Journal•ISSN: 0009-1774
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
University of Massachusetts Press
About: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy is an academic journal published by University of Massachusetts Press. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Pragmatism & Semiotics. It has an ISSN identifier of 0009-1774. Over the lifetime, 417 publications have been published receiving 1995 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
•
01 Jan 2015-Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
TL;DR: In this paper, a careful reading of Peirce's early work provides a precursor to the modern notion of inference to the best explanation, a mode of inference used to decide which of competing explanations of a phenomenon to regard as true.
Abstract: One of C. S. Peirce’s most misunderstood ideas is his notion of abduction, the process of generating and selecting hypotheses to test. Contemporary philosophers of science have falsely cited Peirce’s idea of abduction as a conceptual precursor to the modern notion of inference to the best explanation, a mode of inference used to decide which of competing explanations of a phenomenon to regard as true. Here, I examine how the misunderstanding originated by exploring influential discussions of inference to the best explanation in the works of Gilbert Harman, Bas van Fraassen, Paul Thagard, and Peter Lipton. While all these authors either failed to cite, or incorrectly cited, Peirce, I show that Thagard has noted a sense in which Peirce’s early work provides a precursor to the modern notion of inference to the best explanation. However, a careful reading of Peirce shows that “abduction” has never been a proper synonym for “inference to the best explanation.” So Peirce is not to blame for the misunderstanding. I conclude by defending the philosophic importance of abduction and demonstrating how applying Peirce’s criteria for good abduction to debates in evolutionary theory can move the field forward.
48 citations
••
01 Oct 2006-Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
47 citations
••
12 Jul 2006-Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss if and in what sense semiosis can be regarded as an "emergent" process in semiotic systems and pose fundamental questions that have to be answered in order to ascribe a precise meaning to the term "emergence" in the context of an understanding of semiosis.
Abstract: In this paper, we intend to discuss if and in what sense semiosis (meaning process, cf. C. S. Peirce) can be regarded as an "emergent" process in semiotic systems. It is not our problem here to answer when or how semiosis emerged in nature. As a prerequisite for the very formulation of these problems, we are rather interested in discussing the conditions which should be fulfilled for semiosis to be characterized as an emergent process. The first step in this work is to summarize a systematic analysis of the variety of emergence theories and concepts, elaborated by Achim Stephan. Along the summary of this analysis, we pose fundamental questions that have to be answered in order to ascribe a precise meaning to the term "emergence" in the context of an understanding of semiosis. After discussing a model for explaining emergence based on Salthe's hierarchical structuralism, which considers three levels at a time in a semiotic system, we present some tentative answers to those questions.
47 citations
•
01 Jan 2010-Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
TL;DR: In this article, Schurz's (2008) distinction of eleven "patterns of abduction" that he organizes in four groups is extended to 15 forms in an alternative structure.
Abstract: Based on a definition of "abductive insight" and a critical discussion of G. Schurz's (2008) distinction of eleven "patterns of abduction" that he organizes in four groups, I suggest an even more comprehensive classification that distinguishes 15 forms in an alternative structure. These forms are organized, on the one hand, with regard to what is abductively inferred—singular facts, types, laws, theoretical models, or representation systems—and, on the other, with regard to the question whether the abductive procedure is selective or creative (including a distinction between "psychologically creative," as in school learning, or "historically creative"). Moreover, I argue that theoretical-model abduction—which seems to be the most important form of abduction—depends on two preconditions: first on the availability of an adequate system of representation, and second on finding a new "perspective" on a given problem, as Peirce described it with the notion of a "theoric transformation." To understand the significance of theoric transformations—especially in mathematics—it is necessary to analyze in some detail Peirce's main example for a theoric transformation: the proof of Desargues's theorem.
36 citations
•
01 Jan 2008-Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy
TL;DR: In this article, a careful examination of Peirce's original manuscripts shows that there are five main periods in Pece's evolution in his mathematical and philosophical conceptualizations of continuity.
Abstract: This article aims to demonstrate that a careful examination of Peirce's original manuscripts shows that there are five main periods in Peirce's evolution in his mathematical and philosophical conceptualizations of continuity. The aim of this article is also to establish the relevance of Peirce's reflections on continuity for philosophers and mathematicians. 1
35 citations