Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 

About: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry is an academic journal published by Quintessence Publishing Company. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Bond strength & Dentin. It has an ISSN identifier of 1461-5185. Over the lifetime, 1202 publications have been published receiving 35256 citations.

The microtensile bond test: a review.

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this review is to describe ail of the various modifications of the microtensile bond test in one paper, so that investigators can select the modification that best suits their needs. Methods: The essence of the microtensile test is the division of resin-bonded teeth into siabs between 0.5 and 1.0 mm thick that are then trimmed in such a manner that tensile force will be concentrated on the bonded interface during testing. Among the many advantages of the technique are that each tooth produces multiple specimens. Further, there is no need for a matrix to limit the bonded surface area, since the area is determined by the dimensions of the trimmed specimens. Results: The various modifications of the microtensile test have been used to measure differences in regional bond strength across occiusal dentin, down the external surface of teeth from crown through roots, down the internal surface of root oanals from cervical to apical thirds, as well as tc ccmpare normal vs caries-affected occiusai dentin and normal vs sclerotic cervical dentin. The technique is ideal for evaiuating the long-term durauiiity of resin-hard-tissue bonds.

Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review.

Abstract: Purpose To summarize research conducted on self-adhesive cements and provide information on their properties, based on the results of original scientific full-length papers from peer-reviewed journals listed in PubMed. Materials and methods The search was conducted using the term "self-adhesive cement OR (trade names of currently available products)". Results Only in vitro studies that investigated two commercially available self-adhesive cements have been published so far. The results were summarized into the following categories: adhesion to tooth substrates (enamel, dentin, root dentin), adhesion to restorative materials (endodontic posts, ceramics, titanium abutments), marginal adaptation, microleakage, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, chemical adhesion and fluoride release, and ratings in clinical use. Conclusion The majority of available literature data is based on studies that investigated one of the self-adhesive cements that are currently available to clinicians. According to the in vitro results, self-adhesive cement adhesion to dentin and various restorative materials is satisfactory and comparable to other multistep resin cements, while adhesion to enamel appears to be a weak link in their bonding properties. Long-term clinical performance of these materials needs to be assessed prior to making a general recommendation for their use.

Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.

Abstract: Purpose This article compiles a survey on the longevity of restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities and assesses possible reasons for failure. Materials and methods The dental literature predominantly of the last decade was reviewed for longitudinal, controlled clinical studies and retrospective cross-sectional studies of posterior restorations. Only studies investigating the clinical performance of restorations in permanent teeth were included. Longevity and annual failure rates of amalgam, direct composite restorations, glass ionomers and derivative products, composite and ceramic inlays, and cast gold restorations were determined for Class I and II cavities. Results Annual failure rates in posterior stress-bearing restorations are: 0% to 7% for amalgam restorations, 0% to 9% for direct composites, 1.4% to 14.4% for glass ionomers and derivatives, 0% to 11.8% for composite inlays, 0% to 7.5% for ceramic restorations, 0% to 4.4% for CAD/CAM ceramic restorations, and 0% to 5.9% for cast gold inlays and onlays. Conclusion Longevity of dental restorations is dependent upon many different factors that are related to materials, the patient, and the dentist. The principal reasons for failure were secondary caries, fracture, marginal deficiencies, wear, and postoperative sensitivity. A distinction must be made between factors causing early failures and those that are responsible for restoration loss after several years of service.

Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic.

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the long-term bond strength of adhesive bonding systems to yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic (YPSZ). Materials and methods Plexiglas tubes filled with resin composite were bonded to industrially manufactured zirconia ceramic disks (96% ZrO2 stabilized by 4% Y2O3). After air abrading the ceramic and ultrasonic cleansing, groups of 16 samples were bonded in an alignment apparatus using 7 different bonding methods. Subgroups of 8 bonded samples were tested for tensile strength following storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C either for 3 days or 2 years. In addition, the 2-year samples were thermocycled 37,500 times. The statistical analyses were conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by multiple pair-wise comparison of the groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results A moderate to relatively high initial bond strength was achieved by air abrasion alone, the additional use of a silane, or acrylizing the YPSZ surface in combination with a conventional bis-GMA resin composite. However, these methods failed spontaneously over storage time. The use of the bis-GMA resin composite after tribochemical silica coating of YPSZ and the use of a polyacid-modified resin composite after air abrasion of YPSZ resulted in a high initial bond strength which decreased significantly over storage time. A durable resin bond strength to YPSZ was achieved only after air abrasion of YPSZ and using one of two resin composites containing a special phosphate monomer. Conclusion A durable bond strength to YPSZ was achieved only by using resin composites containing a special adhesive monomer.

Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: PURPOSE Currently, no consensus exists regarding the best adhesion protocol for zirconia used in dentistry; this is important particularly for restorations where mechanical retention is deficient. This systematic review analyzed the adhesion potential of resin-based and glass-ionomer luting cements to zirconia and aimed to highlight the possible dominant factors affecting the bond strength results to this substrate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Original scientific papers on adhesion to zirconia published in the MEDLINE (PubMed) database between 01/01/1995 and 01/06/2011 were included in this systematic review. The following MeSH terms, search terms, and their combinations were used: "Dental bonding", "Zirconium", "Zirconia", "Y-TZP", "Y-TZP ceramic", "Materials Testing/methods", "Test", "Cement", and "Resin bonding". Two reviewers performed screening and data abstraction. Descriptive statistics were performed and the frequencies of the studied parameters, means, standard deviations, confidence intervals (95% CI; uncorrected and corrected), median values, and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for the bond strength data reported for different factor levels: surface conditioning methods (control, physicochemical, physical, chemical), cements (bis-GMA-, MDP-, and 4-META-based resin cements, self-adhesive cements, glass ionomer), aging with and without thermocycling (TC), and test methods (macroshear, microshear, macrotensile, and microtensile). RESULTS The final search provided 177 titles with abstracts. Further abstract screening yielded 72 articles, out of which 54 were found potentially appropriate to be included. After full text evaluation, 2 of these were eliminated. The selection process resulted in the final sample of 52 studies. In total, 169 different surface conditioning methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters (primers or silanes), were investigated. Altogether, the use of 5 types of cements and 4 testing methods was reported. While 26 studies were performed without TC as aging, 26 of them employed thermocycling at varying number of cycles. This review highlighted that adhesion of the luting cements is significantly influenced by the surface conditioning method (p = 0.044), cement type (p = 0.018), test method (p = 0.017) and aging condition (p = 0.003). In nonconditioned control groups without thermocycling, mean bond strength values ranged between 1.15 (IQR = 3.54) and 8.93 (IQR = 9), and 6.9 (IQR = 0) and 8.73 (IQR = 13.93) MPa for macroshear and macrotensile tests, respectively. After physical conditioning method, MDP monomer based cement presented the highest bond values compared to those of other resin cements using either the macrotensile (no TC: 34.2; IQR = 24.18 MPa, TC: 42.35; IQR = 0 MPa) or microtensile (no TC: 37.2; IQR = 41.5 MPa, TC: 17.1; IQR = 31.15 MPa) test method. CONCLUSION Based on the results of this systematic review, increased adhesion could be expected after physicochemical conditioning of zirconia. MDP-based resin cements tend to present higher results than those of other cements types when tested using macro- and microtensile tests. Adhesion studies on zirconia and reporting of data require more standardization.