scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Electrocochleography and auditory brainstem electric responses in patients with pontine angle tumors.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Evidence is presented that the increase in I-V delay in the BSERs is caused by differential action of the tumor upon low and high frequency fibers in the auditory nerve and that desynchronization of the firings of the nerve fibers is of more importance than an increase in neural conduction time.
Abstract
In 45 patients with surgically proven pontine angle tumors, compound action potential (AP) and summating potential (SP) were recorded with transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) together with brainstem electric responses (BSER). The aims were to quantify the mechanism by which tumors cause hearing loss and evaluate the diagnostic potentials of ECochG and BSER for detecting eighth nerve and brainstem tumors. Except for AP latency and narrow band AP waveform, response parameters recorded by ECochG are uncorrelated. Four uncorrelated parameters were abnormal in only 10% of the cases, three in 25%, two in 40%, and one in 90%. The BSER criterion was the latency delay between waves I and IV and resulted in about 90% detection, improving to 95% when used in combination with ther interaural wave V delay criterion. ECochG results provide evidence that, for hearing losses up to 60 dB HL, the origin is cochlear, resembling that caused by Meniere's disease. Evidence is presented that the increase in I-V delay in the BSERs is caused by differential action of the tumor upon low and high frequency fibers in the auditory nerve and that desynchronization of the firings of the nerve fibers is of more importance than an increase in neural conduction time. ECochG as the sole test for detection of pontine angle tumors appears to be of limited value. Brainstem response on its own has great merits; however, it should be emphasized that no wave I was detected in about 30% of the cases. The 95% detection score obtained with BSER depends on specifying the latency of wave I. For these cases, we substituted the latency of the AP recorded by ECochG.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical picture of vestibular schwannoma.

TL;DR: Hearing loss and tinnitus are the main symptoms of vestibular schwannoma and Screening to detect vestIBular schWannoma is more yielding in sudden deafness patients rather than in patients with Meniere's disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

Management of Vestibular Schwannomas (Acoustic Neuromas): The Value of Neurophysiology for Evaluation and Prediction of Auditory Function in 420 Cases

Cordula Matthies, +1 more
- 01 May 1997 - 
TL;DR: By the presented classification of ABR Types B1 through B5, preoperative prediction of the likelihood of hearing preservation is improved.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of cat and human brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

TL;DR: The presence of binaural interaction beginning with P4 and PV suggests a correspondence between peaks P4 through P5 in cat with PV through PVI, respectively, in human, and the similarity in behavior of these peaks also support this correspondence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Loss of auditory function in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: Results in 143 consecutive cases

TL;DR: In this series of 143 patients who were operated on for hemifacial spasm by microvascular decompression of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve, only 2.8% suffered a significant hearing loss as a complication of facial nerve decompression to relieve hemif facial spasm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategy and benefits of acoustic neuroma searching.

TL;DR: An analysis of 66 cases of surgically treated acoustic neuromas at Addenbrooke's Hospital shows the relative morbidity of early and late surgical intervention in these cases, and the justification for early diagnosis and treatment is presented both in financial and human terms.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Neurological Disease

Arnold Starr, +1 more
- 01 Nov 1975 - 
TL;DR: A sequence of seven low-amplitude (nanovolt) potentials that occur in the initial 10 msec following click signals can be recorded from scalp electrodes in human subjects using computer averaging techniques and are thought to be the far-field reflection of electrical events originating in the auditory pathway during its course through the brain stem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human Auditory Evoked Potentials: Possible Brain Stem Components Detected on the Scalp

TL;DR: Auditory potentials recorded from the vertex of humans by a modified averaging technique have very short latencies and are probably generated by brain stem structures located at a considerable distance from the recording point.
Journal ArticleDOI

Far-Field Acoustic Response: Origins in the Cat

TL;DR: Short-latency evoked potentials recorded from the vertex of adult cats in response to click stimulation were analyzed in a series of lesion experiments to determine the origins of each component.
Journal ArticleDOI

Correlation between confirmed sites of neurological lesions and abnormalities of far-field auditory brainstem responses

TL;DR: Far-field auditory brainstem responses were recorded in patients in whom the distribution of pathology was defined at autopsy or at operation and it is concluded that Wave I reflects activity of VIII nerve, Waves II and III reflect activity of cochlear nucleus, trapezoid body, and superior olive and Waves IV and V reflectActivity of lateral lemniscus and inferior colliculus.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acoustic Tumor Detection With Brain Stem Electric Response Audiometry

TL;DR: Acoustic tumor size can be estimated from the amount of latency delay, which was 0.4 msec or greater for 35 acoustic tumor cases and for seven of ten other temporal bone tumors.
Related Papers (5)