scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 2159-2896

The International journal of sports physical therapy 

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
About: The International journal of sports physical therapy is an academic journal published by International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Medicine & Population. It has an ISSN identifier of 2159-2896. It is also open access. Over the lifetime, 1283 publications have been published receiving 20708 citations. The journal is also known as: IJSPT.


Papers
More filters
Journal Article
TL;DR: The intent of this two part series is to present the concepts associated with screening of fundamental movements, whether it is the FMS™ system or a different system devised by another clinician.
Abstract: Part 1 of this two‐part series (presented in the June issue of IJSPT) provided an introduction to functional movement screening, as well as the history, background, and a summary of the evidence regarding the reliability of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™). Part 1 presented three of the seven fundamental movement patterns that comprise the FMS™, and the specific ordinal grading system from 0‐3, used in the their scoring. Specifics for scoring each test are presented. Part 2 of this series provides a review of the concepts associated with the analysis of fundamental movement as a screening system for functional movement competency. In addition, the four remaining movements of the FMS™, which complement those described in Part 1, will be presented (to complete the total of seven fundamental movements): Shoulder Mobility, the Active Straight Leg Raise, the Trunk Stability Push‐up, and Rotary Stability. The final four patterns are described in detail, and the specifics for scoring each test are presented, as well as the proposed clinical implications for receiving a grade less than a perfect “3”. The intent of this two part series is to present the concepts associated with screening of fundamental movements, whether it is the FMS™ system or a different system devised by another clinician. Such a fundamental screen of the movement system should be incorporated into pre‐participation screening and return to sport testing in order to determine whether an athlete has the essential movements needed to participate in sports activities at a level of minimum competency. Part 2 concludes with a discussion of the evidence related to functional movement screening, myths related to the FMS™, the future of functional movement screening, and the concept of movement as a system. Level of Evidence: 5

354 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: Understanding the different aspects of statistical analysis and determinations of clinical relevance in the literature, including validity, significance, effect, and confidence will help practitioners better utilize the evidence to improve their clinical decision-making skills.
Abstract: UNLABELLED Evidence-based practice requires clinicians to stay current with the scientific literature. Unfortunately, rehabilitation professionals are often faced with research literature that is difficult to interpret clinically. Clinical research data is often analyzed with traditional statistical probability (p-values), which may not give rehabilitation professionals enough information to make clinical decisions. Statistically significant differences or outcomes simply address whether to accept or reject a null or directional hypothesis, without providing information on the magnitude or direction of the difference (treatment effect). To improve the interpretation of clinical significance in the rehabilitation literature, researchers commonly include more clinically-relevant information such as confidence intervals and effect sizes. It is important for clinicians to be able to interpret confidence intervals using effect sizes, minimal clinically important differences, and magnitude-based inferences. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the different aspects of statistical analysis and determinations of clinical relevance in the literature, including validity, significance, effect, and confidence. Understanding these aspects of research will help practitioners better utilize the evidence to improve their clinical decision-making skills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5.

269 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The results indicate that reliable measures of weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion ROM can be obtained from a novice rater and all three techniques had good reliability and low measurement error.
Abstract: Purpose/Background: A variety of methods exist to measure ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM). Few studies have examined the reliability of a novice rater. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of ankle ROM measurements using three different techniques in a novice rater.

261 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The purpose of this clinical commentary is to discuss the current concepts of muscle stretching interventions and summarize the evidence related to stretching as used in both exercise and rehabilitation.
Abstract: Stretching is a common activity used by athletes, older adults, rehabilitation patients, and anyone participating in a fitness program. While the benefits of stretching are known, controversy remains about the best type of stretching for a particular goal or outcome. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to discuss the current concepts of muscle stretching interventions and summarize the evidence related to stretching as used in both exercise and rehabilitation.

221 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: The results cautiously support the interchangeable use of goniometry and digital inclinometer for measuring shoulder mobility measurements and clinicians should consider the 95% limits of agreement when using these instruments interchangeably as clinically significant differences are likely to be present.
Abstract: Purpose/Aim: This study investigated the intrarater reliability and concurrent validity of active shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer.

219 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202375
2022146
2021160
2020111
201989
2018102