scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0162-895X

Political Psychology 

Wiley-Blackwell
About: Political Psychology is an academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Politics & Poison control. It has an ISSN identifier of 0162-895X. Over the lifetime, 2111 publications have been published receiving 106629 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper reviewed and integrated 10 years of research on 20 hypotheses derived from a system justification perspective, focusing on the phenomenon of implicit outgroup favoritism among members of disadvantaged groups (including African Americans, the elderly, and gays/lesbians) and its relation to political ideology.
Abstract: Most theories in social and political psychology stress self-interest, intergroup conflict, ethnocentrism, homophily, ingroup bias, outgroup antipathy, dominance, and resistance. System justification theory is influenced by these perspectives—including social identity and social dominance theories—but it departs from them in several respects. Advocates of system justification theory argue that (a) there is a general ideological motive to justify the existing social order, (b) this motive is at least partially responsible for the internalization of inferiority among members of disadvantaged groups, (c) it is observed most readily at an implicit, nonconscious level of awareness and (d) paradoxically, it is sometimes strongest among those who are most harmed by the status quo. This article reviews and integrates 10 years of research on 20 hypotheses derived from a system justification perspective, focusing on the phenomenon of implicit outgroup favoritism among members of disadvantaged groups (including African Americans, the elderly, and gays/lesbians) and its relation to political ideology (especially liberalism-conservatism).

2,236 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Popkin this article analyzes three primary campaigns Carter in 1976, Bush and Reagan in 1980, and Hart, Mondale and Jackson in 1984 to arrive at a new model of the way voters sort through commercials and sound bites to choose a candidate.
Abstract: \"The Reasoning Voter\" is an insider's look at campaigns, candidates, media, and voters that convincingly argues that voters make informed logical choices. Samuel L. Popkin analyzes three primary campaigns Carter in 1976; Bush and Reagan in 1980; and Hart, Mondale, and Jackson in 1984 to arrive at a new model of the way voters sort through commercials and sound bites to choose a candidate. Drawing on insights from economics and cognitive psychology, he convincingly demonstrates that, as trivial as campaigns often appear, they provide voters with a surprising amount of information on a candidate's views and skills. For all their shortcomings, campaigns \"do\" matter. \"If you're preparing to run a presidential campaign, and only have time to read one book, make sure to read Sam Popkin's \"The Reasoning Voter.\" If you have time to read two books, read \"The Reasoning Voter\" twice.\" James Carville, Senior Stategist, Clinton/Gore '92 \"A fresh and subtle analysis of voter behavior.\" Thomas Byrne Edsall, \"New York Review of Books\"\"Professor Popkin has brought V.O. Key's contention that voters are rational into the media age. This book is a useful rebuttal to the cynical view that politics is a wholly contrived business, in which unscrupulous operatives manipulate the emotions of distrustful but gullible citizens. The reality, he shows, is both more complex and more hopeful than that.\" David S. Broder, \"The Washington Post\"\

1,826 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, Murray Edelman argues against the conventional interpretation of politics, one that takes for granted that we live in a world of facts and that people react rationally to the facts they know, and explores the ways in which the conspicuous aspects of the political scene are interpretations that systematically buttress established inequalities and interpretations already dominant political ideologies.
Abstract: Thanks to the ready availability of political news today, informed citizens can protect and promote their own interests and the public interest more effectively. Or can they? Murray Edelman argues against this conventional interpretation of politics, one that takes for granted that we live in a world of facts and that people react rationally to the facts they know. In doing so, he explores in detail the ways in which the conspicuous aspects of the political scene are interpretations that systematically buttress established inequalities and interpretations already dominant political ideologies.

1,225 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The multidimensionality of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes and their relationship to nuclear policy opinions was investigated by as discussed by the authors, who concluded that researchers need to be more attentive to this multidimensionalality, especially the distinction between patriotism and nationalism.
Abstract: The multidimensionality of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes and their relationship to nuclear policy opinions were investigated One hundred and ninety-four college students, 24 high school students, and 21 building contractors were administered the 120-item Patriotism/Nationalism Questionnaire One hundred and sixty-six of the college students were concurrently administered the 18-item Nuclear Policy Questionnaire An iterated principal factor analysis was performed on the Patriotism/Nationalism Questionnaire and six factors were extracted for Varimax rotation The results indicated that the factors were interpretable and distinct Further analyses indicated the predictive validity of the subscales derived from the six factors for the Nuclear Policy Questionnaire, and exploratory analyses of variance examined the effects of selected demographic variables The findings support the contention that patriotic/nationalistic attitudes entail multiple dimensions, and that they are differentially related to nuclear policy opinions We conclude that researchers need to be more attentive to this multidimensionality, especially the distinction between patriotism and nationalism

961 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, four key issues that hinder the successful application of social identity theory to political phenomena are the existence of identity choice, the subjective meaning of identities, gradations in identity strength, and the considerable stability of many social and political identities.
Abstract: Interest in the concept of identity has grown exponentially within both the humanities and social sciences, but the discussion of identity has had less impact than might be expected on the quantitative study of political behavior in general and on political psychology more specifically. One of the approaches that holds the most promise for political psychologists is social identity theory, as reflected in the thinking of Henri Tajfel, John Turner, and colleagues. Although the theory addresses the kinds of problems of interest to political psychologists, it has had limited impact on political psychology because of social identity theorists' disinclination to examine the sources of social identity in a real world complicated by history and culture. In this review, four key issues are examined that hinder the successful application of social identity theory to political phenomena. These key issues are the existence of identity choice, the subjective meaning of identities, gradations in identity strength, and the considerable stability of many social and political identities.

926 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202332
202278
202199
202066
201985
201893