scispace - formally typeset
W

William A. Cunningham

Researcher at University of Toronto

Publications -  123
Citations -  16341

William A. Cunningham is an academic researcher from University of Toronto. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 39, co-authored 110 publications receiving 14170 citations. Previous affiliations of William A. Cunningham include Ohio State University & Yale University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the controversial practice of using parcels of items as manifest variables in structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures and conclude that the unconsidered use of parcels is never warranted, while, at the same time, the considered use of items cannot be dismissed out of hand.
Journal ArticleDOI

Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale

TL;DR: Simulations demonstrate that combined intensity and cluster size thresholds such as P < 0.005 with a 10 voxel extent produce a desirable balance between Types I and II error rates, and recommend a greater focus on replication and meta-analysis rather than emphasizing single studies as the unit of analysis for establishing scientific truth.
Journal ArticleDOI

Performance on Indirect Measures of Race Evaluation Predicts Amygdala Activation

TL;DR: The results suggest that amygdala and behavioral responses to Black-versus-White faces in White subjects reflect cultural evaluations of social groups modified by individual experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity

TL;DR: An assessment of the interitem consistency, stability, and convergent validity of some implicit attitude measures found that stability indices improved and implicit measures were substantially correlated with each other, forming a single latent factor.
Journal ArticleDOI

Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces

TL;DR: Results provide evidence for neural distinctions between automatic and more controlled processing of social groups, and suggest that controlled processes may modulate automatic evaluation.