scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0195-7732

Women & Politics 

Routledge
About: Women & Politics is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Politics & Feminism. It has an ISSN identifier of 0195-7732. Over the lifetime, 462 publications have been published receiving 7076 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper investigated similarities and differences in the relationship between "public" and "private" in the lives of women and men who hold elective and appointive office and found that men's political choices are more influenced by private sphere considerations than commonly believed, but that private sphere concerns are nevertheless of greater significance to women than to men.
Abstract: This article investigates similarities and differences in the relationship between "public" and "private" in the lives of women and men who hold elective and appointive office. An analysis of data collected through surveys of federal appointees and state legislators indicates that men's political choices may be more influenced by private sphere considerations than commonly believed, but that private sphere concerns are nevertheless of greater significance to women than to men. Findings provide support for a conceptualization of public and private as an interrelated system of social relations rather than as two largely separate spheres of existence.

459 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a four state survey of party county chairs and locally elected women to find support for the notion that potential women candidates are subject to bias in recruitment that hinders the cause of electing more women to state legislatures and Congress.
Abstract: Using a four state survey of party county chairs and locally elected women, this study finds support for the notion that potential women candidates are subject to bias in recruitment that hinders the cause of electing more women to state legislatures and Congress. It is hypothesized that bias is most likely due to one of two processes: one, the outgroup effect where negative evaluations of women as candidates are predicated on their lack of surface similarity to the predominantly male party elite, or two, the distribution effect where negative evaluations of women as candidates are predicated on the relative paucity of women in high status positions generally and politics specifically. Strong support was found for the outgroup effect, as party chairs consistently preferred candidates more like themselves. Given the ubiquity of men in the party elite, such outgroup biased attitudes represent a significant hurdle for prospective women candidates.

209 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper examined gender differences in the anticipation of political participation among American fourteen-year-olds, building on the 1999 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement study (n = 2,811).
Abstract: Participation research routinely reveals a gender gap with regard to most forms of political engagement. In the recent literature, differences in the availability of resources and civic skills are usually invoked as an explanation for this pattern. This theory focuses primarily on adult behavior and has not as yet been investigated among young people, for whom we can assume that resources are distributed more equally. In this article, we examine gender differences in the anticipation of political participation among American fourteen-year-olds, building on the 1999 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement study (n = 2,811). First, the results show that girls at this age mention even more actions they intend to engage in than do boys, so clearly the gender gap with regard to the level of participation has not yet emerged at that age. Second, we observe distinct patterns with regard to the kinds of actions favored, with girls being drawn more towards social movement-r...

184 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed gender differences in the Honduran Congress from the 1990-93 and 1994-97 terms and found that women do not have a higher priority than men on children's and family issues.
Abstract: This paper proposes that findings in existing literature concerning the policy priorities of women legislators in Nordic countries, the United States, and Argentina may also be generalized to less developed countries where support for women in politics is minimal. Past studies in countries where women have achieved comparatively high levels of representation report that women legislators show a higher legislative priority on issues concerning women's rights and children and families. Using data on bill initiation, this paper analyzes gender differences in the Honduran Congress from the 1990-93 and 1994-97 terms. Findings are similar to previous studies in that women appear to place a higher priority on women's rights issues; however, we find that women do not have a higher priority than men on children's and family issues. Examination of bill debate shows that women are more frequent participants in debates of bills involving women's rights and children's and family issues than of bills concernin...

153 citations

Network Information
Related Journals (5)
The Journal of Politics
5.5K papers, 230.8K citations
79% related
American Political Science Review
10.5K papers, 577.7K citations
76% related
American Journal of Political Science
2.7K papers, 335K citations
76% related
Comparative Political Studies
2.2K papers, 129.6K citations
74% related
Public Administration Review
5.8K papers, 254.9K citations
74% related
Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
20102
200867
200414
200323
200214
200135