scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Argumentation schemes and enthymemes

Douglas Walton, +1 more
- 01 Jul 2005 - 
- Vol. 145, Iss: 3, pp 339-370
TLDR
Studying selected cases of incomplete arguments in natural language discourse to see what the requirements are for filling in the unstated premises and conclusions in some systematic and useful way shows this approach to work reasonably well for weak arguments.
Abstract
The aim of this investigation is to explore the role of argumentation schemes in enthymeme reconstruction. This aim is pursued by studying selected cases of incomplete arguments in natural language discourse to see what the requirements are for filling in the unstated premises and conclusions in some systematic and useful way. Some of these cases are best handled using deductive tools, while others respond best to an analysis based on defeasible argumentations schemes. The approach is also shown to work reasonably well for weak arguments, a class of arguments that has always been difficult to analyze without the principle of charity producing a straw man.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation

TL;DR: Araucaria aims to be of use not only in pedagogical situations, but also in support of research activity, and has been designed from the outset to handle more advanced argumentation theoretic concepts such as schemes, which capture stereotypical patterns of reasoning.
Book

Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an argumentation as reasoned dialogue with questions and answers in dialogue and arguments to emotion, bias, and fallacies, and personal attack in argumentation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication

TL;DR: The formal, representational and implementational details are presented here, along with results that demonstrate not only advantages of flexibility, scope, and knowledge sharing, but also of computational efficiency.
Proceedings Article

The Carneades Argumentation FrameworkUsing Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions

TL;DR: A formal, mathematical model of argument structure and evaluation, called the Carneades Argumentation Framework, is presented, which applies proof standards to determine the defensibility of arguments and the acceptability of statements on an issue-by-issue basis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A logic for default reasoning

TL;DR: This paper proposes a logic for default reasoning, develops a complete proof theory and shows how to interface it with a top down resolution theorem prover, and provides criteria under which the revision of derived beliefs must be effected.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rhetorical Structure Theory : Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization

TL;DR: Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) as mentioned in this paper is a descriptive theory of a major aspect of the organization of natural text, which is a linguistically useful method for describing natural texts, characterizing their Structure primarily in terms of relations that hold between parts of the text.
Journal ArticleDOI

CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure

TL;DR: The fundamental assumptions of doing such a large-scale project are examined, the technical lessons learned by the developers are reviewed, and the range of applications that are or soon will be enabled by the technology is surveyed.
Book

The development of logic

TL;DR: The primary purpose of this book has not been to recount all that past scholars have said about the science, but rather to record the first appearances of those ideas which seem most important in the logic of our own day as discussed by the authors.
Book

Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning

TL;DR: The Argumentation Schemes of as mentioned in this paper are: Argumentation from Ignorance. Argument from Consequences. Presumptive Reasoning. Ignoring Qualifications and ignoring Qualifications.