scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Frequency-selective fat suppression MR imaging. Localized asymmetric failure of fat suppression mimicking orbital disease.

TLDR
Failure of FATSAT fat suppression may mimic orbital disease, particularly if asymmetric, as predicted by the Maxwell electromagnetism equation, slight variations in orientation of the fat-air interface to the Z axis may produce large asymmetries in fat suppression failure in the orbit.
Abstract
Our objectives were to further characterize an artifact related to the localized failure of the frequency-selective (FATSAT) fat suppression magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique We constructed two phantoms simulating human orbital anatomy and imaged them on a 15-T MR scanner using (FATSAT) and short T1 inversion recovery (STIR) techniques of fat suppression The first phantom resembled orbit structural configurations; it was imaged in coronal and axial planes and in varying orientations with respect to the main magnetic field (Z axis) to study the features of the artifact and to reproduce the asymmetry seen in clinical cases We designed the second phantom to enable quantification of the change in artifact size with change in orientation We imaged the orbits of a normal human volunteer in similar planes and orientations, and compared the results to clinical cases demonstrating the artifact and true orbital disease The artifact identified with localized failure of FATSAT fat suppression manifested as regions of hyperintensity maximal at fat-air interfaces, with gradual fading of the increased signal with distance from the interfaces The artifact was most prominent when the interfaces were perpendicular to the axis of the main magnetic field (Z axis) The regions of increased brightness obscured normal orbital structures but were not associated with alterations in the geometry of these structures Changes in orientation of the interfaces with respect to the Z axis, both in the phantoms and normal volunteer, reproduced the asymmetry of fat suppression failure seen in clinical cases The relationship of size of the artifact to change in orientation was non-linear The artifact was not seen on STIR images We concluded that failure of FATSAT fat suppression may mimic orbital disease, particularly if asymmetric As predicted by the Maxwell electromagnetism equation, slight variations in orientation of the fat-air interface to the Z axis may produce large asymmetries in fat suppression failure in the orbit Confirmation may require either comparison with additional pulse sequences [T1-weighted spin echo (T1W SE) or STIR] or repositioning the patient's head to check for persistence of the finding with varying orientations

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Imaging of the Central Skull Base

TL;DR: This review focuses on a systematic approach to this region based on an anatomic division that takes into account the major tissue constituents of the CSB.
Journal ArticleDOI

Imaging of skull base tumours.

TL;DR: All skull base imaging should be performed using thin-section multiplanar imaging, whereby CT and MRI can be considered complimentary, to improve the outcome of these challenging tumours.
Journal ArticleDOI

Skull base tumours part I: Imaging technique, anatomy and anterior skull base tumours

TL;DR: This review will focus on the advances in imaging technique; contribution to patient's management and on the imaging features of the most common tumours affecting the anterior skull base.
Journal ArticleDOI

Suppression of intravascular signal on fat-saturated contrast-enhanced thoracic MR arteriograms.

TL;DR: Intravascular signal intensity loss can be present on contrast-enhanced fat-saturated images of the aortic arch and proximal branch vessels, particularly the left subclavian artery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fast spin‐echo triple‐echo Dixon: Initial clinical experience with a novel pulse sequence for fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted abdominal MR imaging

TL;DR: To evaluate a prototype fast spin echo (FSE) triple‐echo‐Dixon (fTED) technique for breath‐hold, fat‐suppressed, T2‐weighted abdominal imaging.
Related Papers (5)