International Journal of Intercultural Relations 

TL;DR: The authors examined the cultural and psychological aspects of these phenomena that take place during the process of acculturation, and found that there are large group and individual differences in how people (in both groups in contact) go about their acculture (described in terms of the integration, assimilation, separation and marginalization strategies), in how much stress they experience, and how well they adapt psychologically and socioculturally.

TL;DR: The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) as mentioned in this paper is a 50-item, paper-and-pencil measure of intercultural competence, which was developed to measure the orientations toward cultural differences described in the DMIS, including three ethnocentric orientations, where one's culture is experienced as central to reality (Denial, Defense, Minimization), and three ethnorelative orientations where one is experienced in the context of other cultures (Acceptance, Ad aptation, Integration).

TL;DR: In this article, the authors tried empirically to distinguish psychological and sociocultural forms of adjustment during the process of cross-cultural transitions by using multiple regression analysis to construct predictive models of psychological adjustment.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the differences in expected teacher/student and student/student interaction with reference to the four dimensions of Individualism versus Collectivism, large versus small Power Distance, strong versus weak Uncertainty Avoidance, and Masculinity versus Femininity.