Open AccessBook
Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers
Kurt Lewin,Dorwin Cartwright +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
About:
The article was published on 1975-06-01 and is currently open access. It has received 916 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Field theory (sociology).read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
System design of “Ba”-like stages for improvisational acts via Leibnizian space–time and Peirce’s existential graph concepts
TL;DR: A framework for “improvisational” social acts and communication is introduced by referring to the idea of “relationalism” such as natural farming, permaculture and deep ecology and the notion of Existential Graph is introduced.
Journal ArticleDOI
Donor research in australia: challenges and promise.
TL;DR: In this paper, two major collaborative programs of the Australian Red Cross Blood Service's research, focusing on recruitment and retention of plasmapheresis donors and the role of the emotion pride in donor motivation and return, are showcased to elucidate how the challenges of conducting collaborative BCA research can be met.
Journal Article
Customer's Potential Value: The Role of Learning
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore customer perceived value as a multidimensional phenomenon incorporating expected, realized, and potential dimensions, and show the role of customer learning particularly in realizing the potential value of novel technological services.
Dissertation
Sustainability programmes for business: place and practice within the context of relevant developments in organisation theory
TL;DR: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person.
Dissertation
A critical study of the practice characteristics of architectural firms in nigeria
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored the characteristics of architectural firms in Nigeria empirically using the systems approach to the study of organizations, and found that the most important causes of differences between the architectural firms were level of specialization of activities, and varieties of services offered, which accounted for more than half of the differences among the firms.