scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

How does a riverine setting affect the lifestyle of shellmound builders in Brazil

TLDR
This study tests if the rare evidence of fish and mollusc remains in the riverine shellmound led to higher caries rates and lower auditory exostosis frequency, and if the small size of the bank translates into reduced demographic density and thus rarity of communicable infectious diseases.
Abstract
The contact of inland and coastal prehistoric groups in Brazil is believed to have been restricted to regions with no geographical barrier, as is the case in the Ribeira de Iguape valley. The inland osteological collection from the riverine shellmound Moraes (5800–4500 BP) represents a unique opportunity to test this assumption for this region. Despite cultural similarities between riverine and coastal shellmounds, important ecological and site distribution differences are expected to impact on lifestyle. The purpose of this study is thus to document and interpret health and lifestyle indicators in Moraes in comparison to coastal shellmound groups. Specifically we test if the rare evidence of fish and mollusc remains in the riverine shellmound led to (a) higher caries rates and (b) lower auditory exostosis frequency and (c) if the small size of the riverine shellmound translates into reduced demographic density and thus rarity of communicable infectious diseases. Of the three hypotheses, (a) was confirmed, (b) was rejected and (c) was partly rejected. Bioanthropological similarities between Moraes and coastal shellmounds include auditory exostoses with equally high frequencies; significantly more frequent osteoarthritis in upper than in lower limbs; cranial and dental morphological affinities and low frequencies of violent trauma. However, there are also important differences: Moraes subsisted on a much broader protein diet and consumed more

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

University of Nebraska - Lincoln
DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
#2- '+/*#2&#1'235$-+%#4+0/3 #452#- '3052%'3!%*00-0(

How does a riverine se'ing a&ect the lifestyle of
shellmound builders in Brazil?
Sabine Eggers
Universidade de São Paulo3'#))'23531$2
C. C. Petronilho
Universidade de São Paulo
K. Brandt
Universidade de São Paulo
C. Jericó-Daminello
Universidade de São Paulo
J. Filippini
Universidade de São Paulo
See next page for additional authors
0--074*+3#/&#&&+4+0/#-702,3#4 *=1&+)+4#-%0..0/35/-'&5/#42'32'+/*#2&
#240(4*' 2%*#'0-0)+%#-/4*2010-0)80..0/3 %0-0)8#/&60-54+0/#28+0-0)8
0..0/3 /6+20/.'/4#-5$-+%'#-4*0..0/3 4*'25$-+%'#-4*0..0/3#/&4*'
#2#3+40-0)80..0/3
<+324+%-'+3$205)*440805(02(2''#/&01'/#%%'33$84*'#452#- '3052%'3!%*00-0(#4+)+4#-0..0/3"/+6'23+480('$2#3,#+/%0-/4
*#3$''/#%%'14'&(02+/%-53+0/+/#2- '+/*#2&#1'235$-+%#4+0/3$8#/#54*02+9'&#&.+/+342#4020(+)+4#-0..0/3"/+6'23+480('$2#3,#
+/%0-/
))'23!#$+/''420/+-*02#/&4'2+%:#.+/'--0+-+11+/+#/& '+/*#2&#2-07&0'3#2+6'2+/'3'=+/)#;'%4
4*'-+('348-'0(3*'--.05/&$5+-&'23+/2#9+- Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications
*=1&+)+4#-%0..0/35/-'&5/#42'32'+/*#2&

Authors
!#$+/'))'23'420/+-*02#/&4'2+%:#.+/'--0+-+11+/+#/&#2- '+/*#2&
<+3#24+%-'+3#6#+-#$-'#4+)+4#-0..0/3"/+6'23+480('$2#3,#+/%0-/ *=1&+)+4#-%0..0/35/-'&5/#42'32'+/*#2&

405
Published in HOMO - Journal of Comparative Human Biology 59:6
(December 20, 2008), pp. 405–427; doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2008.04.005
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier GmbH. Used by permission.
Submitted 8 August 2007; accepted 27 April 2008;
published online 21 November 2008.
How does a riverine setting affect the lifestyle
of shellmound builders in Brazil?
S. Eggers,
1
C. C. Petronilho,
1
K. Brandt,
1
C. Jericó-Daminello,
1
J. Filippini,
1
and K. J. Reinhard
2
1 Laboratório de Antropologia Biológica, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva,
Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo, Brazil
2 School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Corresponding author — S. Eggers, email seaggers@usp.br
Abstract
The contact of inland and coastal prehistoric groups in Brazil is believed to have
been restricted to regions with no geographical barrier, as is the case in the Ribeira
de Iguape valley. The inland osteological collection from the riverine shellmound
Moraes (5800–4500 BP) represents a unique opportunity to test this assumption
for this region. Despite cultural similarities between riverine and coastal shell-
mounds, important ecological and site distribution differences are expected to im-
pact on lifestyle. The purpose of this study is thus to document and interpret health
and lifestyle indicators in Moraes in comparison to coastal shellmound groups.
-
ine shellmound led to (a) higher caries rates and (b) lower auditory exostosis fre-
quency and (c) if the small size of the riverine shellmound translates into reduced
demographic density and thus rarity of communicable infectious diseases. Of the

Bioanthropological similarities between Moraes and coastal shellmounds include
-
-
ties and low frequencies of violent trauma. However, there are also important dif-
ferences: Moraes subsisted on a much broader protein diet and consumed more
cariogenic food, but showed a stature even shorter than coastal groups. Thus, de-
spite the contact also suggested by treponematoses in both site types, there was
enough time for the people at the riverine site to adapt to local conditions.
digitalcommons.unl.edu
digitalcommons.unl.edu

406  59 (2008)
Resumo
O contato de grupos pré-históricos brasileiros interioranos e costeiros é tido como




costeiros, espera-se que as importantes diferenças ecológicas e de padrão de as-

e interpretar indicadores de saúde e estilo de vida dos habitants de Moraes, em


se a (a) frequencias de cáries mais elevadas, e (b) proporções menores de exos-

-
-
cialmente, rejeitada. Semelhanças bioantropológicas entre habitantes de Moraes
e sambaquieiros da costa incluem exostese auditiva em frequências igualmente


traumatismos violentos. Entretanto, também foram constatadas diferenças impor-
tantes: os indivíduos de Moraes, de estatura ainda inferior a de sambaquieriros
da costa, alimentavam-se de uma dieta mais cariogência, sendo o aporte proteico
-


J J J
Introduction
Brazilian shellmounds
Almost the entire 8000 km long coast of Brazil was once inhabited by shellmound
(or sambaqui) builders. More than 1000 coastal sites of this type, dated to between 8000
and 800 years ago, have been recorded (Gaspar, 1998; Lima et al., 2004). They vary in
size and can reach seventy meters in height and several hundreds of meters in diame-
ter (de Blasis et al., 2007). Consisting mainly of complex sequences of layers of shells
and sand, they also contain hearths, artefacts, food remains, and elaborate burials asso-
ciated with bone and stone offerings as well as ochre.
Coastal shellmounds in Brazil are currently considered as monumental constructions
intentionally built by sedentary people with high population densities (de Blasis et al.,
1998; Gaspar, 1998). Zooarchaeological and stable isotope studies have shown that


 407

food debris, but as construction material. Probably these people used boats, since there

the faunal remains (Gaspar, 2000; Tenório, 2000). The use of plants, albeit until recently
believed to have been of minor importance, was in fact quite common (Boyadjian et
al., 2007; Scheel-Ybert, 1998 and Scheel-Ybert, 2001; Scheel-Ybert et al., 2003; We-
solowski, 2000). Therefore, the intense dental wear in skeletal remains associated with
shellmounds is today attributed more to the admixture of plant phytoliths, than to other
abrasives, such as shell fragments and sand present in the food (Reinhard et al., 2001).
Although the coastal Brazilian shellmound builders were of relatively short stature, they
were within the range of variation of prehistoric and extant Native Americans (Storto

attributed to the intense contact with animal remains and pathogens typical for tropical
-
cable infectious diseases in some of the sites suggests high population density (Oku-
mura and Eggers, 2005). Although many neighboring sites are contemporaneous, an
overall low frequency of violent trauma among shellmound dwellers indicates a rela-
tively peaceful lifestyle and little competition for food resources (Lessa and Medeiros,
2001; Okumura and Eggers, 2005).
Although coastal shellmound builders are Mongoloids (Okumura, 2007), as are the
majority of extinct and extant Amerindians, Palaeoamericans with a premongoloid mor-

2007). However, because the most recent Palaeoamericans and the oldest shellmound
builders are roughly contemporaneous (and dated to around 10,000–8000 years ago),
questions arise on the origin and the contact of shellmound dwellers with other popula-
tions. This issue gained more attention with the description of a Paleoamerican morphol-
ogy of the oldest shellmound builder in Brazil, dated to about 9000 years ago (Neves
et al., 2005). Astonishingly, the site where this oldest shellmound dweller was found
is not a coastal site. It is a riverine shellmound called Capelinha, located in the Ribeira
valley, in the interior of the southeastern state of São Paulo (Figure 1).
Apart from the more than 1000 coastal shellmounds, there are also about 50 riverine
shellmounds recorded in Brazil. Riverine shellmounds have been studied more system-
atically since the eighties, although their existence is known since the end of the four-
teenth century (Barreto, 1988). They are known as riverine shellmounds because they
resemble coastal shellmounds in basic construction material (mainly mollusk shells of
Anomalocardia brasiliana in coastal and of Megalobulimus sp. in riverine sites), burial
distribution and pattern, habitation structures and remains giving clues about daily ac-
tivities (Eggers, in press; Figuti et al., 2004). Both were used concomitantly as a place
for living, dwelling, eating, as well as for the interment of the dead (Figuti et al., 2004).
The inland shellmounds are circular or ovoid structures, much smaller than those at
most coastal sites, and measure only about 500–2000 m
2
.
A region that most recently yielded new data on riverine shellmounds is the neigh-
borhood of Capelinha, the Ribeira valley, State of São Paulo. This valley is a geographic

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-Term Resilience of Late Holocene Coastal Subsistence System in Southeastern South America

TL;DR: Bulk collagen carbon and nitrogen isotopic analysis of 82 human individuals from mid to late Holocene Brazilian archaeological sites reveal an adequate protein incorporation and, on the coast, the continuation in subsistence strategies based on the exploitation of aquatic resources despite the introduction of pottery and domesticated plant foods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Syphilis at the Crossroad of Phylogenetics and Paleopathology

TL;DR: It is confirmed that syphilis seems to have emerged in this time span, since the resulting evolutionary rate is compatible with those observed in other bacteria.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tracing patterns of activity in the human skeleton: An overview of methods, problems, and limits of interpretation

TL;DR: It appears doubtful that adult patterns of activity can truly be isolated from those which stem from the formative years of the human skeleton during the subadult growth period, and a more cautious approach to the interpretation of data and a return to more basic research are needed to adequately address all the possibly confounding issues when trying to reconstruct patterns ofActivity from archaeological skeletal remains.
Journal ArticleDOI

A redefinition of waste: Deconstructing shell and fish mound formation among coastal groups of southern Brazil

TL;DR: Shellmounds and fishmounds show a complex pre-depositional history that denies the traditional view of them as secondary deposits of food remains, and substantial implications result from this analysis related to the identification of recurrent behaviors in shellmound formation and growth.
References
More filters

Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History

TL;DR: In this paper, a hands-on laboratory course is presented to examine the human skeleton as a dynamic, living system, with a review of normal and abnormal variations of each bone and apply this knowledge to make determinations about age, sex, stature and pathological conditions.

Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains

TL;DR: This hands-on laboratory course will take an in-depth study of the human skeleton as a dynamic, living system, and will examine each bone, with a review of normal and abnormal variations.
Book

Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains

TL;DR: This book provides essential text and materials on bone pathology, which will improve the diagnostic ability of those interested in human dry bone pathology and provides time depth to the understanding of the effect of disease on past human populations.
Book

Worldwide Variation in Human Growth

TL;DR: The first edition, published in 1976, included all known reliable recent results on height, weight, skinfolds and other body measurements from all parts of the globe, and very numerous measurements taken between 1976 and 1988 have been included as well as the results of the large number of new studies made on rate of maturation as evinced by bone age and pubertal development stages as discussed by the authors.
Book

The Cambridge encyclopedia of human paleopathology

TL;DR: The history of paleopathology and Pseudopathology, and its applications in medicine and sport are described and described in detail.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "How does a riverine setting affect the lifestyle of shellmound builders in brazil?" ?

The purpose of this study is thus to document and interpret health and lifestyle indicators in Moraes in comparison to coastal shellmound groups. Thus, despite the contact also suggested by treponematoses in both site types, there was enough time for the people at the riverine site to adapt to local conditions. 

More than 1000 coastal sites of this type, dated to between 8000 and 800 years ago, have been recorded (Gaspar, 1998; Lima et al., 2004). 

Activity markers: auditory exostosis, articular degeneration and traumaThe remains of 61 individuals from Moraes yielded only 18 adult auditory meatii preserved well enough for the analysis of auditory exostosis. 

Cribra orbitalia, formerly interpreted as a sign of anemia (Stuart-Macadam and Kent, 1992), is seen today as a consequence of a broad range of physiological stressors such as malnutrition, diarrhea, gastrointestinal parasites, genetic diseases and/or low level of iron absorption during growth due to specific dietary components (Wapler et al., 2004). 

because the most recent Palaeoamericans and the oldest shellmound builders are roughly contemporaneous (and dated to around 10,000–8000 years ago), questions arise on the origin and the contact of shellmound dwellers with other populations. 

It is a riverine shellmound called Capelinha, located in the Ribeira valley, in the interior of the southeastern state of São Paulo (Figure 1). 

the frequency of auditory exostoses (traditionally seen as an aquatic activity marker) is as high (22%) in Moraes as in coastal shellmounds from South Brazil (23–24%) and higher than in nearby coastal states of São Paulo and Paraná (16%) (Okumura et al., 2007). 

Considering this evidence and the absence of indicators of plant domestication at a large scale, the authors conclude that the cariogenic intake in Moraes possibly consisted of energy rich plants, such as tubers (Boyadjian et al., 2007), gathered randomly and/or harvested as a product of incipient farming. 

the main contributors to adult stature stunting in Moraes (if not a bias) seem not to have been either generalized malnutrition or (adaptation to) recurrent infections. 

Of these two explanations the second seems more reasonable, since there are genetic affinities between Moraes and nearby coastal groups, some marine faunal remains in the inland site and cultural similarities between riverine and coastal shellmounds.