scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism in 1977"




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Andrew as mentioned in this paper provides explanations of theories which involve perceptual psychology and structuralism; semiotics and psychoanalysis; hermeneutics and genre study, and his own strong views on the relationship of film theory to criticism, history, and analysis.
Abstract: Dudley Andrew is a master at making the world of film theory accessible to a largely mystified public. Since the publication of his Major Film Theories, a classic in the field, the sophistication of the debate concerning the proper approach to film has grown. It is now the province of critics and universities instead of directors and artists, and this book concentrates on the main areas of the debate rather than on the individual figures. Andrew provides lucid explanations of theories which involve perceptual psychology and structuralism; semiotics and psychoanalysis; hermeneutics and genre study. Throughout he presents his own strong views on the relationship of film theory to criticism, history, and analysis. His clear approach to often obscure theories goes a long way towards bringing an important area of cultural discussion out of its academic exile.

87 citations



























Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: The authenticity of the Hippias Major dialogues has been extensively discussed in the last few decades as discussed by the authors, and it has suffered from a neglect that far surpasses that of the other minor but undeniably genuine dialogues.
Abstract: The authenticity of the Hippias Major is disputed. Neither clearly genuine nor clearly spurious, hidden under a cloud of doubt, it has suffered from a neglect that far surpasses that of the other minor but undeniably genuine dialogues. My aim here is not to go into the many arguments for and against authenticity,1 but to show, within a modest scope, how the Hippias Major makes sense as an early expression of Plato’s views on aesthetic principles.2 This piece, therefore, may be considered, at least by those sympathetic to it, an indirect argument for its genuineness.