Showing papers by "American Association for the Advancement of Science published in 1983"
TL;DR: The promise of the stakeholder approach to evaluation lies in its potential to overcome shortcomings identified by critics: that evaluation is too narrow, unrealistic in its standards for success, unfair to program staff and participants, and irrelevant to decision makers.
Abstract: The promise of the stakeholder approach to evaluation lies in its potential to overcome shortcomings identified by critics: that evaluation is too narrow, unrealistic in its standards for success, unfair to program staff and participants, and irrelevant to decision makers.
145 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the assumptions that underlie the stakeholder approach suggest that some claims are cogent and others are problematical, and the assumptions are discussed in detail in detail.
Abstract: Analysis of the assumptions that underlie the stakeholder approach suggest that some claims are cogent and others are problematical.
81 citations
TL;DR: The authors argue that the free flow of scientific information allows adversaries of the United States to grow stronger at our expense and that the imposition of controls, however, may undermine US vitality and progress.
Abstract: Administration officials argue that the free flow of scientific information allows adversaries of the United States to grow stronger at our expense The imposition of controls, however, may undermine US vitality and progress
2 citations