Long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus is the primary experimental model for investigating the synaptic basis of learning and memory in vertebrates. The best understood form of long-term potentiation is induced by the activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex. This subtype of glutamate receptor endows long-term potentiation with Hebbian characteristics, and allows electrical events at the postsynaptic membrane to be transduced into chemical signals which, in turn, are thought to activate both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms to generate a persistent increase in synaptic strength.

A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus

Damage to the hippocampal system disrupts recent memory but leaves remote memory intact. The account presented here suggests that memories are first stored via synaptic changes in the hippocampal system, that these changes support reinstatement of recent memories in the neocortex, that neocortical synapses change a little on each reinstatement, and that remote memory is based on accumulated neocortical changes. Models that learn via changes to connections help explain this organization. These models discover the structure in ensembles of items if learning of each item is gradual and interleaved with learning about other items. This suggests that the neocortex learns slowly to discover the structure in ensembles of experiences. The hippocampal system permits rapid learning of new items without disrupting this structure, and reinstatement of new memories interleaves them with others to integrate them into structured neocortical memory systems.

Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.

Activity-driven modifications in synaptic connections between neurons in the neocortex may occur during development and learning In dual whole-cell voltage recordings from pyramidal neurons, the coincidence of postsynaptic action potentials (APs) and unitary excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) was found to induce changes in EPSPs Their average amplitudes were differentially up- or down-regulated, depending on the precise timing of postsynaptic APs relative to EPSPs These observations suggest that APs propagating back into dendrites serve to modify single active synaptic connections, depending on the pattern of electrical activity in the pre- and postsynaptic neurons

/pdf/regulation-of-synaptic-efficacy-by-coincidence-of-9xdfwoq1ss.pdf

Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs

Hebbian models of development and learning require both activity-dependent synaptic plasticity and a mechanism that induces competition between different synapses. One form of experimentally observed long-term synaptic plasticity, which we call spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), depends on the relative timing of pre- and postsynaptic action potentials. In modeling studies, we find that this form of synaptic modification can automatically balance synaptic strengths to make postsynaptic firing irregular but more sensitive to presynaptic spike timing. It has been argued that neurons in vivo operate in such a balanced regime. Synapses modifiable by STDP compete for control of the timing of postsynaptic action potentials. Inputs that fire the postsynaptic neuron with short latency or that act in correlated groups are able to compete most successfully and develop strong synapses, while synapses of longer-latency or less-effective inputs are weakened.

/pdf/competitive-hebbian-learning-through-spike-timing-dependent-17innjp0ag.pdf

Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity

Synaptic plasticity provides the basis for most models of learning, memory and development in neural circuits. To generate realistic results, synapse-specific Hebbian forms of plasticity, such as long-term potentiation and depression, must be augmented by global processes that regulate overall levels of neuronal and network activity. Regulatory processes are often as important as the more intensively studied Hebbian processes in determining the consequences of synaptic plasticity for network function. Recent experimental results suggest several novel mechanisms for regulating levels of activity in conjunction with Hebbian synaptic modification. We review three of them-synaptic scaling, spike-timing dependent plasticity and synaptic redistribution-and discuss their functional implications.

Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast

The conditions responsible for the associative properties of long-term potentiation (LTP) were examined in the CA1 region of the hippocampal slice preparation. Intracellularly recorded EPSPs resulting from single-volley stimulation at low frequency (0.15-0.1 Hz) in the stratum radiatum or oriens were paired with depolarizing current pulses (50-100 msec) injected through the recording microelectrode. It is shown that these EPSPs, when paired with pulses of sufficient magnitude, become potentiated. This potentiation generally reached a peak after 20-30 pairing events and could outlast the conditioning period by more than 1 hr. It was specific to the paired input, was blocked by 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (APV) and was largely blocked by prior homosynaptic tetanization (and vice versa). In experiments performed with picrotoxin (PTX) in the bath, EPSPs were potentiated using 2-4 nA current pulses, with somewhat higher values in normal solution. The effective current pulses, in both normal and PTX solution, produced a repetitive spike discharge of 7-11 spikes (per 100 msec), and within this range, higher frequencies were associated with larger potentiations. However, since similar degrees of EPSP potentiation were observed following blockade of spike activity by intracellular QX-314, spike activity was not the primary conditioning factor. For the potentiation to appear, the EPSP had to occur together with the current pulse or precede it by less than about 100 msec. No potentiation was observed when the EPSP immediately succeeded the pulse. The results suggest that the cooperativity aspect of LTP is related to a need for sufficient postsynaptic depolarization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/7/3/774.full.pdf

Y.-Y. Huang

Papers

Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials

Hippocampal long‐term potentiation is induced by pairing single afferent volleys with intracellular^ injected depolarizing current pulses

Mode of action of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on hippocampal long-lasting potentiation.

A synaptic potential following single volleys in the hippocampal CA1 region possibly involved in the induction of long lasting potentiation

Facilitated induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation in slices perfused with low concentrations of magnesium