Journal ArticleDOI
A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions
TLDR
In this paper, a credibility measurement of distance function and a broader concept of the axiom of choice in order to reconcile disagreement among compromise solutions is introduced, and the credibility measurement is used to reconcile disagreements among compromise solution.Abstract:
The application of compromise solutions to discrete multi-objective problems brings about some technical flexibilities, such as the selection of distance function for computing both normalized attribute ratings and distances between two alternatives, and the choice between the ideal and negative-ideal alternatives for implementing the axiom of choice These flexibilities are undesirable, since the method may yield conflicting preference-alternative rankings, depending on parameter choice This paper introduces a credibility measurement of distance function and takes a broader concept of the axiom of choice in order to reconcile disagreement among compromise solutionsread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
TL;DR: A comparative analysis of the multiple criteria decision making methods VIKOR and TOPSIS is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences.
Journal ArticleDOI
Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
TL;DR: In this article, a new method, called best-worst method (BWM) is proposed to solve multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, in which a number of alternatives are evaluated with respect to different criteria in order to select the best alternative(s).
Journal ArticleDOI
Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
TL;DR: The VIKOR method as mentioned in this paper was developed to solve MCDM problems with conflicting and noncommensurable (different units) criteria, assuming that compromising is acceptable for conflict resolution, the decision maker wants a solution that is the closest to the ideal, and the alternatives are evaluated according to all established criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI
TOPSIS for MODM
TL;DR: In this article, the authors extend TOPSIS to solve a multiple objective decision making problem, and obtain a single-objective programming problem by using the max-min operator for the second-order compromise operation.
Journal ArticleDOI
A new approach for multiple objective decision making
TL;DR: The proposed TOPSIS for MODM algorithm is developed for solving multiple objective decision-making problems by considering two reference points of the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution simultaneously, and a numerical nutrition problem is solved.
References
More filters
Posted Content
Decisions with Multiple Objectives
Ralph L. Keeney,Howard Raiffa +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a confused decision maker, who wishes to make a reasonable and responsible choice among alternatives, can systematically probe his true feelings in order to make those critically important, vexing trade-offs between incommensurable objectives.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems
TL;DR: Given a set of utility functions defined on a decision space for a group of individuals, the concept of utopia point for the group as well as the group regret of a feasible decision is introduced.
Journal ArticleDOI
How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking
TL;DR: Data is presented illustrating the application of multiattribute utility measurement to two specific instances: management of the coastal zone of the town of Venice, a part of Los Angeles, CA; and selection of research programs for the Office of Child Development, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.