[신간의 별자리x] 우리/미술, 그리고 ‘슬픔의 박물관’

Organismal life encounters reactive oxidants from internal metabolism and environmental toxicant exposure. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species cause oxidative stress and are traditionally viewed as being harmful. On the other hand, controlled production of oxidants in normal cells serves useful purposes to regulate signaling pathways. Reactive oxidants are counterbalanced by complex antioxidant defense systems regulated by a web of pathways to ensure that the response to oxidants is adequate for the body's needs. A recurrent theme in oxidant signaling and antioxidant defense is reactive cysteine thiol–based redox signaling. The nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) is an emerging regulator of cellular resistance to oxidants. Nrf2 controls the basal and induced expression of an array of antioxidant response element–dependent genes to regulate the physiological and pathophysiological outcomes of oxidant exposure. This review discusses the impact of Nrf2 on oxidative stress and toxicity and how...

/pdf/role-of-nrf2-in-oxidative-stress-and-toxicity-2utmvoa3ko.pdf

Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity.

The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism

With the release of the landmark report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in 2007, precipitated a major change in the way toxicity testing is conducted. It envisions increased efficiency in toxicity testing and decreased animal usage by transitioning from current expensive and lengthy in vivo testing with qualitative endpoints to in vitro toxicity pathway assays on human cells or cell lines using robotic high-throughput screening with mechanistic quantitative parameters. Risk assessment in the exposed human population would focus on avoiding significant perturbations in these toxicity pathways. Computational systems biology models would be implemented to determine the dose-response models of perturbations of pathway function. Extrapolation of in vitro results to in vivo human blood and tissue concentrations would be based on pharmacokinetic models for the given exposure condition. This practice would enhance human relevance of test results, and would cover several test agents, compared to traditional toxicological testing strategies. As all the tools that are necessary to implement the vision are currently available or in an advanced stage of development, the key prerequisites to achieving this paradigm shift are a commitment to change in the scientific community, which could be facilitated by a broad discussion of the vision, and obtaining necessary resources to enhance current knowledge of pathway perturbations and pathway assays in humans and to implement computational systems biology models. Implementation of these strategies would result in a new toxicity testing paradigm firmly based on human biology.

https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=acwp_arte

Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy

The Keap1–Nrf2 regulatory pathway plays a central role in the protection of cells against oxidative and xenobiotic damage. Under unstressed conditions, Nrf2 is constantly ubiquitinated by the Cul3–Keap1 ubiquitin E3 ligase complex and rapidly degraded in proteasomes. Upon exposure to electrophilic and oxidative stresses, reactive cysteine residues of Keap1 become modified, leading to a decline in the E3 ligase activity, stabilization of Nrf2 and robust induction of a battery of cytoprotective genes. Biochemical and structural analyses have revealed that the intact Keap1 homodimer forms a cherry-bob structure in which one molecule of Nrf2 associates with two molecules of Keap1 by using two binding sites within the Neh2 domain of Nrf2. This two-site binding appears critical for Nrf2 ubiquitination. In many human cancers, missense mutations in KEAP1 and NRF2 genes have been identified. These mutations disrupt the Keap1–Nrf2 complex activity involved in ubiquitination and degradation of Nrf2 and result in constitutive activation of Nrf2. Elevated expression of Nrf2 target genes confers advantages in terms of stress resistance and cell proliferation in normal and cancer cells. Discovery and development of selective Nrf2 inhibitors should make a critical contribution to improved cancer therapy.

https://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2010.01473.x

Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution.

Nrf2 signaling pathway: Pivotal roles in inflammation.

The NF-E2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) regulates cytoprotective genes that contain an antioxidant response element (ARE) in their promoters. To investigate whether anticancer drugs can induce ARE-driven gene expression, we have developed a stable human mammary MCF7-derived reporter cell line called AREc32, which contains a luciferase gene construct controlled by eight copies of the cis-element. In these cells, luciferase activity was increased up to 50-fold following treatment with 50 mumol/L tert-butylhydroquinone (t-BHQ). Basal and inducible luciferase activities in AREc32 cells were increased by forced overexpression of Nrf2 and reduced by knockdown of endogenous Nrf2 expression with RNA interference. Depletion of cellular reduced glutathione (GSH) by treatment of AREc32 cells with l-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine (BSO) did not influence basal levels of luciferase activity, but pretreatment with BSO augmented induction of luciferase activity by t-BHQ. Induction of reporter activity by t-BHQ in AREc32 cells was suppressed markedly by the antioxidants N-acetylcysteine and GSH but only modestly by vitamins C or E, suggesting that ARE-luciferase expression is induced primarily by thiol-active electrophiles rather than free radicals. The anticancer drugs cisplatin, etoposide, mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, melphalan, and carmustine [1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU)] weakly induced luciferase activity in AREc32 cells. Moreover, treatment of AREc32 cells with BSO immediately before exposure to anticancer drugs enhanced induction of ARE-driven luciferase activity by cisplatin, BCNU, chlorambucil, and melphalan and also induced endogenous AKR1C (AKR1C refers to AKR1C1 and AKR1C2), a target gene of Nrf2. Our findings show that Nrf2 can be activated by certain anticancer agents, and this will influence the effectiveness of chemotherapy.

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/66/22/10983.full.pdf

Generation of a Stable Antioxidant Response Element–Driven Reporter Gene Cell Line and Its Use to Show Redox-Dependent Activation of Nrf2 by Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents

Luteolin inhibits Nrf2 leading to negative regulation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway and sensitization of human lung carcinoma A549 cells to therapeutic drugs.

Isothiocyanates and phenolic antioxidants can prevent cancer through activation of Nrf2 (NF-E2 p45-related factor 2), a transcription factor that controls expression of cytoprotective genes through the antioxidant response element (ARE) enhancer. Using a human mammary MCF7-derived AREc32 reporter cell line, we now report that all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), and other retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) agonists, markedly reduces the ability of Nrf2 to mediate induction of ARE-driven genes by cancer chemopreventive agents including the metabolite of butylated hydroxyanisole, tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ). The basal and tBHQ-inducible expression of aldo-keto reductase (AKR) AKR1C1 and AKR1C2 genes, which are regulated by Nrf2, was also repressed by ATRA in AREc32 cells. Antagonists of RARα augmented induction of ARE-driven gene expression by tBHQ, as did knockdown of RARα by using RNAi. The expression of the ARE-gene battery was increased in the small intestine of mice fed on a vitamin A-deficient diet, and this increase was repressed by administration of ATRA. By contrast, in the small intestine of Nrf2 null mice, the expression of ARE-driven genes was not affected by vitamin A status. In MCF7 cells, ATRA did not block the nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 but reduced the binding of Nrf2 to the ARE enhancer as a consequence of forming a complex with RARα. These data suggest that cross-talk between Nrf2 and RARα could markedly influence the sensitivity of cells to electrophiles and oxidative stressors and, as a consequence, to carcinogenesis.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/104/49/19589.full.pdf

Identification of retinoic acid as an inhibitor of transcription factor Nrf2 through activation of retinoic acid receptor alpha

The transcription factor NRF2 (NFE2L2) is a pivotal activator of genes encoding cytoprotective and detoxifying enzymes that limit the action of cytotoxic therapies in cancer. NRF2 acts by binding antioxidant response elements (ARE) in its target genes, but there is relatively limited knowledge about how it is negatively controlled. Here, we report that retinoic X receptor alpha (RXRα) is a hitherto unrecognized repressor of NRF2. RNAi-mediated knockdown of RXRα increased basal ARE-driven gene expression and induction of ARE-driven genes by the NRF2 activator tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ). Conversely, overexpression of RXRα decreased ARE-driven gene expression. Biochemical investigations showed that RXRα interacts physically with NRF2 in cancer cells and in murine small intestine and liver tissues. Furthermore, RXRα bound to ARE sequences in the promoters of NRF2-regulated genes. RXRα loading onto AREs was concomitant with the presence of NRF2, supporting the hypothesis that a direct interaction between the two proteins on gene promoters accounts for the antagonism of ARE-driven gene expression. Mutation analyses revealed that interaction between the two transcription factors involves the DNA-binding domain of RXRα and a region comprising amino acids 209-316 in human NRF2 that had not been defined functionally, but that we now designate as the NRF2-ECH homology (Neh) 7 domain. In non-small cell lung cancer cells where NRF2 levels are elevated, RXRα expression downregulated NRF2 and sensitized cells to the cytotoxic effects of therapeutic drugs. In summary, our findings show that RXRα diminishes cytoprotection by NRF2 by binding directly to the newly defined Neh7 domain in NRF2.

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/73/10/3097.full.pdf

Xiu Jun Wang

Papers

Nrf2 signaling pathway: Pivotal roles in inflammation.

Generation of a Stable Antioxidant Response Element–Driven Reporter Gene Cell Line and Its Use to Show Redox-Dependent Activation of Nrf2 by Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents

Luteolin inhibits Nrf2 leading to negative regulation of the Nrf2/ARE pathway and sensitization of human lung carcinoma A549 cells to therapeutic drugs.

Identification of retinoic acid as an inhibitor of transcription factor Nrf2 through activation of retinoic acid receptor alpha

RXRα Inhibits the NRF2-ARE Signaling Pathway through a Direct Interaction with the Neh7 Domain of NRF2