Permission to Reprint for Non-Commercial Uses This essay is published by Insight Assessment. The original appeared in 1992 and has been updated many times over the years. Although the author and the publisher hold all copyrights, in the interests of advancing education and improving critical thinking, permission is hereby granted for paper, electronic, or digital copies to be made in unlimited amounts, provided that their distribution is free of charge provided that whenever material from this essay is cited or extracted in whole or in part that appropriate citation is made by indicating this essay’s full title, author’s name, publisher’s name, year, and page or pages where it appears in this edition. For permission for reprints intended for sale contact Insight Assessment by phone at 650-697-5628 or by email to jmorante@insightassessment.com. ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.

/pdf/critical-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-counts-1txofk1ses.pdf

Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement, and Improvement.

Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts

The claim that critical thinking is subject specific appears, to be of practical importance and theoretical interest. Its meaning is unclear, however, and discussions of its are often confusing and at cross purposes. In an attempt to clarify the topic, Ennis offers a number of distinctions, including a distinction among three versions of subject specificity: domain, epistemological, and conceptual subject specificity. He holds that the first two versions contain valuable insights, but that all three suffer from excessive vagueness of their basic concept (domain, field, and subject, respectively). If the proposed clarification and critique are appropriate, then a number of avenues of research—at both practical and theoretical levels—need to be pursued, some of which are outlined in this essay

Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research:

/pdf/critical-thinking-a-literature-review-344sphf3aa.pdf

Critical Thinking: A Literature Review

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal ®

: A prior effort, State of Knowledge Relative to Intelligence Analysis, was initially motivated by the fact that seemingly little change had resulted from numerous studies of the intelligence community. Starting with Pearl Harbor, the U.S. intelligence community has often faced criticism for failing to predict or warn of future events. Though the criticisms have come from different groups, a certain commonality exists among the proposals for change in the intelligence community. The other noteworthy feature of these proposals is how little their content has changed over time. A thorough analysis of the intelligence literature was accomplished. This analysis provided an answer to the question of whether the existing literature on intelligence analysis contains the requisite knowledge to inform the development and application of both the mechanistic and cognitive activities to support doing intelligence analysis. A dominant finding was how little the practice of intelligence analysis had been informed by the findings in related scientific disciplines. The primary objective of this research effort was to understand the research findings in relevant scientific disciplines and to relate these findings to the practice of intelligence analysis. This research effort was based on the full text of over 5,800 documents consisting of nearly 172,000 pages. Our analysis of the current intelligence literature showed a continuation of previously observed trends. The number of publications dealing with intelligence analysis has decreased since 2007; in 2012 publication was at the level observed in 1996-1997. Also, we observed that the literature places less emphasis on the improvement of the quality of intelligence analysis. During the effort described in this report we conducted research syntheses for the topics of critical thinking, thinking dispositions, epistemological beliefs, practice based training, and various facets of cognition.

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA595401.pdf

Advanced Analysis Cognition: Improving the Cognition of Intelligence Analysis

/pdf/critical-thinking-its-nature-measurement-and-improvement-1rzqgw8wfk.pdf

Critical Thinking: Its Nature, Measurement, and Improvement.

Citations

Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts

Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research:

Critical Thinking: A Literature Review

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal ®

Advanced Analysis Cognition: Improving the Cognition of Intelligence Analysis

Related Papers (5)

Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.

Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction

A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills.

Critical thinking and education

Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach?