scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Citizen, Mother, Worker: Debating Public Responsibility for Child Care after the Second World War

TLDR
Stoltzfus as discussed by the authors traces grassroots activism and national and local policy debates concerning public funding of children's day care in the two decades after the end of World War II.
Abstract
During World War II, American women entered the workforce in unprecedented numbers, and many of them relied on federally funded child care programs. At the end of the war, working mothers vigorously protested the termination of child care subsidies. In Citizen, Mother, Worker , Emilie Stoltzfus traces grassroots activism and national and local policy debates concerning public funding of children's day care in the two decades after the end of World War II. Using events in Cleveland, Ohio; Washington, D.C.; and the state of California, Stoltzfus identifies a prevailing belief among postwar policymakers that women could best serve the nation as homemakers. Although federal funding was briefly extended after the end of the war, grassroots campaigns for subsidized day care in Cleveland and Washington met with only limited success. In California, however, mothers asserted their importance to the state's economy as "productive citizens" and won a permanent, state-funded child care program. In addition, by the 1960s, federal child care funding gained new life as an alternative to cash aid for poor single mothers. These debates about the public's stake in what many viewed as a private matter help illuminate America's changing social, political, and fiscal priorities, as well as the meaning of female citizenship in the postwar period. |Stoltzfus traces grassroots activism and national and local policy debates surrounding public funding of childcare services for working parents in the two decades after the end of World War II. Using case studies from Cleveland, Washington, D.C., and the state of California, she explains why we still don't have adequate child care in America. The book helps illuminate America's changing social, political, and fiscal priorities, as well as the meaning of female citizenship in the postwar period.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Is It Time to Jump Ship? Historians Rethink the Waves Metaphor

TL;DR: This article revisited the wave metaphor to delineate feminist activism in the United States, highlighting the efficacy of feminist waves as we know them, but also challenging this model for eliding the experiences of women of color, men, young people, and others whose activist work falls under a capacious definition of feminism.
Book

The U.S. Women's Jury Movements and Strategic Adaptation: A More Just Verdict

TL;DR: In this paper, the women's jury movements and strategic adaptation are analyzed in the context of US women's rights and women's citizenship, and qualitative comparative analysis of the movements is performed.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the Importance of Naming: Gender, Race, and the Writing of Policy History

TL;DR: The policy turn of women's history as mentioned in this paper shifted attention from Carroll Smith Rosenberg's "Female World of Love and Ritual" without losing the selfactivity and focus on female difference that investigations of women on their own terms had supplied, and answered the "Politics and Culture" debate of 1980, which revolved around the efficacy of domesticity as an arena for power with a resounding move toward the public, political realm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Protecting soldiers and mothers twenty-five years later: theda skocpol's legacy and american welfare state historiography, 1992–2017

TL;DR: The authors examines Theda Skocpol's landmark 1992 book, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, and discusses its influence historians of the U.S. welfare state in the past twenty-five years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Working after Childbirth: A Lifecourse Transition Analysis of Canadian Women from the 1970s to the 2000s

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare cohorts of mothers who had their first children between 1970 and 1999, in terms of their probability of beginning work shortly after childbearing, and show that mothers with low educational attainment are dramatically excluded from the labor market within the two years following the birth of their first child.