for application-level tracing of OCaml programs. We outline a solution to the main technical challenge, which is being able to log typed values with lower overhead and maintenance burden than existing approaches. We then demonstrate the tools we have built around this for visualizing and exploring executions.

Tracing OCaml Programs

This paper proposes a new timestamp-based distributed deadlock detection and resolution algorithm for the AND resource request model. It is different from existing distributed deadlock detection algorithms in that the timestamps we adopt are partially ordered. The timestamps are also dynamically allocated and may be modified at run-time. Compared to previous work, our algorithm can reduce the number of deadlock detections. It can achieve this without incurring additional communication costs by combining timestamp modification with deadlock detection and resolution.

Variable Timestamp-Based Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution

In the context of program verification, we propose a formal framework for proof slicing that can aggressively reduce the size of proof obligations as a means of performance improvement. In particular, each large proof obligation may be broken down into smaller proofs, for which the overall processing cost can be greatly reduced, and be even more effective under proof caching. Our proposal is built on top of existing automatic provers, including the state-of-the-art prover Z3, and can also be viewed as a re-engineering effort in proof decomposition that attempts to avoid large-sized proofs for which these provers may be particularly inefficient. In our approach, we first develop a calculus that formalizes a complete proof slicing procedure, which is followed by the development of an aggressive proof slicing method. Retaining completeness is important, and thus in our experiments the complete method serves as a backup for the cases when the aggressive procedure fails. The foundations of the aggressive slicing procedure are based on a novel lightweight annotation scheme that captures weak links between sub-formulas of a proof obligation; the annotations can be inferred automatically in practice, and thus both methods are fully automated.

/pdf/a-proof-slicing-framework-for-program-verification-1gw3egofgu.pdf

Wei-Ngan Chin

Papers

Automated Modular Verification for Race-Free Channels with Implicit and Explicit Synchronization.

From Verification to Specification Inference

Tracing OCaml Programs

Variable Timestamp-Based Distributed Deadlock Detection and Resolution

A Proof Slicing Framework for Program Verification