scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?

Ulrich Schmoch, +1 more
- 01 Mar 2008 - 
- Vol. 74, Iss: 3, pp 361-377
TLDR
This article compares, within a data-set of German research units, citation and co-publication indicators as a proxy for the unobserved quality dimension of scientific research and suggests that, although there is a strong partial correlation between citations andCo-publications within a multivariate setting, it cannot use reasonably normalised co- publications indicators as an alternative proxy for quality.
Abstract
This article deals with the role of internationally co-authored papers (co-publications). Specifically, we compare, within a data-set of German research units, citation and co-publication indicators as a proxy for the unobserved quality dimension of scientific research. In that course we will also deal with the question whether both citations and co-publications are considerably related. Our results suggest that, although there is a strong partial correlation between citations and co-publications within a multivariate setting, we cannot use reasonably normalised co-publication indicators as an alternative proxy for quality. Thus, concerning quality assessment, there remains a primer on citation analysis.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Collaborations: The fourth age of research

TL;DR: Jonathan Adams analyses papers from the past three decades and finds that the best science comes from international collaboration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries

TL;DR: Mapping scientific cooperation at the country level reveals that Western countries situated at the core of the map are extensively cooperating with each other and high-impact institutions are significantly more collaborative than others.
Journal ArticleDOI

Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university

TL;DR: A longitudinal dataset of 65 biomedical scientists at a New Zealand university and coded collaboration variables by hand checking each of their publications in a period of 14 years found that at article level, both within-university collaboration and international collaboration are positively related to an article's quality and that, at scientist-year level, only international collaboration is positive related to a scientist's future research output.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review

TL;DR: This study examines how the peer-reviewed safety science literature formulates the rationale behind the study of resilience, constructs resilience as a scientific object, and constructs and locates the resilient subject.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: a case study of Harvard University's publications

TL;DR: There was a significant positive correlation between the number of authors and the numberof citations in Harvard publications, whereas publications with more number of foreign collaborators were not much highly cited.
References
More filters
Book

Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data

TL;DR: This is the essential companion to Jeffrey Wooldridge's widely-used graduate text Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, 2001).
Journal ArticleDOI

What is research collaboration

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors distinguish between collaboration at different levels and show that inter-institutional and international collaboration need not necessarily involve inter-individual collaboration, and argue for a more symmetrical approach in comparing the costs of collaboration with the undoubted benefits when considering policies towards research collaboration.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity

TL;DR: Based on the curricula vitae and survey responses of 443 academic scientists affiliated with university research centers in the USA, the authors examined the longstanding assumption that research collaborati cation is collaborative.
Book

Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation

Henk F. Moed
TL;DR: This work focuses on assessing Basic Science Research Departments and Scientific Journals, as well as Empirical and Theoretical Chapters, and the Citation Indexes, which summarize the literature on empirical and theoretical determinants of scientific research.
Related Papers (5)