scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A systematic review of the empirical literature based on the major topics that have been associated with the market for cryptocurrencies since their development as a financial asset in 2009 is presented in this article, where the authors provide a systematic analysis of the main topics that influence the perception of cryptocurrencies as a credible investment asset class and legitimate of value.
About
This article is published in International Review of Financial Analysis.The article was published on 2019-03-01 and is currently open access. It has received 623 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Financial asset & Asset (economics).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies

TL;DR: In this article, the volatility relationship between the main Chinese stock markets and Bitcoin evolved significantly during this period of enormous financial stress, and the authors provided a number of observations as to why this situation occurred.
Journal ArticleDOI

Safe haven or risky hazard? Bitcoin during the Covid-19 bear market

TL;DR: It is shown that Bitcoin does not act as a safe haven, instead decreasing in price in lockstep with the S&P 500 as the crisis develops, and cast doubt on the ability of Bitcoin to provide shelter from turbulence in traditional markets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are cryptocurrencies a safe haven for equity markets? An international perspective from the COVID-19 pandemic

TL;DR: As Tether successfully maintained its peg to the US dollar during the COVID-19 turmoil, it acted as a safe haven investment for all of the international indices examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is Bitcoin a hedge or safe haven for currencies? An intraday analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether Bitcoin can act as a hedge or safe haven against world currencies and found that Bitcoin is a safe haven during periods of extreme market turmoil for the CAD, CHF and GBP.
ReportDOI

Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency

TL;DR: It is established that the risk-return tradeoff of cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ripple, and Ethereum) is distinct from those of stocks, currencies, and precious metals and that proxies for investor attention strongly forecast cryptocurrency returns.
References
More filters
Posted Content

Comparing Predictive Accuracy

TL;DR: The authors describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved and also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw, such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations.
ReportDOI

Comparing Predictive Accuracy

TL;DR: In this article, explicit tests of the null hypothesis of no difference in the accuracy of two competing forecasts are proposed and evaluated, and asymptotic and exact finite-sample tests are proposed, evaluated and illustrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market

TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a top-down approach to measure investor sentiment and quantify its effects, and show that it is quite possible to measure sentiment and that waves of sentiment have clearly discernible, important, and regular effects on individual firms and on the stock market as a whole.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Model Confidence Set

TL;DR: The paper revisits the inflation forecasting problem posed by Stock and Watson (1999), and compute the model confidence set (MCS) for their set of inflation forecasts, and compares a number of Taylor rule regressions to determine the MCS of the best in terms of in-sample likelihood criteria.
Posted Content

Bubbles, Rational Expectations and Financial Markets

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the nature and presence of bubbles in financial markets and concluded that bubbles, in many markets, are consistent with rationality, that phenomena such as runaway asset prices and market crashes were consistent with rational bubbles.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: a systematic analysis" ?

This paper provides a systematic review of the empirical literature based on the major topics that have been associated with the market for cryptocurrencies since their development as a financial asset in 2009. Despite astonishing price appreciation in recent years, cryptocurrencies have been subjected to accusations of pricing bubbles central to the trilemma that exists between regulatory oversight, the potential for illicit use through its anonymity within a young under-developed exchange system, and infrastructural breaches influenced by the growth of cybercriminality. 

But such accusations are directed in the knowledge that the future of finance and broad technology may lie in the underlying blockchain on which cryptocurrencies are based. 

Drawing from statistical physics and mathematics, the authors find evidence for a negative bubble from 2014 onwards in the two largest cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin and Ripple. 

By making the block size a non-binding constraint and at the same time letting the fee be fixed as the outcome of a decentralised competitive market cannot guarantee the existence of Bitcoin in the long-run. 

The company claims it needs ‘several weeks’ to verify the ‘accredited investors’ status of those who applied to invest in the ICO. 

Baek and Elbeck [2015] use the S&P500 to examine relative volatility with Bitcoin using de-trended ratios to find that Bitcoin is internally driven by buyers and sellers, therefore concluding that the Bitcoin market is highly speculative. 

In an interview with Business Insider on 27 February 2018, the chief investment officer of the Investment Strategy Group of Goldman Sachs stated that cryptocurrencies at large are in a bubble and ‘when it bursts, will impact only 1 percent of global GDP’6ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTAC CEPT EDM ANUS CRIP 

Tinterest when attempting to monitor potential bubbles in the market for cryptocurrencies, particularly issues such as power consumption and mining expense. 

In January 2018, the South Korean Financial Services Commission introduced measures to ban anonymous trading on domestic exchanges, while foreigners and minors would be completely banned from trading through cryptocurrency accounts. 

Within their own structure, cryptocurrencies are not domiciled in any single country’s borders, which inherently is one of the key problems when attempting to define regulatory alignment. 

A further major issue surrounds that of anonymity, which must be addressed to undermine issues such as money-laundering and general misappropriation of funds, particularly when considering the ease of cross-border transfer of cryptocurrencies. 

Platanakis and Urquhart [2018] have examined the diversification benefits of adding Bitcoin to a stock-bond portfolio and find that the out-of-sample benefits are quite considerable with substantially higher Sharpe, Sortino and Omega ratios, which hold across all different asset allocation strategies and risk aversions. 

The authors consider the relevant literature in due course but identify the potential for inherent pricing bubbles as one of the key economic risks central to the existence of cryptocurrencies at large. 

Cheah and Fry [2015] found that Bitcoin exhibits speculative bubbles with further empirical evidence provided that the fundamental price of Bitcoin is zero. 

The author’s proposed construction can guarantee that no matter how a malicious outsourcer behaves, the honest workers will be paid if he/she completed the computing tasks. 

Regulatory issues are not confined to money-laundering aspects and as to whether the costs of cryptocurrency barriers could hinder the potential benefits. 

this paper is motivated by the growing amount of academic literature analysing a variety of issues associated with the rapid growth of cryptocurrency markets.