scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

From Degrading to De-Grading.

Alfie Kohn
- 01 Jan 1999 - 
- Vol. 6, Iss: 5, pp 38-43
TLDR
A teacher's values and personality can be inferred by asking how he or she feels about giving grades as discussed by the authors, and they may even use surprise quizzes for that purpose, keeping their gradebooks at the ready.
Abstract
YOU CAN TELL A LOT ABOUT a teacher’s values and personality just by asking how he or she feels about giving grades. Some defend the practice, claiming that grades are necessary to “motivate” students. Many of these teachers actually seem to enjoy keeping intricate records of students’ marks. Such teachers periodically warn students that they’re “going to have to know this for the test” as a way of compelling them to pay attention or do the assigned readings— and they may even use surprise quizzes for that purpose, keeping their gradebooks at the ready.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Summative Assessment and Tests on Students’ Motivation for Learning

TL;DR: This work is a review of the Assessment and Learning Research Synthesis Group (ALRSG) and was conducted following the procedures for systematic review developed by the EPPI-Centre and in collaboration with David Gough and Dina Kiwan.
Journal ArticleDOI

An “Ideology in Pieces” Approach to Studying Change in Teachers’ Sensemaking About Race, Racism, and Racial Justice

TL;DR: This article propose a framework of "ideology in pieces" that synthesizes Hall's theory of ideology and diSessa's (1993) theory of conceptual change to understand the elements of ideological sensemaking and the processes of ideological transformation.
Journal Article

The Case against Grades.

Alfie Kohn
TL;DR: In this paper, a two-step dance of gathering information about how students are doing, and then sharing that information along with their judgments with the students and their parents is described.
Journal Article

The Trouble with Rubrics

Alfie Kohn
- 01 Mar 2006 - 
TL;DR: For instance, this paper pointed out that it is hardly sufficient to recommend a given approach on the basis of its being better than old-fashioned report cards, and that not all alternative assessments are authentic.
References
More filters
Book

Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research

TL;DR: One day, you will discover a new adventure and knowledge by spending more money as discussed by the authors. But when? Do you think that you need to obtain those all requirements when having much money? Why don't you try to get something simple at first?
Journal ArticleDOI

Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation.

TL;DR: Assessment of the effects of motivationally relevant conditions and individual differences on emotional experience and performance on a learning task found that children in the controlling condition experienced more pressure and evidenced a greater deterioration in rote learning over an 8-(+/- 1) day follow-up.
Book

Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A'S, Praise, and Other Bribes

Alfie Kohn
Abstract: Alfie Kohn challenges our reliance on carrot-and-stick psychology in Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. This is an intriguing indictment of rewards at work, at school, and at home. "Do this and you'll get that," (Kohn, 1993, p. 3) summarizes the prevailing strategy for managing workers, teaching students, and raising children. Kohn contends that managers, teachers, and parents dangle goodies, from candy bars to sales commissions, in front of people in the same way a pet is trained.
Book

No Contest: The Case Against Competition

Alfie Kohn
TL;DR: In the last fifty years, no one has written a book that explores the very idea of competition and the way it plays itself out in all the varied arenas of human life as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set

TL;DR: The authors found that students who learn in order to teach were more intrinsically motivated, had higher conceptual learning scores, and perceived themselves to be more actively engaged with the environment than those who learned to be examined.