다중혈관 관상동맥 환자에서 y-문합을 이용하여 양쪽 내흉동맥만을 사용한 우회술의 조기 성적

The US EPA considers glyphosate as “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A).” EPA asserts that there is no convincing evidence that “glyphosate induces mutations in vivo via the oral route.” IARC concludes there is “strong evidence” that exposure to glyphosate is genotoxic through at least two mechanisms known to be associated with human carcinogens (DNA damage, oxidative stress). Why and how did EPA and IARC reach such different conclusions? A total of 52 genotoxicity assays done by registrants were cited by the EPA in its 2016 evaluation of technical glyphosate, and another 52 assays appeared in the public literature. Of these, one regulatory assay (2%) and 35 published assays (67%) reported positive evidence of a genotoxic response. In the case of formulated, glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), 43 regulatory assays were cited by EPA, plus 65 assays published in peer-reviewed journals. Of these, none of the regulatory, and 49 published assays (75%) reported evidence of a genotoxic response following exposure to a GBH. IARC considered a total of 118 genotoxicity assays in six core tables on glyphosate technical, GBHs, and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), glyphosate’s primary metabolite. EPA’s analysis encompassed 51 of these 118 assays (43%). In addition, IARC analyzed another 81 assays exploring other possible genotoxic mechanisms (mostly related to sex hormones and oxidative stress), of which 62 (77%) reported positive results. IARC placed considerable weight on three positive GBH studies in exposed human populations, whereas EPA placed little or no weight on them. EPA and IARC reached diametrically opposed conclusions on glyphosate genotoxicity for three primary reasons: (1) in the core tables compiled by EPA and IARC, the EPA relied mostly on registrant-commissioned, unpublished regulatory studies, 99% of which were negative, while IARC relied mostly on peer-reviewed studies of which 70% were positive (83 of 118); (2) EPA’s evaluation was largely based on data from studies on technical glyphosate, whereas IARC’s review placed heavy weight on the results of formulated GBH and AMPA assays; (3) EPA’s evaluation was focused on typical, general population dietary exposures assuming legal, food-crop uses, and did not take into account, nor address generally higher occupational exposures and risks. IARC’s assessment encompassed data from typical dietary, occupational, and elevated exposure scenarios. More research is needed on real-world exposures to the chemicals within formulated GBHs and the biological fate and consequences of such exposures.

How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?

Microplastic accumulation via trophic transfer: Can a predatory crab counter the adverse effects of microplastics by body defence?

One of the most controversial societal issues today, regarding pesticide registration in the European Union (EU) may be the case surrounding re-registration of the active herbicide ingredient glyphosate. Shortly before the announcement of the conflicting views regarding the carcinogenicity status of this regulated agrochemical by EU Agencies, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on the one hand, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) on the other hand, the Cancer Assessment Review Committee of the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) also published re-evaluations. The US EPA assessment classified glyphosate into Group E, “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans”. Similar positions were reached by EFSA and ECHA, assessing glyphosate as “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans” and “not classified as a carcinogen”, respectively. A strongly opposing evaluation has previously been reached by IARC by classifying glyphosate into Group 2A, “probably carcinogenic to humans”. IARC identified potential cancer hazards in this case, but did not estimate the level of risk it may present, which was taken into consideration by opposing agencies. Multiple effects of glyphosate have been reported, of which carcinogenic effects are only one component. Formulated glyphosate products – especially with polyethoxylated tallowamine and related compounds – have been shown to cause stronger cytotoxic or endocrine disrupting effects than the active ingredient glyphosate alone. Questions related to hazards and corresponding risks identified in relation to this active ingredient and its formulated herbicide preparations divide scientific circles and official health and environmental authorities and organizations, and touch upon fundamental aspects of risk assessment and product regulation. The decision has to consider both hazard-based (IARC) and risk-based analysis (EFSA); the former may not be suitable to calculate practical significances, and the latter being challenged if exposure estimations are uncertain in light of new data on residue levels. The results of current analytical surveys on surface water are particularly worrisome. In turn, the precautionary principle appears to be the optimal approach in this case for regulation in the EU.

/pdf/re-registration-challenges-of-glyphosate-in-the-european-tqquh2yxxx.pdf

Re-registration Challenges of Glyphosate in the European Union

The protective effects of melatonin on oxidative damage and the immune system of the Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) exposed to deltamethrin.

Effects of glyphosate on immune responses and haemocyte DNA damage of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis.

Assessment of the oxidative and genotoxic effects of the glyphosate-based herbicide roundup on the freshwater shrimp, Macrobrachium nipponensis.

Antioxidative status, immunological responses, and heat shock protein expression in hepatopancreas of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis under the exposure of glyphosate.

The oxidative stress and genotoxic effect of deltamethrin on the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis were assessed using several commonly used biomarkers in this study. The results showed that the 48 h and 96 h LC50 values of deltamethrin to E. sinensis were 2.319 and 1.164 μg/L, respectively, and the safe concentration was 0.293 μg/L. According to these results, deltamethrin was applied at concentrations of 1/16, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2 and 1/1 96 h LC50 for 8 d in an exposure experiment. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) increased remarkably at 1 d, but decreased at 4 d in concentration group of 1/4, 1/2 and 1/1 LC50, whereas catalase (CAT) activity decreased during the exposure. The total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) at the concentrations of 1/4, 1/8 and 1/16 LC50 increased significantly at 1 d or 2 d respectively, whereas it decreased gradually until the end of the experiment under the concentrations above 1/4 LC50. The oxidative stress products malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in serum increased significantly at each concentration except H2O2 at concentration of 1/16 LC50. Additionally, the micronucleus (MN) frequency of haemocytes increased at the concentrations of 1/4, 1/2 and 1/1 LC50 throughout the exposure, similar trend was observed in the comet ratio and percentage of tail-DNA (%DNA) in haemocytes. These results revealed that deltamethrin had a prominent toxic effect on E. sinensis based on antioxidative response inhibition and genotoxicity that was possibly due to lipid peroxidation (LPO) induced by oxidative products, and the accumulation of peroxide, even under a sublethal concentration.

Oxidative stress and genotoxic effect of deltamethrin exposure on the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis

The invention relates to an Eriocheir hepatopancreas cell separation and primary culture method. The method comprises the following steps: (1) cleaning Eriocheir pancreatic tissues with cell separation liquid, cutting the cleaned Eriocheir pancreatic tissues to tissue blocks of 1mm with a shear, adding a proper quantity of tissue blocks into the separation liquid, blowing and filtering with a suction tube, and centrifuging the filtrate to obtain yellow precipitate; (2) adding the yellow precipitate into a culture medium containing 100UI/ml penicillin and 100mug/ml streptomycin, blowing uniformly, inoculating into a culture plate, and culturing in a CO2 cell incubator. By adopting the method, Eriocheir hepatopancreas cells can be stably cultured till the survival rate with 72 hours is higher than 50 percent, a theoretical basis is laid for building of a subsequent cell line, and a cell tool is provided for researches in relevant fields of cell physiology, gene engineering and the like.

Yi Huang

Papers

Effects of glyphosate on immune responses and haemocyte DNA damage of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis.

Assessment of the oxidative and genotoxic effects of the glyphosate-based herbicide roundup on the freshwater shrimp, Macrobrachium nipponensis.

Antioxidative status, immunological responses, and heat shock protein expression in hepatopancreas of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis under the exposure of glyphosate.

Oxidative stress and genotoxic effect of deltamethrin exposure on the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis

Eriocheir hepatopancreas cell separation and primary culture method