Open AccessJournal Article
Categoricalism and Balancing in First and Second Amendment Analysis
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The least discussed element of District of Columbia v. Heller might ultimately be the most important: the battle between the majority and dissent over the use of categoricalism and balancing in the construction of constitutional doctrine as discussed by the authors.Abstract:
The least discussed element of District of Columbia v. Heller might ultimately be the most important: the battle between the majority and dissent over the use of categoricalism and balancing in the construction of constitutional doctrine. In Heller, Justice Scalia’s categoricalism essentially prevailed over Justice Breyer’s balancing approach. But as the opinion itself demonstrates, Second Amendment categoricalism raises extremely difficult and still-unanswered questions about how to draw and justify the lines between protected and unprotected “Arms,” people, and arms-bearing purposes. At least until balancing tests appear in Second Amendment doctrine—as they almost inevitably will—the future of the Amendment will depend almost entirely on the placement and clarity of these categories. And unless the Court better identifies the core values of the Second Amendment, it will be difficult to give the categories any principled justification.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Freedom of Expression, Sliding-Scales, and Fake News
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the recent European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case-law, with particular attention to fake news and freedom of expression on the web, and show how the Court, on the one hand, endorses a broad reading of the notion of expression and relies on balancing as a method for introducing a limited number of exceptions outside the core of this human right.
Journal ArticleDOI
Constitutional Implications of Firearm Restrictions for Veterans with Fiduciaries.
Journal ArticleDOI
Protesting with guns and conflating the First and Second Amendments: The case of the Bundys
Amy Pason,Patrick C. File +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the legal discourse surrounding two armed anti-government confrontations, at Bunkerville, Nevada, in 2014 and the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon in 2016, is analyzed.
Journal Article
New Approaches to Old Questions in Gun Scholarship
TL;DR: The Second Amendment has been the focus of a great deal of attention in recent years as mentioned in this paper, as a committed group of scholars, lawyers, and activists worked tirelessly to articulate, justify, and popularize the view that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms disconnected from militia service.
References
More filters
Posted Content
Balancing Your Strengths Against Your Felonies: Considerations for Military Recruitment of Ex-Offenders
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed to shift the conversation from ex-offenders' usefulness to the Armed Forces to the reciprocal responsibilities and benefits involved for these potential recruits, the military, and society at large, and concluded that a recruitment strategy currently pursued though winks and nods should be approached more forthrightly and perhaps more vigorously for the good of both civil society and the Armed forces.
Posted Content
The Natural Right of Self-Defense: Heller's Lesson for the World
TL;DR: The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller constitutionalized the right of self-defense, and described selfdefense as a natural, inherent right.
Journal Article