Showing papers in "Hernia in 2023"
3 citations
TL;DR: In this article , the authors used the Kaplan-Meier method for the comparison of time to diagnosis of parastomal hernia according to the presence of mesh vs. no-mesh and the technique of mesh insertion.
Abstract: Short-term results have been reported regarding parastomal hernia (PH) prevention with a permanent mesh. Long-term results are scarce. The objective was to assess the long-term PH occurrence after a prophylactic synthetic non-absorbable mesh.Long-term data of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected. The primary outcome was the detection of PH based exclusively on a radiological diagnosis by computed tomography (CT) performed during the long-term follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the comparison of time to diagnosis of PH according to the presence of mesh vs. no-mesh and the technique of mesh insertion: open retromuscular, laparoscopic keyhole, and laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker.We studied 121 patients (87 men, median age 70 years), 82 (67.8%) of which developed a PH. The median overall length of follow-up was 48.5 months [interquartile range (IQR) 14.4-104.9], with a median time until PH diagnosis of 17.7 months (IQR 9.3-49.0). The survival analysis did not show significant differences in the time to development of a PH according to the presence or absence of a prophylactic mesh neither in the overall study population (log-rank, P = 0.094) nor in the groups of each technique of mesh insertion, although according to the surgical technique, a higher reduction in the appearance of PH for the open retromuscular technique was found (log-rank, P = 0.001).In the long-term follow-up placement of a non-absorbable synthetic prophylactic mesh in the context of an elective end colostomy does not seem effective for preventing PH.
2 citations
2 citations
2 citations
2 citations
2 citations
1 citations
1 citations
TL;DR: In this paper , a retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral center for abdominal wall surgery, where a total of 259 patients were included of which 126 received a preconditioning program.
Abstract: Surgical site occurrences after transversus abdominis release in ventral hernia repair are still reported up to 15%. Evidence is rising that preoperative improvement of risk factors might contribute to optimal patient recovery. A reduction of complication rates up to 40% has been reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether prehabilitation has a favorable effect on the risk on wound and medical complications as well as on length of stay.A retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary referral center for abdominal wall surgery. All patients undergoing ventral hernia repair discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings between 2015 and 2019 were included. Patients referred for a preconditioning program by the MDT were compared to patients who were deemed fit for operative repair by the MDT, without such a program. Endpoints were patients, hernia, and procedure characteristics as well as length of hospital stay, wound and general complications.A total of 259 patients were included of which 126 received a preconditioning program. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were statistically significantly different as the prehabilitated group had higher median BMI (28 vs 30, p < 0.001), higher HbA1c (41 vs 48, p = 0.014), more smokers (4% vs 25%, p < 0.001) and higher HPW classes due to more patient factors (14% vs 48%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in intra-operative and postoperative outcome measures.This study showed prehabilitation facilitates patients with relevant comorbidities achieving the same results as patients without those risk factors. The indication of a preconditioning program might be effective at the discretion of an MDT meeting. Further research could focus on the extent of such program to assess its value.
1 citations
1 citations
TL;DR: A systematic review of the literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines of all studies reporting the outcomes following paediatric inguinal hernia repair where the technique was recorded as laparoscopic suture ligation alone (LS) or lap-oscopic sac division and suture Ligation (LSDS), studies were assessed for risk of bias and exclusion criteria included reported follow-up of less than 6 months as discussed by the authors .
Abstract: The use of laparoscopy for paediatric inguinal hernia repairs has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. However, there is significant variation in the reported recurrence rates in the literature, with many studies reporting higher rates than the open operation. This may be explained by the range of different techniques currently included under the term laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study is to determine whether dividing the hernia sac before ligation improves surgical outcomes following a paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compared to ligation alone.A systematic review of the literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines of all studies reporting the outcomes following paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair where the technique was recorded as laparoscopic suture ligation alone (LS) or laparoscopic sac division and suture ligation (LSDS). Studies were assessed for risk of bias and exclusion criteria included reported follow-up of less than 6 months.A total of 8518 LS repairs and 6272 LSDS repairs were included in the final analysis. LSDS repair was associated with a significantly lower recurrence rate (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of testicular ascent or atrophy.Recreating the open operation by hernia sac division followed by suture ligation significantly reduces the risk of hernia recurrence.
TL;DR: In this article , the authors compared a single surgeon's early experience transitioning from transabdominal hernia repair with sublay mesh in either the pre-peritoneal or retrorectus space (TA-SM) and enhanced-view totally extra-Peritoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia ventral repair in the peri-operative and long-term post-operative time periods.
Abstract: While robotic-assisted hernia repair has increased the popularity of minimally invasive hernia surgery, selecting between the types of approaches is a challenge for both experts and novices alike. In this study, we compared a single surgeon's early experience transitioning from transabdominal hernia repair with sublay mesh in either the pre-peritoneal or retrorectus space (TA-SM) and enhanced-view totally extra-peritoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair in the peri-operative and long-term post-operative time periods.We conducted a retrospective review of 50 eTEP and 108 TA-SM procedures to collect demographics, intraoperative details, and 30-day and 1-year post-operative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Chi-square analysis, Fisher's test, and two sample t-tests with equal variances.There were no significant differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. eTEP patients had larger defects (109.1 cm2 vs. 31.8 cm2, p = 0.043) and mesh used (432.8 cm2 vs. 137.9 cm2, p = 0.001). Operative times were equivalent (158.3 ± 90.6 min eTEP and 155.8 ± 65.2 min TA-SM, p = 0.84), but conversion to alternate procedure type was higher for the transabdominal approach (4% eTEP vs. 22% TA-SM, p < 0.05). Hospital stay was less in the eTEP cohort (1.3 days vs. 2.2 days, p < 0.05). Within 30 days, there were no significant differences in emergency visits or hospital readmissions. There was a greater propensity for eTEP patients to develop seromas (12.0% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.05). At 1 year, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate (4.56% eTEP vs. 12.2% TA-SM, p = 0.28) respective to average time to recurrence (9.17 months eTEP vs. 11.05 months TA-SM).The eTEP approach can be adopted safely and efficiently, and may have superior peri-operative outcomes including fewer conversions and reduced hospital stay.
TL;DR: In this article , the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency and planned hernia repair in Sweden was assessed by collecting data from Swedish Patient Register using procedural codes from January 2016 to December 2021.
Abstract: The COVID-19 has had a profound impact on the health care delivery in Sweden, including deprioritization of benign surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on emergency and planned hernia repair in Sweden.Data on hernia repairs from January 2016 to December 2021 were retrieved from the Swedish Patient Register using procedural codes. Two groups were formed: COVID-19 group (January 2020-December 2021) and control group (January 2016-December 2019). Demographic data on mean age, gender, and type of hernia were collected.This study showed a weak negative correlation between the number of elective hernia repairs performed each month during the pandemic and the number of emergency repairs carried out during the following 3 months for inguinal hernia repair (p = 0.114) and incisional hernia repair (p = 0.193), whereas there was no correlation for femoral or umbilical hernia repairs.The COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on planned hernia surgeries in Sweden, but our hypothesis that postponing planned repairs would increase the risk of emergency events was not supported.
TL;DR: In this article , a multivariable logistic regression model was used to specify predictors for pain reduction after mesh revision surgery in patients operated for inguinal hernia or pelvic organ prolapse with a polypropylene implant.
Abstract: Abstract Purpose With this retrospective case series, we aim to identify predictors for reduction of pain after mesh revision surgery in patients operated for inguinal hernia or pelvic organ prolapse with a polypropylene implant. Identifying these predictors may aid surgeons to counsel patients and select appropriate candidates for mesh revision surgery. Methods Clinical records before and after mesh revision surgery from 221 patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and 59 patients with pain after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery were collected at two experienced tertiary referral centers. Primary outcome was patient reported improvement of pain after revision surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to specify predictors for pain reduction. Results The multivariable logistic regression was performed for each patient group separately. Patients with CPIP had higher chances of improvement of pain when time between mesh placement and mesh revision surgery was longer, with an OR of 1.19 per year. A turning point in chances of risks and benefits was demonstrated at 70 months, with improved outcomes for patients with revision surgery ≥ 70 months (OR 2.86). For POP patients, no statistically significant predictors for reduction of pain after (partial) removal surgery could be identified. Conclusion A longer duration of at least 70 months between implantation of inguinal mesh and revision surgery seems to give a higher chance on improvement of pain. Caregivers should not avoid surgery based on a longer duration of symptoms when an association between symptoms and the location of the mesh is found.
TL;DR: In this paper , the diagnostic performance of CT with Valsalva maneuver for the diagnosis and characterization of inguinal hernias was evaluated for each reader and the authors quantified with Krippendorff's α coefficients.
Abstract: Inguinal hernias are mainly diagnosed clinically, but imaging can aid in equivocal cases or for treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT with Valsalva maneuver for the diagnosis and characterization of inguinal hernias.This single-center retrospective study reviewed all consecutive Valsalva-CT studies between 2018 and 2019. A composite clinical reference standard including surgery was used. Three blinded, independent readers (readers 1-3) reviewed the CT images and scored the presence and type of inguinal hernia. A fourth reader measured hernia size. Interreader agreement was quantified with Krippendorff's α coefficients. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Valsalva-CT for the detection of inguinal hernias was computed for each reader.The final study population included 351 patients (99 women) with median age 52.2 years (interquartile range (IQR), 47.2, 68.9). A total of 381 inguinal hernias were present in 221 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 85.8%, 98.1%, and 91.5% for reader 1, 72.7%, 92.5%, and 81.8% for reader 2, and 68.2%, 96.3%, and 81.1% for reader 3. Hernia neck size was significantly larger in cases correctly detected by all three readers (19.0 mm, IQR 13, 25), compared to those missed by all readers (7.0 mm, IQR, 5, 9; p < 0.001). Interreader agreement was substantial (α = 0.723) for the diagnosis of hernia and moderate (α = 0.522) for the type of hernia.Valsalva-CT shows very high specificity and high accuracy for the diagnosis of inguinal hernia. Sensitivity is only moderate which is associated with missed smaller hernias.