Open AccessBook
Is Patriotism Distinct from Nationalism? The Meaning of “Patriotism” in China in the 2000s.
Karl Gustafsson
- Iss: 42
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Wang et al. as discussed by the authors argue that even though surveys have contributed important insights to our understanding of Chinese national identity, the sharp distinction between patriotism and nationalism risks obfuscating the more important question of what actors are willing to do in the name of patriotism.Abstract:
Since the 1990s, vigorous debate concerning a number of key issues has taken place within the study of Chinese nationalism. Scholars have tended to differentiate between diverse types of nationalism. For example, many studies distinguish between a malign nationalism on the one hand and a benign patriotism on the other. The strongest evidence for such a distinction can be found in survey research, which has demonstrated that patriotism, meaning love for the country, is empirically distinct from nationalism, i.e. the belief in the superiority of one’s country over other countries. In this paper, I take issue with this distinction. I argue that even though such surveys have contributed important insights to our understanding of Chinese national identity, the sharp distinction between patriotism and nationalism risks obfuscating the more important question of what actors are willing to do in the name of patriotism. If people are prepared to die and kill out of love for the country,the distinction between a benign patriotism and a malign nationalism cannot be so easily upheld. Based on a case study of the popular protests against Japan in China in autumn 2012, the Chinese media and government’s response, as well as the content of Chinese patriotic education, I demonstrate that the meaning of patriotism is a key aspect of Chinese identity politics, which has hitherto not been granted sufficient attention. (Less)read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism
TL;DR: In this paper, Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism are discussed. And the history of European ideas: Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 721-722.
Journal ArticleDOI
Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change
Book ChapterDOI
Mirror for the future or the history card? Understanding the ‘history problem’: Daqing Yang
TL;DR: The most recent high-level clashes over history issues took place during Chinese President Jiang Zemin's state visit to Japan in late 1998 as mentioned in this paper, where Jiang pointed out that Japan embarked on the path of militarism at the end of the 19th century and occupied the Chinese territory of Taiwan after the First Sino-Sino-Japanese War.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Management of Nationalism during the Jiang Era (1994–2002) and Its Implications On Government and Regime Legitimacy
TL;DR: The authors provided a detailed explanation of how the promotion of different nationalist discourses in China entails distinct repercussions on both government and regime legitimacy, looking for the rationale of governmental appeal to both affirmative and assertive nationalism within the context of general legitimacy crisis suffered by communism in the last years.