Showing papers by "Universidad Manuela Beltrán published in 2003"

Cell biology, molecular embryology, Lamarckian and Darwinian selection as evolvability.

Abstract: The evolvability of vertebrate systems involves various mechanisms that eventually generate cooperative and nonlethal functional variation on which Darwinian selection can operate. It is a truism that to get vertebrate animals to develop a coherent machine they first had to inherit the right multicellular ontogeny. The ontogeny of a metazoan involves cell lineages that progressively deny their own capacity for increase and for totipotency in benefit of the collective interest of the individual. To achieve such cell altruism Darwinian dynamics rescinded its original unicellular mandate to reproduce. The distinction between heritability at the level of the cell lineage and at the level of the individual is crucial. However, its implications have seldom been explored in depth. While all out reproduction is the Darwinian measure of success among unicellular organisms, a high replication rate of cell lineages within the organism may be deleterious to the individual as a functional unit. If a harmoniously functioning unit is to evolve, mechanisms must have evolved whereby variants that increase their own replication rate by failing to accept their own somatic duties are controlled. For questions involving organelle origins, see Godelle and Reboud, 1995 and Hoekstra, 1990. In other words, modifiers of conflict that control cell lineages with conflicting genes and new mutant replication rates that deviate from their somatic duties had to evolve. Our thesis is that selection at the level of the (multicellular) individual must have opposed selection at the level of the cell lineage. The metazoan embryo is not immune to this conflict especially with the evolution of set-aside cells and other modes of self-policing modifiers (Blackstone and Ellison, 1998; Ransick et al., 1996. In fact, the conflict between the two selection processes permitted a Lamarckian soma-to-germline feedback loop. This new element in metazoan ontogeny became the evolvability of the vertebrate adaptive immune system and life as we know it now. We offer the hypothesis that metazoan evolution solved this ancient conflict by evolving an immunogenetic mechanism that responds with rapid Lamarckian efficiency by retaining the ancient reverse transcriptase enzyme (RNACopyright DNA copying discovered by Temin in 1959 (see Temin, 1989) and found in 1970 in RNA tumor viruses by Temin and Baltimore), which can produce cDNA from the genome of an RNA virus that infects the cells. It seems that molecular Lamarckism can survive (Lewin, 1993).

Evolution without speciation but with selection: LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor in Gilbert's RNA world.

Abstract: This is not an attempt to analyze the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) to understand the origin of living systems. We do not know what came before Gilberts' RNA world. Our analysis starts with the RNA world and with genes (biological replicators alla Dawkings) made up of RNA proteins with enzymatic catalytic functions within units that are not yet modern cells. We offer a scenario where cellular entities are very simple and without individuality; they are only simple primary units of selection (the first level of selection) in which replicators compete in the most Darwinian manner, totally deprived of cooperation and interactions among genes. The information processing system of this RNA world is inaccurate and inefficient when compared to that found in organisms that came later. Among the "genes" and the entities that harbor them, high mutation rate was the most prevalent source of variability and the only inheritance was through lateral gene transfer of mobile elements. There were no chromosomes or any other genomic organization. As millions of years accumulated, complex and organized biological structures and processes evolved thanks to the variability mustered up mostly by lateral gene transfers and mutations. With micro- and mini-satellites, lateral gene transfers became indispensable devices of selection to mold variability. Competition and Darwinian selection gave way to a new transition in evolution, one I consider ineluctable, in which cooperation among interactive genes prevailed for the sake of higher fitness. Compartmentalization constituted a major transition in evolution that spurted new types of genome organization. Minichromosomes is one of these; cellular membranes and cytoplasmic structures completed the picture of the primitive cell. However, the much talked about phylogenetic tree does not exit in that ancient LUCA. The tree has no organism at its base; only clusters of genes evoke a fragile beginning for the increasingly complex cell types that were to emerge later.

Non-Darwinian and Darwinian prokaryotic and eukaryotic evolution--an enigma in cell biology conservation.

Abstract: Our theory is embarrassingly simple. What made today's prokaryotes and modern cyanobacteria so robust is the fact that in their origin, back in the Archean (3 billion years ago), selection did not play a central role in evolution, it had only a transitory role. Asexual reproduction, mutation, drift and sampling variance in local demes were more important especially when they were accompanied by population catastrophes, where millions perished. Metazoans are generally macroscopic, sexually reproducing, ecologically specialized organisms whose history is full of extinctions and radiations leading to morphological change. On the other hand, prokaryotes, thanks to their origin, avoid extinction because as a group they have slowly evolved as generalists. Specialization appears to be less important than ecological versatility and metabolic unspecialization. Modern cyanobacteria keep on using that strategy.

La formación científica a través de la práctica de laboratorio

Abstract: Los trabajos practicos deberian reflejar las caracteristicas esenciales del trabajo cientifico y por tanto, contribuir a que los alumnos se familiaricen con la metodologia cientifica. Es esta, la razon que lidera la necesidad de realizar un estudio que permita indagar acerca de las concepciones que tienen los maestros y estudiantes acerca de las practicas de laboratorio y su concepcion como actividad investigativa. Sin embargo, una practica de laboratorio que pretenda aproximarse a una investigacion ha de dejar de ser un trabajo exclusivamente experimental e integrar otros aspectos de la actividad cientifica igualmente esenciales dentro de los programas de formacion profesional. En las instituciones de educacion superior, suele omitirse en su trivial desarrollo mencionar el paradigma preponderante de ensenanza-aprendizaje, aunque si revisaramos esta instancia, nos dariamos cuenta que es, sin lugar a dudas, el de transmision-recepcion de conocimientos, lo que dificulta el aprendizaje significativo. Si el interes esta dirigido a una educacion talante que familiarice a los estudiantes con la actividad cientifica, la docencia ha de ser de calidad y debera desarrollarse investigacion en el terreno de la ensenanza-aprendizaje de las ciencias; en esta docencia de la calidad, lo importante no es el conocimiento en si mismo, si no la capacidad para seguir aprendiendo aun sin la influencia del aparato educativo.