scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United

TLDR
For two centuries the framers ideas about corruption flourished in the courts, even in the absence of clear rules governing voters, civil officers, and elected officials as discussed by the authors, and no case makes that clearer than "Citizens United."
Abstract
When Louis XVI presented Benjamin Franklin with a snuff box encrusted with diamonds and inset with the King s portrait, the gift troubled Americans: it threatened to corrupt Franklin by clouding his judgment or altering his attitude toward the French in subtle psychological ways. This broad understanding of political corruption rooted in ideals of civic virtue was a driving force at the Constitutional Convention.For two centuries the framers ideas about corruption flourished in the courts, even in the absence of clear rules governing voters, civil officers, and elected officials. Should a law that was passed by a state legislature be overturned because half of its members were bribed? What kinds of lobbying activity were corrupt, and what kinds were legal? When does an implicit promise count as bribery? In the 1970s the U.S. Supreme Court began to narrow the definition of corruption, and the meaning has since changed dramatically. No case makes that clearer than "Citizens United."In 2010, one of the most consequential Court decisions in American political history gave wealthy corporations the right to spend unlimited money to influence elections. Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion treated corruption as nothing more than explicit bribery, a narrow conception later echoed by Chief Justice Roberts in deciding "McCutcheon v. FEC" in 2014. With unlimited spending transforming American politics for the worse, warns Zephyr Teachout, "Citizens United" and "McCutcheon" were not just bad law but bad history. If the American experiment in self-government is to have a future, then we must revive the traditional meaning of corruption and embrace an old ideal."

read more

Citations
More filters
MonographDOI

Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life

TL;DR: The authors argue that ideological work of all kinds is fundamentally communicative, and that social positions, projects and historical moments influence, and are influenced by, people's ideas about communicative practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corruption: Classification and analysis

TL;DR: It is demonstrated, with empirical work from New York City and the State of Victoria in Australia, that more precise classification and characterisation of the nature and types of corrupt activity is an essential precondition to the development and design of targeted anti-corruption measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking the Anthropology of Corruption: An Introduction to Supplement 18

Sarah Muir, +1 more
- 08 Mar 2018 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors take stock of where the anthropological literature on corruption has come and where it might go next, and their goal is neither to provide an exhaustive lite lite...
Journal ArticleDOI

Antitrust in a time of populism

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss how to move antitrust enforcement forward in a constructive manner during a time of widespread and growing concern over the political and economic power of large corporations in the United States.
Book

Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

TL;DR: La Raja and Schaffner as mentioned in this paper argue that current rules allow wealthy ideological groups and donors to dominate the financing of political campaigns and propose that additional campaign money be channeled through party organizations, rather than directly to candidates.