scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Drug Metabolism Reviews in 1992"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Acyl glucuronides Revisited: Is the Glucuronidation Proces a Toxification as well as a Detoxification Mechanism? Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 5-47 as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: (1992). Acyl Glucuronides Revisited: Is the Glucuronidation Proces a Toxification as Well as a Detoxification Mechanism? Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 5-47.

394 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Mechanism-Based Prevention of Paracetamol-Induced Hepatotoxicity and its Mechanism Based Prevention as mentioned in this paper was the first work to consider mechanism-based prevention.
Abstract: (1992). Molecular Aspects of Paracetamol-Induced Hepatotoxicity and its Mechanism-Based Prevention. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 367-407.

332 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is reasonable to speculate that reactive metabolites generated by activated leukocytes, or neutrophil precursors in the bone marrow, could be responsible for drug-induced agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia.
Abstract: Evidence strongly suggests that many adverse drug reactions, including idiosyncratic drug reactions, involve reactive metabolites. Furthermore, certain functional groups, which are readily oxidized to reactive metabolites, are associated with a high incidence of adverse reactions. Most drugs can probably form reactive metabolites, but a simple comparison of covalent binding in vitro is unlikely to provide an accurate indication of the relative risk of a drug causing an idiosyncratic reaction because it does not provide an indication of how efficiently the metabolite is detoxified in vivo. In addition, the incidence and nature of adverse reactions associated with a given drug is probably determined in large measure by the location of reactive metabolite formation, as well as the chemical reactivity of the reactive metabolite. Such factors will determine which macromolecules the metabolites will bind to, and it is known that covalent binding to some proteins, such as those in the leukocyte membrane, is much more likely to lead to an immune-mediated reaction or other type of toxicity. Some reactive metabolites, such as acyl glucuronides, circulate freely and could lead to adverse reactions in almost any organ; however, most reactive metabolites have a short biological half-life, and although small amounts may escape the organ where they are formed, these metabolites are unlikely to reach sufficient concentrations to cause toxicity in other organs. Many idiosyncratic drug reactions involve leukocytes, especially agranulocytosis and drug-induced lupus. We and others have demonstrated that drugs can be metabolized by activated neutrophils and monocytes to reactive metabolites. The major reaction appears to be reaction with leukocyte-generated hypochlorous acid. Hypochlorous acid is quite reactive, and therefore it is likely that many other drugs will be found that are metabolized by activated leukocytes. Some neutrophil precursors contain myeloperoxidase and the NADPH oxidase system, and it is likely that these cells can also oxidize drugs. Therefore, although there is no direct evidence, it is reasonable to speculate that reactive metabolites generated by activated leukocytes, or neutrophil precursors in the bone marrow, could be responsible for drug-induced agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia. This could involve direct toxicity or an immune-mediated reaction. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and it may be that both mechanisms contribute to the toxicity, even in the same patient. In the case of drug-induced lupus, a prevalent hypothesis for lupus involves modification of class II MHC antigens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

176 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of the Gastrointestinal Mucosa and Microflora in the Bioactivation of Dietary and Environmental Mutagens or Carcinogens was discussed in this paper, where the role of microflora was investigated.
Abstract: (1992). Role of the Gastrointestinal Mucosa and Microflora in the Bioactivation of Dietary and Environmental Mutagens or Carcinogens. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 425-492.

114 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, Xenobiotic Biotransfor Mation/Bioactivation in Organogenesis-Stage Conceptal Tissues: Implications for Embryotoxicity and Teratogenesis.
Abstract: (1992). Xenobiotic Biotransfor Mation/Bioactivation in Organogenesis-Stage Conceptal Tissues: Implications for Embryotoxicity and Teratogenesis. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 195-238.

97 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, comparative pharmacokinetic profiles of two Imidazopyridine drugs: Zolpidem and Alpidem are presented, and compared with two other drugs.
Abstract: (1992). Comparative Pharmacokinetic Profile of Two Imidazopyridine Drugs: Zolpidem and Alpidem. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 239-266.

86 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The utility of existing models of hepatic elimination will be critically assessed based upon their ability to account for the influence of the aforementioned physiological processes upon elimination; the data requirements of the model, in addition to its mathematical complexity and ease of use.
Abstract: The liver is, by nature, heterogeneous. It contains a complex vascular network for blood flow and a stationary phase consisting of enzymes within parenchymal cells. Several physiological processes, therefore, may combine to give observed ranges in drug elimination. Net changes in concentration are a consequence of a series of steps: uptake of substrate into liver cells, enzymatic reactions within the cells, release of metabolites and unconverted substrate from the cells into the sinusoids, and the net flow of the perfusing medium in the vasculature. In addition, substrate binding to proteins in the blood and in the liver can influence hepatic elimination. An understanding of each of these processes is necessary to fully comprehend the overall process of drug elimination, and these processes must be accounted for, either individually or by grouping and approximation, if a model for drug elimination is to be developed. Existing models of hepatic elimination may be classified according to their treatment of mixing within the vasculature and whether or not the model explicitly accounts for mass transfer between the heterogeneous phases of the liver. Four major classes may be defined: 1. Nonparametric homogeneous models, which assume that either complete mixing or no mixing occurs within the vasculature of the organ. 2. Homogeneous mixing models, which allow for a range of mixing phenomena. 3. Heterogeneous micromixing models, which allow for mass transport between the cells and vasculature and describe mixing within the vasculature on a microscopic level. 4. Heterogeneous compartmental models, which also describe interphase mass transfer but assume complete mixing on a microscopic level, and therefore use a time and spatially averaged approach to model mixing. The utility of these models of hepatic elimination will be critically assessed based upon (1) their ability to account for the influence of the aforementioned physiological processes upon elimination; (2) the data requirements of the model, in addition to its mathematical complexity and ease of use; and (3) the range of compounds and metabolites which may be described using the model.

28 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper is one leveler's attempt to address the following philosophical questions confronting pharmacokinetic modelers: What is the nature of reality, and what are some of the psychological characteristics of modelers?
Abstract: Generally speaking, there are two extremes of scientific personality types: sharpeners and levelers. Sharpeners, highly attuned to system differences and nuances, and always alert to distinctions, try hard to let nothing slip by them unnoticed. Levelers, on the other hand, attempt to submerge system differences, reveal uniform patterns, and condense disparate elements. This paper is one leveler's attempt to address the following philosophical questions confronting pharmacokinetic modelers: (1) What is the nature of reality? (2) What is a model? (3) Why do we model? (4) What are the different types of models? (5) How do we model? (6) What are the properties and characteristics of models? (7) How do we evaluate models? (8) What are some of the tricks and traps of modeling? And (9), what are some of the psychological characteristics of modelers?

25 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that the enhanced susceptibility of renal tubular epithelial cells to lead-induced mitogenicity at the levels comparable to those administered in the cancer bioassay may contribute to the carcinogenic response seen in this target organ.
Abstract: While lead acetate is a renal carcinogen in rodent studies, the mechanism by which it induces cancer has not been established. This report proposes that the enhanced susceptibility of renal tubular epithelial cells to lead-induced mitogenicity at the levels comparable to those administered in the cancer bioassay may contribute to the carcinogenic response seen in this target organ. Of relevance is that the nonresponsiveness of the liver to lead-induced carcinogenicity was associated with significantly less capacity (i.e., 675-fold) of lead to induce the mitogenic response in the rodent liver.

23 citations




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Information on the response of mink to several dozen toxic substances revealed that mink respond in a qualitatively and quantitatively similar manner to other more commonly employed species as well as humans.
Abstract: (1992). Mink as a Predictive Model in Toxicology. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 559-578.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: (1992).
Abstract: (1992). Pharmacology of Second Messengers: A Critical Appraisal. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 125-194.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Paxson Sherwin, American Pioneer in Drug Metabolism as mentioned in this paper, published 1992, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 493-530, as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: (1992). Carl Paxson Sherwin, American Pioneer in Drug Metabolism. Drug Metabolism Reviews: Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 493-530.