scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Costs and Benefits of Moving to a County ACRE Program

TLDR
This paper proposed to modify the ACRE (Average Crop revenue election) program so that it covers county revenue rather than state revenue for approximately the same cost as the direct payment program, 100% of planted acres could be covered at a 95% coverage level.
Abstract
Better integration of the different programs that comprise the farm safety net seems inevitable in the next farm bill given widespread public concern over the rapidly growing federal debt With $5 billion in direct payments flowing annually to farmers who own or rent base acres without regard to farm income, $7 billion flowing to crop insurance companies over the last two years, and $26 billion flowing to cotton farmers in the last two years from programs that violate our trade commitments, there is substantial room for improvement One path toward better integration would be to modify the ACRE (Average Crop Revenue Election) program so that it covers county revenue rather than state revenue For approximately the same cost as the direct payment program, 100% of planted acres could be covered at a 95% coverage level Accounting for county ACRE payments before crop insurance payments are made could easily reduce the cost of the crop insurance program by more than $4 billion per year

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimal Coverage Level Choice with Individual and Area Insurance Plans

TL;DR: It is proposed that a farmer's optimal use of area and individual crop insurance when area andindividual losses are positively but imperfectly correlated is to be considered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic Assessment of Current Management in an Intensively Managed Agroecosystem

TL;DR: In this article, a modeling framework was developed with a bottom-up approach and spatially distributed, process-based models to assess management impacts on the functionality of intensively managed agroecosystems.
Book

Alternatives to a State-Based ACRE Program: Expected Payments Under a National, Crop District, or County Base

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors model how expected payments and the level of risk reduction from programs triggered at alternative levels would vary across crops, and how benefits from the alternative revenue programs would vary relative to benefits from direct payment and price-based commodity programs.
Posted ContentDOI

Analyzing Farmer Participation Intentions and Enrollment Rates for the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) Program

TL;DR: The authors used a multinomial logit model to analyze a mail survey administered before the 2008 ACRE sign-up deadline and identified factors driving farmer intentions regarding ACRE participation, including primary crops, risk perceptions, risk aversion, and program complexity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analyzing Farmer Participation Intentions and County Enrollment Rates for the Average Crop Revenue Election Program

TL;DR: The authors used a multinomial logit model to analyze a mail survey administered before the ACRE sign-up deadline, identifying factors driving farmer intentions regarding ACRE participation. But they did not assess the effect of similar factors on actual farmer decisions, concluding that primary crops, risk perceptions, risk aversion, and program complexity were important factors affecting participation.
References
More filters
Posted ContentDOI

A Real Options Framework for Analyzing Program Participation as Human Capital Investments: The Case of the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) Program

TL;DR: This article developed a real options framework to model producer participation in a subsidy program as a human capital investment to learn how the stochastic subsidy affects returns and how to adapt production activities to new program incentives.
Related Papers (5)