Tumor cells actively produce, release, and utilize exosomes to promote tumor growth. Mechanisms through which tumor-derived exosomes subserve the tumor are under intense investigation. These exosomes are information carriers, conveying molecular and genetic messages from tumor cells to normal or other abnormal cells residing at close or distant sites. Tumor-derived exosomes are found in all body fluids. Upon contact with target cells, they alter phenotypic and functional attributes of recipients, reprogramming them into active contributors to angiogenesis, thrombosis, metastasis, and immunosuppression. Exosomes produced by tumors carry cargos that in part mimic contents of parent cells and are of potential interest as noninvasive biomarkers of cancer. Their role in inhibiting the host antitumor responses and in mediating drug resistance is important for cancer therapy. Tumor-derived exosomes may interfere with cancer immunotherapy, but they also could serve as adjuvants and antigenic components of antitumor vaccines. Their biological roles in cancer development or progression as well as cancer therapy suggest that tumor-derived exosomes are critical components of oncogenic transformation.

Tumor-Derived Exosomes and Their Role in Cancer Progression.

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles secreted by most eukaryotic cells and participate in intercellular communication. The components of exosomes, including proteins, DNA, mRNA, microRNA, long noncoding RNA, circular RNA, etc., which play a crucial role in regulating tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis in the process of cancer development, and can be used as a prognostic marker and/or grading basis for tumor patients. Hereby, we mainly summarized as followed: the role of exosome contents in cancer, focusing on proteins and noncoding RNA; the interaction between exosomes and tumor microenvironment; the mechanisms that epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion and migration of tumor affected by exosomes; and tumor suppression strategies based on exosomes. Finally, the application potential of exosomes in clinical tumor diagnosis and therapy is prospected, which providing theoretical supports for using exosomes to serve precise tumor treatment in the clinic.

/pdf/exosomes-key-players-in-cancer-and-potential-therapeutic-49qicrmv06.pdf

Exosomes: key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy.

Tumor-derived exosomes (TEX) are harbingers of tumor-induced immune suppression: they carry immunosuppressive molecules and factors known to interfere with immune cell functions. By delivering suppressive cargos consisting of proteins similar to those in parent tumor cells to immune cells, TEX directly or indirectly influence the development, maturation, and antitumor activities of immune cells. TEX also deliver genomic DNA, mRNA, and microRNAs to immune cells, thereby reprogramming functions of responder cells to promote tumor progression. TEX carrying tumor-associated antigens can interfere with antitumor immunotherapies. TEX also have the potential to serve as noninvasive biomarkers of tumor progression. In the tumor microenvironment, TEX may be involved in operating numerous signaling pathways responsible for the downregulation of antitumor immunity.

/pdf/exosomes-and-tumor-mediated-immune-suppression-v25xe3f2ru.pdf

Exosomes and tumor-mediated immune suppression

Cell membrane-derived nanomaterials for biomedical applications

Exosomes in Cancer Nanomedicine and Immunotherapy: Prospects and Challenges.

Leukemia immunotherapy frequently does not meet expectation, one of the handicaps being tumor exosome (TEX)-promoted immunosuppression. We here asked, using the mouse myeloid leukemia WEHI3B and the renal cell carcinoma line RENCA, whether dendritic cell (DC) vaccination suffices to counterregulate TEX-induced immunosuppression and whether TEX could serve as tumor antigen for DC-loading. DC-vaccination significantly prolonged the survival time of WEHI3B-bearing mice, TEX-loaded DC (DC-TEX) being superior to lysate-loaded DC (DC-lys), even an excess of TEX not interfering with immune response induction. The superior response to DC-TEX was accompanied by an increase in WEHI3B-specific CD4+ T cells, evaluated by trogocytosis and proliferation. Similar findings accounted for DC loaded with RENCA TEX. TEX was efficiently taken-up by DC and TEX uptake supported CD11c, MHCII and IL12 upregulation in DC. Importantly, TEX was partly recruited into the MHCII-loading compartment such that "TEX" presentation time and recovery in T cells significantly exceeded that of tumor-lysate. Thus, TEX did not drive DC into a suppressive phenotype and were a superior antigen due to higher efficacy of TEX-presentation that is supported by prolonged persistence, preferential processing in the MHCII-loading compartment and pronounced trogocytosis by T helper cells. TEX is present in tumor patients' sera. TEX, recovered and enriched from patients' sera, might well provide an optimized, individual-specific antigen source for DC-loading and vaccination.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ijc.29100

Improved vaccine efficacy of tumor exosome compared to tumor lysate loaded dendritic cells in mice.

A blockade of CD44 is considered a therapeutic option for the elimination of leukemia initiating cells. However, anti-panCD44 can interfere with hematopoiesis. Therefore we explored, whether a CD44 variant isoform (CD44v)-specific antibody can inhibit leukemia growth without attacking hematopoiesis. As a model we used CD44v10 transfected EL4 thymoma cells (EL4-v10). The therapeutic efficacy of anti-panCD44 and anti-CD44v10 was evaluated after intravenous application of EL4/EL4-v10. Ex vivo and in vitro studies evaluated the impact of anti-panCD44 and anti-CD44v10 as well as of EL4 and EL4-v10 on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in cocultures with bone marrow stroma cells with a focus on adhesion, migration, cell cycle progression and apoptosis resistance. Intravenously injected EL4-v10 grow in bone marrow and spleen. Anti-panCD44 and, more pronounced anti-CD44v10 prolong the survival time. The higher efficacy of anti-CD44v10 compared to anti-panCD44 does not rely on stronger antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity or on promoting EL4-v10 apoptosis. Instead, EL4 compete with HSC niche embedding. This has consequences on quiescence and apoptosis-protecting signals provided by the stroma. Anti-panCD44, too, more efficiently affected embedding of HSC than of EL4 in the bone marrow stroma. EL4-v10, by catching osteopontin, migrated on bone marrow stroma and did not or weakly interfere with HSC adhesion. Anti-CD44v10, too, did not affect the HSC – bone marrow stroma crosstalk. The therapeutic effect of anti-panCD44 and anti-CD44v10 is based on stimulation of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The superiority of anti-CD44v10 is partly due to blocking CD44v10-stimulated osteopontin expression that could drive HSC out of the niche. However, the main reason for the superiority of anti-CD44v10 relies on neither EL4-v10 nor anti-CD44v10 severely interfering with HSC – stroma cell interactions that, on the other hand, are affected by EL4 and anti-panCD44. Anti-panCD44 disturbing HSC embedding in the osteogenic niche weakens its therapeutic effect towards EL4. Thus, as far as leukemic cells express CD44v isoforms, the therapeutic use of anti-panCD44 should be avoided in favor of CD44v-specific antibodies.

/pdf/cd44-standard-and-cd44v10-isoform-expression-on-leukemia-4wlpkmlb2s.pdf

CD44 standard and CD44v10 isoform expression on leukemia cells distinctly influences niche embedding of hematopoietic stem cells

An ATP-binding cassette transporter G2 (CgABCG2) regulates the haemocyte proliferation by modulating the G1/S phase transition of cell cycle in oyster Crassostrea gigas.

An IRF2BP member (CgIRF2BP) involved in negative regulation of CgIFNLP expression in oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Background Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an essential epigenetic regulator of hematopoietic differentiation, which can specifically mono-methylate H3K4 (H3K4me1) and di-methylate H3K4 (H3K4me2) as a transcriptional corepressor. Previous reports have been suggested that it participated in hematopoiesis and embryonic development process. Here, a conserved LSD1 (CgLSD1) with a SWIRM domain and an amino oxidase (AO) domain was identified from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Methods We conducted a comprehensive analysis by various means to verify the function of CgLSD1 in hematopoietic process, including quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, western blot analysis, immunofluorescence assay, RNA interference (RNAi) and flow cytometry. Results The qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the transcripts of CgLSD1 were widely expressed in oyster tissues with the highest level in the mantle. And the transcripts of CgLSD1 were ubiquitously expressed during larval development with the highest expression level at the early D-veliger larvae stage. In hemocytes after Vibrio splendidus stimulation, the transcripts of CgLSD1 were significantly downregulated at 3, 6, 24, and 48 h with the lowest level at 3 h compared to that in the Seawater group (SW group). Immunocytochemical analysis showed that CgLSD1 was mainly distributed in the nucleus of hemocytes. After the CgLSD1 was knocked down by RNAi, the H3K4me1 and H3K4me2 methylation level significantly increased in hemocyte protein. Besides, the percentage of hemocytes with EdU-positive signals in the total circulating hemocytes significantly increased after V. splendidus stimulation. After RNAi of CgLSD1, the expression of potential granulocyte markers CgSOX11 and CgAATase as well as oyster cytokine-like factor CgAstakine were increased significantly in mRNA level, while the transcripts of potential agranulocyte marker CgCD9 was decreased significantly after V. splendidus stimulation. Conclusion The above results demonstrated that CgLSD1 was a conserved member of lysine demethylate enzymes that regulate hemocyte proliferation during the hematopoietic process.

/pdf/histone-lysine-specific-demethylase-1-regulates-the-30eay0iz.pdf

Xiaoyu Gu

Papers

Improved vaccine efficacy of tumor exosome compared to tumor lysate loaded dendritic cells in mice.

CD44 standard and CD44v10 isoform expression on leukemia cells distinctly influences niche embedding of hematopoietic stem cells

An ATP-binding cassette transporter G2 (CgABCG2) regulates the haemocyte proliferation by modulating the G1/S phase transition of cell cycle in oyster Crassostrea gigas.

An IRF2BP member (CgIRF2BP) involved in negative regulation of CgIFNLP expression in oyster Crassostrea gigas.

Histone lysine-specific demethylase 1 regulates the proliferation of hemocytes in the oyster Crassostrea gigas