scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Fishing on the Incoming Tide

Dawn Oliver
- 01 May 1991 - 
- Vol. 54, Iss: 3, pp 442-451
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In the case of the United Kingdom v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex parte Factortame (No 2) as discussed by the authors, the authors raised a number of important isksues about the compatibility of English law with Community law, and remedies in English law.
Abstract
The decisions of the United Kingdom courts in the two cases of R v Secretasy of State for Transport, Ex parte Factortame ' and Factortame (No 2) 2 raise a number of important isksues about the compatibility of English law with Community law, and remedies in English law. The factual background to the litigation is complicated and needs to be set out briefly before the legal issues can be explored. The common fisheries policy of the European Community is suppoksed to protect the Hlshing stocks in EC waters by limiting catches. Given that the limitation of fishing will inevitably damage the HIshing industries of the various member states, a quota system was introducecl that was designed to 'assure each member state relative stability of fi<hing activities for each of the stocks considered.'3 In particular, stability must 'safeguard the particular needs of regions where local populations are especially dependent on fisheries and related industries.'4 The Spanish fishing fleet is the largest in the EEC, and its fishing vessels have for many years Elshed in the waters that are now covered by the fisheries policy. The British government became concerned from 1980 that Spanish vessels were 'quota-hopping' by registering in the United Kingdom and taking fish that should have been available to the British fishing industry under the quota system. The UK governme.nt first sought to counteract 'quota-hopping' and protect the British industry by imposing conditions on the granting of licences to fish against UK quotas. These conditions have for the most part been found to be unlawful by the European Court of Justice (the ECJ).s The Britiksh government then tried again to prevent fishing against British quotas by Spanish vessels by altering the law relating to registration, which is a precondition to obtaining a licence to fish. The Merchant Shipping Act 1988 and the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Fishing Vessels) Regulations 1988 required vessels that had previously been registered under the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 to re-register under new conditions. These conditions were designed to prevent Spanish fishing vessels registering by imposing nationality requirements. Nincty-five vessel.s were unable to register because they could not comply with these conditions. Of these, fifty-three were originally registered in Spain and flew the Spanish flag, and had registered under the British Merchant Shipping Act 1894 at various dates from 1980 onwards. The remaining forty-two had always been British, but were purchased by the applicants at various dates mainly since 1983.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Governmental Liability after Francovich

TL;DR: Governmental liability used to be on the retreat, especially but not only in the field of negligence liability as mentioned in this paper, but also in the area of economic loss, and the House of Lords, departing from Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, dramatically curtailed any hope or fear, it depends on the point of view.
Book ChapterDOI

The Genesis and Structure of General Principles of Global Public Law

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the traditional divide between State public law and international public law should be reconsidered, in terms of specialisation, rather than separation, and that these general legal principles can be called global, so as to distinguish them more clearly from the principles exclusively proper to international law.
Journal ArticleDOI

Judicial politics in Britain: Patrolling the boundaries

TL;DR: The authors consider judicial policy making in Great Britain by noting the peculiarly British institutional restraints on judicial action of parliamentary sovereignty, the resulting subordination of all courts to the legislative branch and the absence of a codified charter of rights or constitution.
Related Papers (5)