scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head)

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The goal is to produce a brief, self-administered measure of symptoms and functional status, with a focus on physical function, to be used by clinicians in daily practice and as a research tool.
Abstract
This paper describes the development of an evaluative outcome measure for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions. The goal is to produce a brief, self-administered measure of symptoms and functional status, with a focus on physical function, to be used by clinicians in daily practice and as a research tool. This is a joint initiative of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS), the Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS), and the Institute for Work and Health (Toronto, Ontario). Our approach is consistent with previously described strategies for scale development. In Stage 1, Item Generation, a group of methodologists and clinical experts reviewed 13 outcome measurement scales currently in use and generated a list of 821 items. In Stage 2a, Initial Item Reduction, these 821 items were reduced to 78 items using various strategies including removal of items which were generic, repetitive, not reflective of disability, or not relevant to the upper extremity or to one of the targeted concepts of symptoms and functional status. Items not highly endorsed in a survey of content experts were also eliminated. Stage 2b, Further Item Reduction, will be based on results of field testing in which patients complete the 78-item questionnaire. This field testing, which is currently underway in 20 centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia, will generate the final format and content of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Future work includes plans for validity and reliability testing.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

TL;DR: A comparison of item-reduction approaches suggested that the retention of clinically sensible and important content produced a comparable, if not slightly better, instrument than did more statistically driven approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI

The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery

TL;DR: The DASH can detect and differentiate small and large changes of disability over time after surgery in patients with upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders and show treatment effectiveness after surgery for subacromial impingement and carpal tunnel syndrome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

TL;DR: The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring hand outcomes and can be used in a clinic setting with minimal burden to patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH

TL;DR: The results indicate that the Quick DASH can be used instead of the DASH with similar precision in upper extremity disorders.
References
More filters
Book

SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide

John E. Ware
TL;DR: TheSF-36 is a generic health status measure which has gained popularity as a measure of outcome in a wide variety of patient groups and social and the contribution of baseline health, sociodemographic and work-related factors to the SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide is tested.
Book

Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose three basic concepts: devising the items, selecting the items and selecting the responses, from items to scales, reliability and validity of the responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Disablement Process.

TL;DR: This article compares the disablement experiences of people who acquire chronic conditions early in life and those who acquire them in mid or late life (late-life disability), which can help inform research and public health activities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

TL;DR: Comparison studies are needed of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease-specific measures in the same population and in minority and age-specific groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Self-Administered Questionnaire for the Assessment of Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

TL;DR: It is concluded that the scales for the measurement of severity of symptoms and functional status are reproducible, internally consistent, and responsive to clinical change, and that they measure dimensions of outcomes not captured by traditional measurements of impairment of the median nerve.
Related Papers (5)