Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures provides requirements for general structural design and includes means for determining dead, live, soil, flood, wind, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, and earthquake loads, as well as their combinations, which are suitable for inclusion in building codes and other documents. This Standard, a revision of ASCE/SEI 7-05, offers a complete update and reorganization of the wind load provisions, expanding them from one chapter into six. The Standard contains new ultimate event wind maps with corresponding reductions in load factors, so that the loads are not affected, and updates the seismic loads with new risk-targeted seismic maps. The snow, live, and atmospheric icing provisions are updated as well. In addition, the Standard includes a detailed Commentary with explanatory and supplementary information designed to assist building code committees and regulatory authorities. Standard ASCE/SEI 7 is an integral part of building codes in the United States. Many of the load provisions are substantially adopted by reference in the International Building Code and the NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code. Structural engineers, architects, and those engaged in preparing and administering local building codes will find this Standard an essential reference in their practice. Note: New orders are fulfilled from the second printing, which incorporates the errata to the first printing.

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

The aerodynamic characteristics of train/vehicles under cross winds depend on not only the shapes of the vehicles but also those of infrastructures. Accordingly three kinds of wind tunnel tests were made to evaluate the aerodynamic characteristics of typical configurations of the vehicles on typical configurations of infrastructures such as bridges and embankments. The main results obtained from the wind tunnel tests are summarized below. 1. The aerodynamic side force coefficient of the vehicle increases more as the thickness of the bridge girder becomes larger. It also increases more as the roof of the vehicle becomes edgier. 2. The aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicle on the embankment depend on the distribution of the boundary layer on the ground. The aerodynamic side force coefficient of the vehicle on a high embankment is larger than that on a low embankment.

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Train/Vehicles under Cross Winds

China’s high-speed railway (HSR) construction industry has been experiencing a golden period of opportunities in the recent decades. Due to the necessity of protecting arable lands and the advantage of rapid construction, bridges (elevated structures) are predominantly used in China’s HSRs, which must meet the critical small settlement requirement. This article first reviews the main technical standards of small- to medium-span HSR bridges, where their comparison with the Japanese standard and International Union of Railway standards is highlighted. Then, the long-span HSR steel bridges are described and discussed case by case. Based on the engineering practice of HSRs, the main achievements and key technologies of HSR bridges in China are provided, followed by the opportunities and challenges of the current and future developments of HSR bridges.

Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China

Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind

Predicting wind pressures around circular cylinders using machine learning techniques

http://or.nsfc.gov.cn/bitstream/00001903-5/291838/1/1000008684429.pdf

Aerodynamic characteristics of a trailing rail vehicles on viaduct based on still wind tunnel experiments

An adjustable, louver-type wind barrier was introduced in this study for improving the running safety and ride comfort of train on the bridge under the undesirable wind environment. The aerodynamic characteristics of both train and bridge due to this novel wind barrier was systematically investigated based on the wind tunnel tests. It is suggested that rotation angles of the adjustable blade of the louver-type wind barrier should be controlled within 90 to achieve an effective solution in terms of the overall aerodynamic performance of the train. Compared to the traditional grid-type wind barrier, the louver-type wind barrier generally presents better aerodynamic performance. Specifically, the larger decrease of the lift force and overturn moment of the train and the smaller increase of the drag force and torsional moment of the bridge resulting from the louver-type wind barrier were highlighted. Finally, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique was applied to explore the underlying mechanism of aerodynamic control using the proposed wind barrier.

Aerodynamic performance of a novel wind barrier for train-bridge system

This paper investigates the effect of a wind barrier on the aerodynamic performance of a train–bridge system under crosswind using a numerical simulation method. The studied bridge is a long-span c...

Effect of wind barriers on the flow field and aerodynamic forces of a train–bridge system:

Accurately quantifying the aerodynamic forces acting on vehicles and long-span bridges is critical for assessing the safety of moving vehicles on bridges which are subjected to strong wind. It is n...

Yunfeng Zou

Papers

Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China

Aerodynamic characteristics of a trailing rail vehicles on viaduct based on still wind tunnel experiments

Aerodynamic performance of a novel wind barrier for train-bridge system

Effect of wind barriers on the flow field and aerodynamic forces of a train–bridge system:

Wind tunnel tests on the aerodynamic characteristics of vehicles on highway bridges