scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Spinal surgery journals with a higher IF contain a larger proportion of studies with high LOE, however most clinical articles provide level IV evidence of which the highest proportion are therapeutic studies.
About
This article is published in The Spine Journal.The article was published on 2013-09-01. It has received 28 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Evidence-based medicine.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research

TL;DR: A significant association between source of funding, study outcome, and LOE in spinal research was demonstrated and a large proportion of industry funded research was shown to provide level IV evidence and report favorable outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator and h-index for Neurosurgical and Spinal Surgical Journals.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided that the newer indices may be used interchangeably with the Impact Factor in this context, and they may, theoretically, mitigate some the shortcomings of the impact factor.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Analysis of References Used for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: What are Their Levels of Evidence and Journal Impact Factors?

TL;DR: The data show that the majority of the recommended readings for the OITE stem from higher impact general orthopaedic and major subspecialty journals, and a preponderance of Levels IV and V research, which may suggest that test-takers may find benefit in the review of high-level general orthopedic journals and review articles in particular while preparing forThe OITE.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: A systematic survey

TL;DR: The credibility of many current spine surgery meta-analyses is limited and researchers can improve future meta-Analyses by performing exhaustive literature searches, addressing possible explanations of heterogeneity, presenting results in a clinically useful manner, reproducibly selecting and assessing primary studies, addressing confidence in the pooled effect estimates, and adhering to guidelines for complete reporting.
Journal Article

Level of evidence of clinical neurosurgery research in Saudi Arabia.

TL;DR: This study aimed at evaluating the LOE in Saudi neurosurgical publications, and comparing this with the international literature, and with KSA publications from other specialties.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

TL;DR: A general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies is presented and tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interob server agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research

Per Ottar Seglen
- 15 Feb 1997 - 
TL;DR: Alternative methods for evaluating research are being sought, such as citation rates and journal impact factors, which seem to be quantitative and objective indicators directly related to published science.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing levels of evidence to the journal.

TL;DR: This section introduces orthopaedic surgeons to recent randomized trials relevant to the practice of orthopairedic surgery published in forty-two journals other than The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Journal Article

Journal impact factor: a brief review

TL;DR: The journal impact factor was created in the early 1960s to help select journals for the Science Citation Index (SCI), but it did not occur to me that it would one day become the subject of widespread controversy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing levels of evidence to the journal

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce orthopaedic surgeons to recent randomized trials relevant to the practice of orthopedic surgery published in forty-two journals other than The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Related Papers (5)