scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 1067-151X

Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
About: Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is an academic journal published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Medicine & Arthroplasty. It has an ISSN identifier of 1067-151X. Over the lifetime, 3282 publications have been published receiving 133813 citations. The journal is also known as: JAAOS on CD-ROM & JAAOS.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The risk factors for noncontact ACL injuries fall into four distinct categories: environmental, anatomic, hormonal, and biomechanical as discussed by the authors, and early data on existing neuromuscular training programs suggest that enhancing body control may decrease ACL injuries in women.
Abstract: An estimated 80,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears occur annually in the United States. The highest incidence is in individuals 15 to 25 years old who participate in pivoting sports. With an estimated cost for these injuries of almost a billion dollars per year, the ability to identify risk factors and develop prevention strategies has widespread health and fiscal importance. Seventy percent of ACL injuries occur in noncontact situations. The risk factors for non-contact ACL injuries fall into four distinct categories: environmental, anatomic, hormonal, and biomechanical. Early data on existing neuromuscular training programs suggest that enhancing body control may decrease ACL injuries in women. Further investigation is needed prior to instituting prevention programs related to the other risk factors.

1,180 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Bone graft incorporation within the host, whether autogenous or allogeneic, depends on many factors: type of graft, site of transplant, quality of transplanted bone and host bone, host bed preparation, preservation techniques, systemic and local disease, and mechanical properties of the graft.
Abstract: Many approaches are used to repair skeletal defects in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, and bone grafting is involved in virtually every procedure. The type of bone graft used depends on the clinical scenario and the anticipated final outcome. Autogenous cancellous bone graft, with its osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties, remains the standard for grafting. However, the high incidence of morbidity during autogenous graft harvest may make the acquisition of grafts from other sources desirable. The clinical applications for each type of bone graft are dictated by the structure and biochemical properties of the graft. An elegant cellular and molecular cascade follows bone transplantation. Bone graft incorporation within the host, whether autogenous or allogeneic, depends on many factors: type of graft (autogenous versus allogeneic, vascular versus nonvascular), site of transplant, quality of transplanted bone and host bone, host bed preparation, preservation techniques, systemic and local disease, and mechanical properties of the graft.

675 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Grafting substitutes currently available include cancellous and cortical allograft bone, ceramics, demineralized bone matrix, bone marrow, and composite grafts, all of which provide all three components for bone regeneration.
Abstract: Bone grafting is frequently used to augment bone healing with the numerous approaches to reconstructing or replacing skeletal defects. Autologous cancellous bone graft remains the most effective grafting material because it provides the three elements required for bone regeneration: osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenic cells. Autologous cortical bone graft provides these three components to a limited extent as well and also provides the structural integrity important in reconstruction of larger defects. However, because autogenous grafting is associated with several shortcomings and complications, including limited quantities of bone for harvest and donor-site morbidity, alternatives have been used in a wide range of orthopaedic pathologic conditions. Grafting substitutes currently available include cancellous and cortical allograft bone, ceramics, demineralized bone matrix, bone marrow, and composite grafts. No single alternative graft material provides all three components for bone regeneration. The clinical applications for each type of material are dictated by its particular structural and biochemical properties. Composite grafts consisting of several materials are often used to maximize bone healing, especially where the grafting site is compromised.

594 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results of nerve repair to date have been no better than fair, with only 50% of patients regaining useful function, and there is much ongoing research regarding pharmacologic agents, immune system modulators, enhancing factors, and entubulation chambers.
Abstract: Peripheral nerve injuries are common, and there is no easily available formula for successful treatment. Incomplete injuries are most frequent. Seddon classified nerve injuries into three categories: neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis. After complete axonal transection, the neuron undergoes a number of degenerative processes, followed by attempts at regeneration. A distal growth cone seeks out connections with the degenerated distal fiber. The current surgical standard is epineurial repair with nylon suture. To span gaps that primary repair cannot bridge without excessive tension, nerve-cable interfascicular auto-grafts are employed. Unfortunately, results of nerve repair to date have been no better than fair, with only 50% of patients regaining useful function. There is much ongoing research regarding pharmacologic agents, immune system modulators, enhancing factors, and entubulation chambers. Clinically applicable developments from these investigations will continue to improve the results of treatment of nerve injuries.

581 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Current evidence suggests that decreased core stability may predispose to injury and that appropriate training may reduce injury, and can be tested using isometric, isokinetic, and isoinertial methods.
Abstract: Core stability may provide several benefits to the musculoskeletal system, from maintaining low back health to preventing knee ligament injury. As a result, the acquisition and maintenance of core stability is of great interest to physical therapists, athletic trainers, and musculoskeletal researchers. Core stability is the ability of the lumbopelvic hip complex to prevent buckling and to return to equilibrium after perturbation. Although static elements (bone and soft tissue) contribute to some degree, core stability is predominantly maintained by the dynamic function of muscular elements. There is a clear relationship between trunk muscle activity and lower extremity movement. Current evidence suggests that decreased core stability may predispose to injury and that appropriate training may reduce injury. Core stability can be tested using isometric, isokinetic, and isoinertial methods. Appropriate intervention may result in decreased rates of back and lower extremity injury.

575 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
2023175
2022268
2021323
2020283
2019250
2018184