scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development

About: Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Drug development & Clinical trial. The organization has 78 authors who have published 258 publications receiving 16047 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using the Fama-French three factor model, the cost of drug development is found to be higher than the earlier estimate, and the authors' base case estimate was $802 million.
Abstract: In a widely cited article, DiMasi, Hansen, and Grabowski (2003) estimate the average pre-tax cost of bringing a new molecular entity to market. Their base case estimate, excluding post-marketing studies, was $802 million (in $US 2000). Strikingly, almost half of this cost (or $399 million) is the cost of capital (COC) used to fund clinical development expenses to the point of FDA marketing approval. The authors used an 11% real COC computed using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). But the CAPM is a single factor risk model, and multi-factor risk models are the current state of the art in finance. Using the Fama-French three factor model we find that the cost of drug development to be higher than the earlier estimate.

105 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using analysis of development and patent filing histories of entrants to new drug classes in the past five decades, new evidence is provided that the development of multiple new drugs in a given class is better characterized as a race, rather than the imitation of successful products.
Abstract: The development of 'follow on' or 'me too' drugs - generally defined as a drug with a similar chemical structure or the same mechanism of action as a drug that is already marketed - has attracted contrasting views. Some have argued that follow-on drugs often provide useful alternative or enhanced therapeutic options for particular patients or patient subpopulations, as well as introducing price competition. Others, however, consider that the development of such drugs is duplicative and that the resources needed would be better directed elsewhere. Implicit in some of this criticism is the notion that the development of me-too drugs is undertaken after a first-in-class drug has made it to market and proved commercially successful. In this Perspective, using analysis of development and patent filing histories of entrants to new drug classes in the past five decades, we provide new evidence that the development of multiple new drugs in a given class is better characterized as a race, rather than the imitation of successful products.

99 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2010-mAbs
TL;DR: This overview of the 26 mAbs provides a brief description of the background and the on-going Phase 3 studies of each mAb, and will serve as a baseline against which future progress can be measured.
Abstract: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a burgeoning class of therapeutics, with more than 25 approved in countries worldwide. Novel molecules are entering clinical study at a rate of nearly 40 per year, and the commercial pipeline includes approximately 240 mAb therapeutics in clinical studies that have not yet progressed to regulatory approval or been approved. Of particular interest are the 26 mAbs that are currently at Phase 3, when safety and efficacy data critical to approval is established. Phase 3 study lengths are typically two to four years, so results for some studies might be announced in 2010, but data from others might not be presented until 2014. This overview of the 26 candidates provides a brief description of the background and the on-going Phase 3 studies of each mAb. Additional mAbs that have progressed to regulatory review or been approved may also be in Phase 3 studies, but these, as well as Fc fusion proteins, have been excluded. Due to the large body of primary literature about the 26 candidates, only selected references are given, with a focus on recent publications and articles that were relevant to Phase 3 studies. Current as of October 2009, the results presented here will serve as a baseline against which future progress can be measured.

98 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Economics Working Group (EWG) within the Pediatric Formulation Initiative (PFI) of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development is to identify economic barriers and to propose possible mechanisms to create cost-effective and appropriately formulated products for off-patent pediatric drugs and to ensure their distribution and availability.

92 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development designed the recent study of the costs of new drug research and development to capture only the costs incurred by industry, but typically R&D efforts in the private and public sectors are complements, not substitutes.
Abstract: The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development designed the recent study of the costs of new drug research and development to capture only the costs incurred by industry, but typically R&D efforts in the private and public sectors are complements, not substitutes.

92 citations


Authors
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Amgen
13.7K papers, 804.4K citations

85% related

Pfizer
37.4K papers, 1.6M citations

84% related

Eli Lilly and Company
22.8K papers, 946.7K citations

84% related

GlaxoSmithKline
21.1K papers, 1.1M citations

83% related

AstraZeneca
23.4K papers, 938.2K citations

83% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20219
20208
201914
201815
201710
201611