scispace - formally typeset
Y

Yotam Shem-Tov

Researcher at University of California, Los Angeles

Publications -  10
Citations -  71

Yotam Shem-Tov is an academic researcher from University of California, Los Angeles. The author has contributed to research in topics: Criminal justice & Recidivism. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 7 publications receiving 38 citations. Previous affiliations of Yotam Shem-Tov include University of California, Berkeley.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Entrepreneurs’ negotiation behavior

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared persuasive behaviors and negotiation outcomes of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs in a series of negotiation tasks and found that entrepreneurs make extensive use of emotions and arguments as means of persuasion.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Does Incarceration Affect Reoffending? Estimating the Dose-Response Function

TL;DR: It is found that incarceration has meaningful reoffending-reducing average effects that diminish in incarceration length, and budget-neutral reductions in sentence length combined with increases in incarceration rates can decrease recidivism.
Posted Content

Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence From the Make-it-Right Program

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors studied the effect of a restorative justice intervention targeted at youth ages 13 to 17 facing felony charges of medium severity (e.g., burglary, assault).
ReportDOI

The Effects of Teacher Quality on Adult Criminal Justice Contact

TL;DR: The authors found that teachers who reduce suspensions and improve attendance substantially reduce future criminal justice contact (CJC) and that the development of non-cognitive skills is central to the returns to education for crime and highlight an important dimension of teachers' social value missed by test score-based quality metrics.
Journal ArticleDOI

A note on fairness and personalised pricing

TL;DR: In this article, normal everyday consumers play the role of sellers who have access to consumers' data (and willingness to pay) and a strong finding of behaviour in this setup is that subjects charge a fixed percentage (approximately 64%) of the willingness to PAY from each of their subjects, leading to a fair, whilst uneven, distribution of prices.