Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of combining contingency management with behavioral activation for smokers with depression
TLDR
Findings support and expand previous evidence by showing that smokers with depression achieve high cessation rates without suffering negative mood changes and suggest that BA and CM are promising interventions for this difficult to treat population.Abstract:
Background: Few studies on Behavioral Activation (BA) have been conducted among smokers with depression and very scarce evidence on Contingency Management (CM) in this population exists. This study...read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of behavioural activation on substance use and depression: a systematic review.
Carmela Martínez-Vispo,Úrsula Martínez,Ana López-Durán,Elena Fernández del Río,Elisardo Becoña +4 more
TL;DR: Behavioural Activation intervention effects to improve substance use behaviour and depression showed that BA had a positive effect on substance use outcomes in seven of the eight reviewed studies, and improved depression over time in six studies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Additive effectiveness of contingency management on cognitive behavioural treatment for smokers with depression: Six-month abstinence and depression outcomes.
Roberto Secades-Villa,Alba González-Roz,Guillermo Vallejo-Seco,Sara Weidberg,Ángel García-Pérez,Fernando Alonso-Pérez +5 more
TL;DR: Quitting smoking is not detrimental and adding CM to CBT + BA enhances long-lasting abstinence rates while promoting large depression improvements, and CM is more effective for generating longer durations of abstinence beyond those of CBT+BA.
Journal ArticleDOI
One-Year Efficacy and Incremental Cost-effectiveness of Contingency Management for Cigarette Smokers With Depression.
Alba González-Roz,Sara Weidberg,Ángel García-Pérez,Víctor Martínez-Loredo,Roberto Secades-Villa +4 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that CM is feasible and highly cost-effective, confirming that its implementation is worthwhile, and Behavioral treatments addressing both smoking and depression are efficacious for sustaining high quit rates at one year.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is behavioral activation an effective and acceptable treatment for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
TL;DR: This paper performed a random effects meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trial evidence base and found no significant differences between BA and controls with regard to depression (Post-treatment: k = 5, N = 195; SMD: 0.19, CI −0.34 to 0.51, GRADE=Low) and there was little evidence of publication bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is behavioral activation an effective and acceptable treatment for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
TL;DR: In this article , the authors performed a random effects meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trial evidence base and compared outcomes for individual or group behavioral activation (BA) against passive or active controls.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.
TL;DR: A revision of the FTQ: the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), which found that a revised scoring of time to the first cigarette of the day (TTF) and number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) improved the scale.
Journal ArticleDOI
Smoking and Mental Illness: A Population-Based Prevalence Study
Karen E. Lasser,J. Wesley Boyd,Steffie Woolhandler,David U. Himmelstein,Danny McCormick,David H. Bor +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report that persons with mental disorders are twice as likely to smoke as other individuals, but have substantial quit rates compared with persons without mental disorders, and that smoking rates for individuals with mental disorder are higher than those without mental disorder.
Journal ArticleDOI
Behavioral activation treatments of depression: A meta-analysis.
TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis of randomized effect studies of activity scheduling was conducted and the pooled effect size indicating the difference between these two types of treatment was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.60~1.15).